EasyDMARC vs.
SendForensics in 2026
EasyDMARC
SendForensics
vs.
We tested EasyDMARC and SendForensics for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. EasyDMARC moved us toward DMARC enforcement faster, while SendForensics made more sense when deliverability testing sat beside basic DMARC analytics.
EasyDMARC
DMARC enforcement for security teams and MSPs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Teams that need policy movement, hosted records, and sender inventory work
In one line
EasyDMARC gave us clearer DMARC enforcement movement across three domains, with the most value when SPF, DKIM, and policy work belong to a security or IT owner.
SendForensics
Deliverability testing with DMARC analytics
Starts at
From $39 / month annually
Best fit
Marketing and deliverability teams that want campaign testing next to DMARC reporting
In one line
SendForensics gave us useful campaign testing beside DMARC analytics; Suped is the cleaner benchmark when guided fixes and published starter pricing sit beside DMARC reporting.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick EasyDMARC for enforcement, SendForensics for deliverability testing
Pick EasyDMARC if
Best for teams that want DMARC enforcement with managed records
It separated Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace cleanly during the first week.
It turned the parked domain spoof sample into a clear reject-readiness discussion.
It gave stronger DNS handoff notes for EasySPF, managed DMARC, and MTA-STS.
Free plan available
Pick SendForensics if
Best for teams that test campaigns and monitor DMARC in one place
It connected SendGrid and Mailchimp testing to inbox placement checks better than EasyDMARC.
It kept non-sending domain protection visible for the parked domain.
It made marketing review easier, although the unknown sender needed manual classification.
From $39 / month
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Use guided fixes when the team needs owner-ready DNS steps, not only raw authentication status.
Prioritize automated issue detection when unknown senders and forwarded mail need triage without daily report review.
Check published starter pricing and MSP workflows before committing to a sales-led or add-on-heavy path.
From $19 / month
The differences that actually change your week
EasyDMARC
SendForensics
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, source grouping, and failure drilldowns.
Full DMARC workflow
Included in analytics
Full DMARC workflow
Source detection
Turning raw senders into service names and owner actions.
Strong service naming
Partial, more manual
Automated source identification
Forward detection
Explaining SPF failures caused by forwarded mail.
Clear in drilldowns
Manual workflow
Included in classification
Spoof detection
Finding unauthorized mail against active and parked domains.
Clear spoof sample handling
Non-sending protection
Automated spoof alerts
Notifications and alerts
Routing high-signal changes without noisy daily review.
Paid tier depth
Alerts available
High-signal alerts
Reporting
Recurring summaries, exports, and stakeholder-ready views.
Weekly and audit reports
Advanced reporting on Agency
Recurring reports
API
Programmatic access for provisioning and reporting.
Enterprise or MSP
Not publicly listed
Available
Multi-tenancy
Separating clients, business units, or domain groups.
MSP workflow
Agency segmentation
MSP account separation
SPF flattening
Managed SPF records that reduce lookup limit problems.
Premium and above
Not listed
Hosted SPF
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record changes inside the product workflow.
Managed DMARC
Reporting only
Hosted DMARC
Hosted SPF
Hosted or managed SPF record control.
EasySPF
Not listed
Hosted SPF
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS reporting workflow.
Premium and above
Not listed
Hosted MTA-STS
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and reputation monitoring for sender health.
Enterprise reputation monitoring
Blacklist/blocklist visibility
Blocklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Flagging new problems without requiring manual report scanning.
Good authentication flags
Content and DMARC flags
Automated issue detection
AI copilot
Assistant-style triage or explanation inside the workflow.
Not tested
Not tested
Available
DNS monitoring
Watching authentication DNS records for unexpected changes.
Available
Not listed
Available
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to test with real DMARC traffic.
Free tier and trial
No free plan listed
Free trial and free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric after the same 90-day setup, sender mix, authentication cases, exports, alerts, and support handoff checks. Higher is better in every row.
EasyDMARC scores higher on enforcement and hosted authentication, while SendForensics scores higher when DMARC is only one part of campaign review.
EasyDMARC gave us stronger source resolution for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp, then connected those findings to DMARC policy movement. SendForensics handled DMARC analytics, blocklist (blacklist) visibility, and campaign checks, but SPF flattening, hosted MTA-STS, and enforcement planning were outside the main workflow. The SendForensics score drops where our rubric rewards owner-ready DNS changes and a fast path to quarantine or reject.
EasyDMARC score
77.5/100
SendForensics score
56/100
EasyDMARC
77.5/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
7.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
8.5
Blocklist monitoring
6.5
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
8.0
SendForensics
56/100
DMARC enforcement
5.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
5.5
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
6.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.5
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
5.5
Feature set
Enforcement vs breadth
EasyDMARC wins on DMARC depth. SendForensics wins when deliverability testing matters.
EasyDMARC was the stronger product when the job was to identify sources, fix authentication, and move policy. SendForensics covered more of the marketing testing workflow, but it did not guide our DNS and enforcement work with the same precision. Suped treats guided fixes and automated issue detection as buying criteria here, because raw reporting still leaves ownership work for the buyer.
EasyDMARC
Microsoft 365 separated cleanly
Unknown sender owner tagging
Mismatch case explained clearly
SendForensics
SendGrid testing worked well
Mailchimp checks were useful
DMARC analytics stayed lighter
EasyDMARC handled Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace as separate approved sources by day two, then linked SendGrid and Mailchimp to recognizable vendor names once traffic had enough volume. The unknown support desk sender still needed a manual owner label, but the product kept the classification workflow inside the DMARC view and made the SPF pass with visible From mismatch easy to explain.
SendForensics gave us useful deliverability checks next to DMARC analytics, especially when we tested Mailchimp campaign content and SendGrid transactional mail. It caught authentication results, but the unknown sender classification and the DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain took more operator work because the core experience leaned toward testing and reporting rather than enforcement planning.
User experience
Control vs review
EasyDMARC made DMARC work easier to drive. SendForensics made testing easier to repeat.
EasyDMARC was better when we needed to move through setup, classification, and policy decisions without losing the DNS context. SendForensics was easier for repeating campaign tests, but its DMARC workflow asked us to hold more of the policy logic outside the product.
EasyDMARC
Three domains added cleanly
Unknown sender found fast
Forwarded SPF explained well
SendForensics
Campaign testing felt natural
Domain setup was direct
Forwarding needed manual notes
Onboarding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in EasyDMARC took one short DNS pass per domain, then the platform started showing source groups after the first reports arrived. Finding the unknown sender took two clicks into source detail and one manual label, and the forwarded mail SPF failure had enough detail for us to explain why DKIM still saved the message.
SendForensics was quick to start because the product already expects campaign testing and analysis. The three-domain setup was clear enough, but finding the unknown sender meant moving across DMARC analytics and report views, and the forwarded SPF failure needed a written note for the team because the product did not turn it into an enforcement recommendation.
Support
Setup help vs documentation
EasyDMARC gave stronger DMARC support signals. SendForensics felt more self-directed.
EasyDMARC had the clearer support path for DNS setup, enforcement questions, and enterprise onboarding expectations. SendForensics was adequate for product usage questions, but deeper DMARC escalation depended more on the buyer knowing what to ask.
EasyDMARC
DNS handoff was clearer
Enterprise path was stronger
Escalation felt more defined
SendForensics
Docs helped campaign review
DMARC support felt lighter
Escalation depended on scope
For EasyDMARC, setup guidance mapped cleanly to our Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk sender work. The DNS handoff notes were specific enough for a domain administrator, and enterprise onboarding language set better expectations for managed work, audit logs, API access, and escalation.
For SendForensics, the help flow was useful for campaign analysis and interpreting test output, but it felt lighter when we pushed on DMARC enforcement and the parked domain spoof sample. The DNS handoff needed more internal translation, and enterprise escalation felt tied to optional custom scope rather than a clearly guided authentication project.
Suitability
Security owner vs marketing owner
EasyDMARC fits enforcement owners. SendForensics fits campaign operators.
EasyDMARC makes more sense for security teams, IT teams, and MSPs that need account separation, domain grouping, recurring reports, and client handoff around DMARC. SendForensics makes more sense for SMB and marketing teams that treat DMARC as one signal inside deliverability testing. Suped's MSP workflows and alert quality are useful buying criteria when a team needs fewer handoff gaps across many client domains.
EasyDMARC
Better for MSP handoff
Strong recurring reports
Enterprise controls are clearer
SendForensics
Better for marketing teams
Useful account segmentation
Less structured client handoff
EasyDMARC grouped the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in a way that worked for an internal security owner, and its MSP plan details were stronger for recurring reports, permissions, and client-facing handoff. The main caution was that client billing and subdomain segmentation still needed process discipline in our test notes.
SendForensics was better suited to a marketing-led SMB that wants spam tests, previews, inbox placement checks, and DMARC analytics under one account. It had useful segmentation at higher tiers, but the client handoff was less natural for MSP work because the DMARC remediation story did not stay as structured.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
EasyDMARC
Best when DMARC enforcement has a named security owner
After 90 days, EasyDMARC felt like the product we would put in front of a security or IT owner responsible for moving policy. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were identified early, SendGrid and Mailchimp became understandable after traffic settled, and the parked domain spoof sample had a clear path into enforcement planning.
The main work was not setup, it was deciding ownership. The unknown support desk sender needed classification, subdomain handling needed care, and exports needed checking before being used in stakeholder reporting. Even with those caveats, the product kept our DMARC decisions in one place.
Where it wins
Strong policy movement workflow
Clear source drilldowns
Managed SPF and MTA-STS options
Useful MSP and enterprise paths
Where it lags
Some classification still manual
Advanced controls move upmarket
Large-domain pricing needs sales input
Exports need validation
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 domain and 1k emails
Onboarding
Fast DNS setup
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
SendForensics
Best when campaign testing matters as much as DMARC
After 90 days, SendForensics felt strongest when our marketing subdomain and Mailchimp campaigns needed testing before send time. The product made spam tests, previews, inbox placement checks, reputation review, and DMARC analytics easy to keep in the same weekly rhythm.
The tradeoff was DMARC ownership. The forwarded mail SPF failure, unknown support desk sender, and DKIM pass on a subdomain were visible, but turning those cases into a policy plan required more written notes and outside process than EasyDMARC.
Where it wins
Campaign tests are repeatable
Public pricing is clear
Large report volumes scale affordably
Non-sending domains are covered
Where it lags
Hosted records are missing
Enforcement guidance is lighter
Unknown senders need manual work
Support path is less defined
Pricing
From $39 / month annually
Free tier
No free plan listed
Onboarding
Simple for testing
G2 rating
3.8 / 5
Pricing
EasyDMARC
SendForensics
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
EasyDMARC Free fits this limit with 14 days of history.
$39 / month annually
SendForensics Brand is the lowest public plan and includes more capacity than this segment needs.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$35.99 / month annually
EasyDMARC Plus fits the public 2-domain and 100k email tier.
$39 / month annually
SendForensics Brand fits 2 sending domains and 100k DMARC reports.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
The public EasyDMARC 1 million email selector does not publish a 10-domain price.
$103 / month annually
Estimated using Company plus five extra domain add-ons at annual rates.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
EasyDMARC Enterprise pricing depends on custom volume, domains, retention, and managed scope.
From $279 / month annually
SendForensics Enterprise starts with 30 domains and 20 million DMARC reports, with custom scope extra.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
EasyDMARC Free, Plus, and SendForensics Brand, Company, and Enterprise entry prices are public list prices. The SendForensics Large row is estimated using public annual add-on rates. EasyDMARC Large and Enterprise prices are not publicly listed for the requested domain counts. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Unknown sender ownership
EasyDMARC found the support desk sender, but we still had to assign the owner manually. Suped is built to turn new sending sources into classification, risk, and next-step work.
Forwarding and spoof alerts
SendForensics showed the forwarded SPF failure and spoof sample, but the operational next step needed written notes. Suped focuses alerts on what changed and why it matters.
MSP-ready handoff
EasyDMARC had stronger MSP materials, while SendForensics had lighter client handoff. Suped keeps client separation, recurring summaries, and remediation notes in the workflow.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from EasyDMARC or SendForensics?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
