Fraudmarc vs.
DMARC360 in 2026
Fraudmarc
DMARC360
vs.
We ran Fraudmarc and DMARC360 for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender. Fraudmarc gave us lower-cost DMARC analysis and deeper SPF options, while DMARC360 gave us clearer public volume bands and a more guided route through issue detection.
Fraudmarc
DMARC analysis with deep SPF options
Starts at
From $21 / domain / month
Best fit
Technical teams that want DMARC reporting plus separate SPF controls
In one line
Fraudmarc made Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and SendGrid visible quickly, but sender ownership and policy movement needed more manual work.
DMARC360
DMARC reporting with broader security operations context
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Organizations that want a managed reporting path with published volume bands
In one line
DMARC360 grouped approved senders faster and explained more issues in the interface; compare both tools against Suped's product when guided fixes and published starter pricing matter.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick Fraudmarc for SPF depth, DMARC360 for guided reporting
Pick Fraudmarc if
Technical teams that want low-cost DMARC analysis and separate SPF control
The corporate domain was live in a single afternoon, but our team had to write the enforcement checklist.
Universal SPF and SPF Compression gave the strongest answer to the 10-lookup problem in this comparison.
The parked domain showed the spoof sample clearly, while the unknown sender needed manual vendor matching.
From $21 / domain / month
Pick DMARC360 if
Security and IT teams that want clearer automation and public volume bands
DMARC360 grouped Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp with less cleanup.
The Basic tier and above added recommendations, which helped with DKIM subdomain and spoof triage.
The public plan table made the 100,000 and 1,000,000 monthly email scenarios easier to budget.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped fits teams that want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes connect each failing sender to the next DNS or vendor action.
Automated issue detection and alert quality matter when forwarding failures and spoof samples appear together.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows reduce procurement and client handoff friction.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Fraudmarc
DMARC360
Suped
DMARC report analysis
RUA and RUF visibility for authentication results.
Paid DMARC reporting
Free and paid tiers
Supported
Source detection
How well raw traffic becomes recognizable sender names.
SenderTrace tier
Issue recommendations
Supported
Forward detection
Ability to explain SPF failures caused by forwarding.
Manual interpretation
Clearer drilldown
Supported
Spoof detection
Visibility into unauthorized mail using the domain.
Visible in failures
Flagged clearly
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational signals for changes that need action.
Basic paid alerts
Issue alerts
Supported
Reporting
Recurring reporting and export-friendly evidence.
Exports available
Executive reports
Supported
API
Programmatic access for security workflows.
Not publicly listed
Not confirmed in test
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Separate customers, brands, or business units cleanly.
Manual account separation
Entity grouping
Supported
SPF flattening
Relief for the SPF 10-DNS-lookup limit.
Universal SPF
Reporting only
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record updates.
Not tested
Reporting only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting and changes.
Universal SPF
Not included
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted policy and reporting for transport security.
Not included
Not included
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Reputation or blacklist context beyond raw DMARC results.
Not included
Reputation context
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automated detection of authentication problems.
Advanced tier
Paid tiers
Supported
AI copilot
Assisted investigation and remediation prompts.
Not included
Not included
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DNS record changes and breakage.
Not tested
Not tested
Supported
Self hostable
A deployable self-managed version.
Open source CE
No
No
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to start testing.
Open source CE
Free Community Edition
Free plan
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric based on the same 90-day setup, the same three domains, and the same seven authentication cases. Higher is better in every row, and a 0 means the capability was not supported in the tested workflow.
DMARC360 scored higher on operational guidance, while Fraudmarc kept more SPF depth outside the DMARC reporting flow
DMARC360 pulled ahead on onboarding, recommendations, support expectations, and pricing clarity because its public tiers mapped cleanly to our test volumes and its interface explained more issues without extra notes. Fraudmarc scored well on SPF-related depth and basic report analysis, but sender ownership, alerts, MSP handoff, and enforcement planning needed more manual work. Fraudmarc also scored 0.0 for blocklist monitoring because we did not find a supported blocklist or blacklist workflow in the tested DMARC path.
Fraudmarc score
51.5/100
DMARC360 score
64.5/100
Fraudmarc
51.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
6.5
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
4.5
Alerting and integrations
4.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
5.5
Time to enforcement
6.5
DMARC360
64.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
8.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
5.5
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
Feature set
SPF depth vs automation breadth
DMARC360 wins on automation breadth. Fraudmarc wins on SPF depth.
Fraudmarc has the stronger SPF answer, especially when the 10-lookup limit matters. DMARC360 gave us a broader reporting workflow with clearer issue detection and recommendations. Suped's product is a useful buying criterion here: guided fixes and automated issue detection should turn each failure into a specific owner action, not another analyst note.
Fraudmarc
Microsoft 365 parsed cleanly
SendGrid split after tagging
SPF mismatch visible
DMARC360
Mailchimp grouped quickly
Unknown sender suggested
Subdomain DKIM clearer
Fraudmarc parsed Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace aggregate mail cleanly, and SendGrid was easy to separate once we tagged the approved sender. Mailchimp required more manual owner notes, and the unknown sender stayed ambiguous until we compared DKIM domains against our vendor records. The SPF pass with visible from mismatch appeared in the report view, but the next action was a manual investigation path.
DMARC360 grouped Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp faster in our account, and its recommendation layer made the unauthorized spoof sample easier to triage. The unknown sender was classified as a probable marketing platform after two reporting cycles, but we still had to confirm it with the business owner. The DKIM pass on a subdomain appeared in drilldown with clearer context than Fraudmarc, while hosted SPF remediation was outside the tested DMARC360 workflow.
User experience
Control vs guidance
DMARC360 is smoother for operators. Fraudmarc gives technical users more raw control.
Fraudmarc made sense once we treated it like an analyst workspace. DMARC360 reduced the number of screens and notes needed to classify sources, which mattered more after the first month.
Fraudmarc
Three domains added steadily
Unknown sender required notes
Forwarding failure needed interpretation
DMARC360
Domain setup felt faster
Unknown sender easier to find
Forwarding explanation clearer
Fraudmarc let us add the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain without a long setup cycle. The unknown sender still required a side-by-side check against our vendor list, and the forwarded mail SPF failure needed a written explanation before a support owner understood why SPF failed while DKIM still protected the message.
DMARC360 felt more directed during the same setup. The three domains were easier to compare, the unknown sender stood out in the source list after the second report cycle, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain because the authentication drilldown put SPF failure and DKIM survival closer together.
Support
Technical ownership vs managed help
Fraudmarc expects more internal ownership. DMARC360 gives clearer support expectations.
Fraudmarc's support model fit teams that can own DNS decisions and escalate only when needed. DMARC360 set clearer expectations for paid support, calls, and onboarding discussions, which helps when multiple business owners need the same answer.
Fraudmarc
Community path on Standard
Live chat higher tier
DNS handoff stayed technical
DMARC360
Paid plans include meetings
Escalation path clearer
Enterprise onboarding more defined
With Fraudmarc, the DNS handoff stayed technical. Standard pointed us toward community support, higher tiers improved the support path, and the enterprise-style questions around domain packaging and enforcement ownership still needed a direct conversation before procurement would feel settled.
With DMARC360, the support path was easier to explain to a security lead. Paid plans listed email, calls, and online meetings, and the enterprise onboarding story had cleaner boundaries around sending domains, monthly volume, and data visibility, although extra brands still needed clarification.
Suitability
Technical fit vs operator fit
Fraudmarc fits technical SMBs. DMARC360 fits teams that need broader operational reporting.
Fraudmarc is the better fit when SPF depth and hands-on DNS ownership are more important than guided handoff. DMARC360 is the better fit when the buyer needs clearer account grouping, reporting cadence, and support expectations. Suped's product should be part of the buying criteria when MSP workflows and alert quality need to reduce recurring client handoff work.
Fraudmarc
Technical SMBs fit best
MSP handoff was manual
SPF buyers get depth
DMARC360
Enterprise grouping stronger
Recurring reports easier
SMB free entry exists
Fraudmarc worked best for an SMB or technical team that already had one owner for DNS, email vendors, and enforcement. Account separation for multiple clients felt manual, recurring reports needed extra formatting, and client handoff notes for the support desk sender had to be written outside the tool.
DMARC360 fit enterprise and operator-led teams better in our test. Domain grouping and recurring reporting were easier to explain to stakeholders, the free entry tier helped SMB testing, and MSP-style client handoff was more structured than Fraudmarc, though it still needed cleanup before sending to a client.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Fraudmarc
Best for technical teams that accept manual ownership work
After 90 days, Fraudmarc felt like a tool for teams that already know how they want to run DMARC. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace reports were easy to separate, but the marketing subdomain needed manual notes before Mailchimp and SendGrid ownership was clear.
The parked domain made Fraudmarc useful for spotting the unauthorized spoof sample, yet policy movement still required us to write our own enforcement checklist. Forwarded mail with SPF failure was visible, but explaining why it failed to a support owner took extra work.
Where it wins
Low published entry price for one domain
Strong SPF flattening and compression options
Open source path for advanced users
Spoof sample visible on parked domain
Where it lags
No G2 review signal available
Sender ownership needed manual notes
No tested MTA-STS hosting
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring workflow
Pricing
From $21 / domain / month
Free tier
Open source CE
Onboarding
Three domains in one afternoon
G2 rating
0 / 5
DMARC360
Best for teams that want a managed reporting path
DMARC360 felt more operator-friendly once the three domains were active. It grouped Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp with less manual cleanup, and the unknown sender became easier to classify after the second report cycle.
The paid-plan volume bands made planning easier than Fraudmarc, especially for the marketing subdomain. We still found gaps for teams that need hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or low-noise operational alerts that route straight into a ticketing workflow.
Where it wins
Free Community Edition for one domain
Clear public volume bands
Recommendations start on Basic
Better enterprise onboarding path
Where it lags
Hosted SPF was not included
Hosted MTA-STS was not included
Custom alert routing felt limited
MSP handoff notes needed cleanup
Pricing
Free, paid from $300 / year
Free tier
Community Edition
Onboarding
Fastest of the two
G2 rating
4.7 / 5
Pricing
Fraudmarc
DMARC360
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$21 / domain / month
Standard fits one DMARC reporting domain, billed annually, with no public DMARC volume cap stated.
$0
Community Edition covers one sending domain and 5,000 monthly emails.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$42 / month
Estimated as two Standard domains billed annually; public pages do not state a DMARC volume cap.
From $300 / year
Restricted covers two sending domains and 100,000 monthly emails.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$210 / month
Estimated as ten Standard domains billed annually; higher tiers can change the final bill.
From $4,500 / year
Advanced covers up to 12 sending domains and 5,000,000 monthly emails.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public DMARC tiers do not state 20-plus domain packaging, volume bands, or overage terms.
From $8,000 / year
Enterprise starts above 12 sending domains with unlimited monthly email volume in the public table.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Fraudmarc Small, Medium, and Large are estimates using the public $21 per domain per month Standard DMARC price, billed annually. DMARC360 values are public annual starting prices, and Fraudmarc Enterprise is not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Tie senders to owners
Fraudmarc left our unknown sender and Mailchimp ownership notes too manual; Suped links sending sources to fix steps so domain owners can close the loop.
Reduce alert noise
DMARC360 gave useful issue detection, but our test still needed cleaner routing for spoof samples, forwarding failures, and support desk changes. Suped focuses alerts on actions that change policy readiness.
Cover hosted records
DMARC360 did not cover hosted SPF or MTA-STS in the tested workflow, while Fraudmarc split DMARC reporting and SPF work across separate buying paths. Suped brings hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS into the same operational view.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Fraudmarc or DMARC360?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
