Suped

KDmarc vs DMARC Director

Choose KDmarc for foundational DMARC visibility, or DMARC Director for comprehensive email security.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc focuses on delivering essential DMARC reporting and analysis capabilities. It provides clear insights into DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, helping users understand their email authentication status quickly. The dashboard is designed for straightforward navigation, making it easy to identify compliance issues and potential spoofing attempts.
We find KDmarc particularly strong in visualising complex DMARC data, translating raw XML reports into human-readable graphs and tables. This makes it an accessible tool for organizations primarily concerned with gaining control over their DMARC posture without being overwhelmed by extraneous features.
DMARC Director, as part of the Tangent Security suite, offers a more expansive feature set beyond just DMARC. It integrates DMARC monitoring with broader email security and deliverability functions, aiming to provide a holistic view of an organization's email ecosystem. This includes more advanced threat intelligence and potentially deeper analysis capabilities.
Our experience shows DMARC Director to be adept at handling larger volumes of email data and offering granular controls for policy enforcement. It caters to organizations that require not only DMARC compliance but also robust protection against a wider range of email-borne threats, including those related to blocklists (or blacklists) and reputation management.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc prioritizes ease of use and a clean interface. For those new to DMARC, or who prefer a minimalist approach, KDmarc offers a welcoming environment. The setup process is generally quick, and understanding the core reports doesn't require extensive technical knowledge, allowing users to become productive almost immediately.
We appreciate its intuitive design, which guides users through the DMARC journey from a monitoring policy to enforcement. This focus on clarity reduces the learning curve, making it an excellent choice for teams with limited dedicated DMARC expertise or time.
DMARC Director, while powerful, presents a slightly steeper learning curve due to its broader feature set. The interface can feel more dense as it accommodates a wider range of security functions. However, for experienced users or those managing complex environments, this depth translates into greater control and customisation.
We've found that once familiar with its ecosystem, DMARC Director allows for sophisticated policy adjustments and integrates well into existing security operations. It's a tool that grows with your expertise, offering advanced functionalities that might not be immediately apparent to a novice DMARC user.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc provides support channels that align with its straightforward product offering, typically through email or a ticketing system. We've found their responses to be timely and helpful for standard DMARC inquiries and platform usage questions. Their documentation is also quite thorough, which often pre-empts the need for direct support.
For most users, the level of support offered by KDmarc is adequate for managing their DMARC implementation. They focus on efficient problem resolution for issues directly related to their platform's functionalities and DMARC configuration.
DMARC Director, being part of a larger security portfolio, often comes with a more enterprise-grade support model. This can include dedicated account managers, phone support, and more extensive consultation services, especially for larger deployments or managed service providers (MSPs).
Our interactions suggest that DMARC Director's support teams are well-versed not only in DMARC but also in the broader email security landscape, which is beneficial when dealing with complex integration or advanced threat scenarios. This depth of expertise can be a significant advantage for organizations requiring comprehensive assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations just beginning their DMARC journey. Its user-friendly interface and focus on core DMARC functionalities make it accessible and effective for establishing and maintaining a strong DMARC posture without unnecessary complexity.
For enterprise clients with foundational DMARC needs, KDmarc provides a solid platform. While it might not offer the full suite of advanced security tools, its dedication to DMARC makes it a strong contender for those who prefer a specialized, efficient solution. It is less geared towards MSPs requiring extensive multi-tenancy capabilities.
DMARC Director is well-suited for larger enterprises and managed service providers (MSPs) that require a comprehensive email security solution beyond just DMARC. Its advanced features, scalability, and broader threat intelligence capabilities cater to complex environments with diverse email security challenges.
For enterprises looking for an integrated approach to email deliverability, security, and brand protection, DMARC Director offers a robust platform. MSPs will particularly appreciate its potential for multi-tenancy and managing multiple client domains under a single, powerful system, offering a more unified security posture.

How does KDmarc compare with DMARC Director?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

While both KDmarc and DMARC Director excel in their respective niches, we've identified some areas for consideration. KDmarc, being more focused, may lack the broader email security features that larger enterprises or MSPs might seek, potentially necessitating additional tools. DMARC Director, on the other hand, might present a steeper initial learning curve due to its comprehensive nature, and its extensive feature set could be overkill for organizations with simpler DMARC requirements. Additionally, specific pricing details for both are not publicly available, which can be a drawback for quick comparisons.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

The pricing models for both KDmarc and DMARC Director are not publicly disclosed, requiring direct contact for quotes; however, DMARC Director does offer a 30-day trial.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or DMARC Director?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions