Suped

Fraudmarc vs Agari Brand Protection

Choose Fraudmarc for focused DMARC management, or Agari Brand Protection for a comprehensive email security suite.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc provides a robust and intuitive DMARC reporting and management platform. Its core strength lies in simplifying the complex world of email authentication, offering clear insights into DMARC, SPF, and DKIM performance. We appreciate its ability to quickly identify unauthorized senders, helping to prevent email impersonation and phishing.
While Fraudmarc excels at DMARC implementation and monitoring, it focuses primarily on this domain. It offers essential features for getting to a DMARC enforcement policy, including aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) report analysis, and helps in the discovery and authorization of legitimate sending sources. For organizations looking for dedicated DMARC tooling, it certainly delivers the essentials.
Agari Brand Protection offers a broader email security platform that extends beyond DMARC reporting to encompass advanced threat detection and brand protection. We found its capabilities for identifying sophisticated phishing attacks and executive impersonation to be particularly strong, leveraging a deeper analysis of email flow and sender behavior.
Beyond DMARC, Agari Brand Protection integrates capabilities like threat intelligence, automated incident response, and executive protection. This makes it a comprehensive suite for organizations facing advanced persistent threats and requiring a holistic approach to email security. It is built to provide a wide array of security features under one umbrella.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc generally offers a straightforward user experience, especially for those primarily focused on DMARC. The interface is clean, and the DMARC reports are presented in an easy-to-digest format, which helps in quickly identifying issues and understanding sending sources. We found that navigating the platform to configure policies and monitor compliance was quite intuitive.
For users who are familiar with DMARC concepts, Fraudmarc's dashboard provides the necessary data without overwhelming complexity. While it may not have all the bells and whistles of an enterprise-grade suite, its simplicity is a definite advantage for quick setup and ongoing DMARC management. It feels like a purpose-built tool rather than a sprawling security platform.
Agari Brand Protection, given its extensive feature set, can present a steeper learning curve. The platform is powerful and offers deep customization, but this also means more options and configurations to manage. We observed that initial setup and policy fine-tuning often required a more dedicated effort and understanding of advanced email security principles.
While the user interface is well-designed for an enterprise solution, the sheer volume of data and security controls might be daunting for new users or those less experienced in the nuances of brand protection. We feel that its full potential is best unlocked with some initial training and ongoing familiarity with the platform's advanced capabilities. It is certainly a product designed for security specialists.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc provides support that aligns with its focused DMARC offering. For general DMARC questions and platform usage, we found the support team to be responsive and knowledgeable. They are well-equipped to guide users through the process of achieving DMARC enforcement and troubleshooting common issues.
The support experience tends to be more direct, focusing on specific DMARC challenges. While they may not offer the same level of white-glove service as a large enterprise security vendor, their expertise in DMARC is commendable, making them a reliable resource for their niche. We found their documentation to be a good first stop for self-help as well.
Agari Brand Protection, as an enterprise solution, typically offers comprehensive support packages designed for large organizations. This often includes dedicated account managers and specialized security experts. However, feedback from users suggests that response times can sometimes be a bit slow, particularly for less critical issues, as noted in a review.
While the depth of expertise within Agari's support team is undeniable, particularly for complex threat scenarios, the user experience can vary. For critical incidents, we would expect a rapid response, but for routine inquiries, there might be a delay. It seems to be a common trade-off with larger, more complex platforms, where the focus is often on high-impact events.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations whose primary goal is to achieve and maintain DMARC enforcement without needing a full-blown email security suite. Its focused approach makes it ideal for those who want a clear, efficient path to protecting their domain from spoofing and phishing, including those new to DMARC.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs) serving SMB clients, Fraudmarc can be a viable option, though its multi-tenancy features may not be as extensive as enterprise-grade platforms. It's less suitable for large enterprises that require advanced threat intelligence, executive protection, or broad brand monitoring capabilities beyond DMARC. Its strength lies in its specialization, not its breadth.
Agari Brand Protection is best suited for large enterprises and organizations with complex security needs, particularly those in highly regulated industries or frequently targeted by sophisticated phishing and brand impersonation attacks. Its comprehensive suite is designed to integrate deeply into existing security operations, offering a wide range of protections beyond standard DMARC.
MSPs serving enterprise clients would find Agari Brand Protection highly suitable due to its robust multi-tenancy, advanced reporting, and deep threat intelligence capabilities. It is not an ideal choice for SMBs due to its complexity and likely higher cost, which would likely be overkill for their requirements. It's for organizations where email security is a critical, multi-layered concern.

How does Fraudmarc compare with Agari Brand Protection?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc's main drawbacks stem from its specialized focus, which means it may lack the broader email security features found in more comprehensive platforms. Organizations seeking advanced threat intelligence, executive protection, or extensive brand monitoring beyond DMARC might find its capabilities limited. For Agari Brand Protection, the primary concerns are its complexity and the potential for slower support response times, as indicated by user feedback. Its enterprise-grade nature means it can be overwhelming and costly for smaller businesses.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Descent Email Security
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection? I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic. What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection? The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further. What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you? It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
Ritika D.
Senior Analyst Computer Software Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Pricing

Fraudmarc typically offers more transparent pricing options, while Agari Brand Protection, being an enterprise solution, requires direct contact for quotes.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or Agari Brand Protection?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions