We found Fraudmarc's feature set to be highly focused on DMARC. It provides robust capabilities for DMARC reporting, aggregation, and analysis, allowing us to gain deep insights into email authentication results and identify potential email fraud (phishing) attempts targeting our domain. Its strength lies in its specialized approach, offering a comprehensive suite for DMARC implementation and enforcement.
While excellent for DMARC, Fraudmarc's scope is narrower than some broader security platforms. We appreciate its detailed DMARC data presentation, including forensic (DMARC fo=1) reports which are crucial for understanding attack vectors. The interface clearly breaks down authentication failures and compliance rates, making it straightforward to monitor our email ecosystem.
Netcraft Fraud Detection offers a much broader array of anti-phishing and anti-fraud services beyond just DMARC. Our experience shows it excels in proactive threat detection, taking down fraudulent websites, and monitoring for brand impersonation across the internet. Its DMARC capabilities are part of a larger security portfolio, focusing on preventing financial fraud and brand abuse.
The platform provides extensive intelligence on emerging threats and can automate the takedown of malicious sites, which is a significant advantage for organizations facing widespread digital fraud. While it includes DMARC reporting, it integrates this into a wider context of protecting against various online threats. We found its strength in its expansive threat intelligence network and rapid response capabilities against active phishing campaigns.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
From our perspective, Fraudmarc offers a straightforward and intuitive user interface, especially for those primarily focused on DMARC. The dashboards are clear, presenting DMARC compliance data in an easy-to-digest format. We appreciate the ability to quickly drill down into specific data points, making it efficient to identify authentication issues or unauthorized senders.
While the interface is functional, it feels purpose-built for DMARC specialists. Users familiar with DMARC concepts will find it easy to navigate. For new users, there might be a slight learning curve with some of the DMARC-specific terminology, but the overall layout is logical and helps simplify complex email authentication data.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, given its broader scope, presents a more comprehensive and feature-rich interface. We found that navigating its various modules, from DMARC to brand protection and takedowns, requires a bit more acclimatization. The platform is designed for security professionals who need a holistic view of online threats.
The user experience prioritizes depth and data richness over extreme simplicity. While functional, the sheer volume of information can be overwhelming initially. However, for those seeking detailed threat intelligence and incident response tools, the structured dashboards and reporting mechanisms are highly valuable, once mastered.
Which product has the best support
Support
Our interactions with Fraudmarc's support team have been positive. They demonstrate a strong understanding of DMARC and related email authentication protocols. We found their responses to be timely and knowledgeable, particularly when dealing with complex DMARC configuration or reporting queries.
The support is generally accessible through standard channels, and we've experienced a collaborative approach to problem-solving. While we haven't encountered major issues that required extensive troubleshooting, the assistance provided was always practical and directly addressed our concerns, reinforcing their expertise in the DMARC space.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, offering a wider range of services, provides support tailored to its comprehensive anti-fraud offerings. We've found their support to be highly responsive for urgent incidents, especially those related to takedowns and active phishing campaigns. Their team possesses deep expertise in cybersecurity and online fraud.
Due to the critical nature of their services, Netcraft's support is geared towards rapid incident resolution and strategic advice on threat mitigation. While DMARC specific questions are handled, their strength truly shines in broader threat intelligence and brand protection scenarios, where their incident response capabilities are a key asset.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Fraudmarc is particularly suitable for organizations that have a primary focus on implementing, monitoring, and enforcing DMARC effectively. We believe it is an excellent choice for businesses of all sizes looking for a dedicated and powerful DMARC reporting solution.
For MSPs (managed service providers), Fraudmarc offers a streamlined approach to manage DMARC for multiple clients. Enterprise clients will benefit from its in-depth analytics and robust reporting capabilities, which are essential for large, complex email infrastructures. SMBs can leverage its user-friendly interface to quickly establish DMARC compliance without needing extensive cybersecurity resources.
Netcraft Fraud Detection is best suited for organizations that require a comprehensive online fraud and brand protection platform, where DMARC is one component of a larger security strategy. It's ideal for businesses facing significant phishing (blacklist) threats and brand impersonation issues.
MSPs would find Netcraft valuable for offering advanced anti-phishing and takedown services to their clients. Enterprise-level organizations, especially those in high-risk industries, will greatly benefit from Netcraft's expansive threat intelligence, proactive monitoring, and rapid takedown capabilities. SMBs might find the full suite of Netcraft's services more extensive than their immediate DMARC needs, but businesses with significant brand value could still find its broader protection beneficial.
How does Fraudmarc compare with Netcraft Fraud Detection?
DMARC report analysis
Analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Yes, detailed
Yes, integrated
Source detection
Ability to identify legitimate and unauthorized email sending sources.
Yes, comprehensive
Yes, within DMARC
Forward detection
Capability to detect email forwarding that impacts DMARC.
Yes
Yes
Spoof detection
Identification of email impersonation and spoofing attempts.
Yes, strong DMARC
Yes, broader intelligence
Notifications and alerts
Real-time alerts for DMARC failures, threats, or changes.
Yes, customizable
Yes, extensive for threats
Reporting
Generation of compliance, threat, and operational reports.
Yes, DMARC-focused
Yes, broad security reports
API
Application Programming Interface for integration with other systems.
Yes
Yes
Multi-tenancy
Support for managing multiple clients or domains from a single interface.
Yes
Yes
SPF flattening
Tool to simplify SPF records to avoid lookup limits.
Yes
Not explicitly a core feature, may require manual
Hosted DMARC
Service to manage DMARC DNS records.
Yes
Yes
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Yes
Not a primary focus
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Yes
Not a primary focus
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring of IP and domain reputation against public blocklists.
Limited to DMARC data (blacklist)
Yes, extensive threat intelligence (blocklist)
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC configuration or analysis.
No
No
DNS monitoring
Monitoring of DNS records for security or changes.
Yes, DMARC-related
Yes, broader DNS threat monitoring
Self hostable
Option to host the software on private infrastructure.
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Free plan
Contact for trial
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Fraudmarc, while excellent for DMARC, has a more limited scope, not covering broader fraud detection or brand protection outside of email. Its user interface, though functional, may lack the modern polish some users expect. Netcraft Fraud Detection offers extensive fraud protection but can be complex to navigate, and its DMARC reporting is part of a larger suite rather than its sole focus, meaning deep DMARC specialization isn't its primary offering.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
0 / 5(0)
Pricing
Fraudmarc offers tiered DMARC reporting plans, whereas Netcraft Fraud Detection requires direct contact for pricing, indicating a more customized solution.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or Netcraft Fraud Detection?