Suped

Fraudmarc vs DMARC report viewer

Choose Fraudmarc for comprehensive DMARC management, or DMARC report viewer for a free, self-hostable solution.
DMARC report viewer
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc offers a robust suite of DMARC reporting and management features designed to provide clear insights into email authentication. We have found their platform excels at breaking down complex DMARC data into digestible formats, helping organizations quickly identify and mitigate email threats.
Their feature set includes detailed DMARC aggregate and forensic report analysis, source identification, and a focus on preventing email fraud. We appreciate the breadth of their offering, which goes beyond basic reporting to include tools for active policy enforcement and domain protection.
The DMARC report viewer, being an open-source project, provides a foundational set of DMARC reporting capabilities. It focuses on the essential task of parsing and visualizing DMARC aggregate reports, offering a clear overview of email authentication results for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment.
While its feature set is more streamlined compared to commercial offerings, it effectively serves the core purpose of DMARC data analysis. We find it to be a competent tool for those who prioritize control over their data and prefer a self-hostable solution for basic DMARC monitoring.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc presents a professional and intuitive user interface. Navigating through reports and settings is straightforward, even for those new to DMARC. We found the dashboards to be well-organized, providing a quick summary of domain health and DMARC compliance.
The platform's design facilitates efficient analysis, allowing us to drill down into specific data points without excessive clicking. While the initial setup requires some technical understanding of DNS, the daily use of the platform is quite user-friendly, making DMARC management less daunting.
The DMARC report viewer, given its open-source nature, has a functional but less polished user experience than commercial tools. Its interface is clean and to the point, prioritizing data display over aesthetic embellishments. Installation and initial configuration, however, require a degree of technical proficiency in server setup and scripting.
Once deployed, the tool effectively displays DMARC data, allowing for basic filtering and visualization. For users comfortable with self-hosting and command-line interfaces, the UX is entirely manageable. However, it may pose a steeper learning curve for non-technical users.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc provides dedicated customer support, which we've found to be responsive and knowledgeable. They offer assistance through various channels, including email and potentially phone support for higher-tier plans. Their team is adept at guiding users through complex DMARC configurations and troubleshooting issues.
We appreciate their willingness to go beyond basic technical assistance, often providing strategic advice on DMARC policy implementation. This level of personalized support is a significant advantage, especially for organizations with intricate email infrastructures or those seeking to accelerate their DMARC journey.
As an open-source project, the DMARC report viewer primarily relies on community support. Users can find assistance through its GitHub repository, where issues can be reported and discussions can take place. While contributors may offer help, there is no formal support channel or guaranteed response times.
This model suits users who are self-sufficient and comfortable seeking solutions within a community framework. However, organizations requiring immediate, dedicated assistance or service-level agreements (SLAs) will find this aspect lacking. It's a trade-off for the free and open nature of the software.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is best suited for organizations that require a comprehensive and managed DMARC solution. It caters well to SMBs looking for guidance, mid-sized businesses with growing email security needs, and larger enterprises seeking advanced features and dedicated support. For MSPs, it offers features that can be leveraged for client management.
Its strengths lie in its ability to handle complex domain portfolios, provide actionable insights, and streamline the path to DMARC enforcement. We see it as an excellent choice for businesses prioritizing a hands-on, expert-backed approach to email authentication.
The DMARC report viewer is ideal for technically proficient individuals or small teams who prefer a self-hosted, open-source solution. It’s particularly well-suited for developers, IT professionals, or academic institutions with the resources to deploy and maintain the tool independently. SMBs with strong internal IT capabilities might also find it appealing.
It is not typically suitable for enterprise-level deployment unless significant internal development resources are allocated for customization and scaling. MSPs looking for a robust, multi-tenant solution with commercial support will likely find it insufficient without substantial modification.

How does Fraudmarc compare with DMARC report viewer?

Logo
DMARC report viewer
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc, while a comprehensive solution, can be cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations, and its setup might require a learning curve for those unfamiliar with DMARC. The DMARC report viewer, conversely, demands significant technical expertise for deployment and maintenance, and lacks the commercial support and advanced features found in paid alternatives. Its community-driven support model might not suit all users.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC report viewer

Pricing

Fraudmarc operates on a contact-for-pricing model, while the DMARC report viewer is entirely free and open-source, requiring only self-hosting costs.
Logo
DMARC report viewer
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hostable)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hostable)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hostable)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hostable)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or DMARC report viewer?
Logo
DMARC report viewer
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions