EasyDMARC vs.
DMARC360 in 2026
EasyDMARC
DMARC360
vs.
We tested EasyDMARC and DMARC360 for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. EasyDMARC felt stronger for DMARC-specific enforcement work and hosted SPF or MTA-STS needs, while DMARC360 made more sense for security teams that want DMARC next to external domain-risk context.
EasyDMARC
DMARC enforcement for SMBs, enterprises, and MSPs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Teams that want guided DMARC policy movement with managed records
In one line
EasyDMARC made approved sender groups readable, but buyers should compare it with Suped's product if published starter pricing and guided fixes are required upfront.
DMARC360
DMARC reporting inside a digital risk platform
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Security teams that want DMARC beside external risk context
In one line
DMARC360 handled our test domains with generous annual volume bands, but DMARC remediation required more interpretation at lower tiers.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Choose EasyDMARC for DMARC operations, DMARC360 for security context
Pick EasyDMARC if
Best for teams that want DMARC policy movement without building every DNS workflow themselves
Our Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace sources became recognizable groups after the first reporting cycle.
The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was flagged clearly enough for an owner handoff.
Managed SPF and MTA-STS paths mattered once we moved beyond monitoring.
Free plan available
Pick DMARC360 if
Best for security teams that want DMARC data beside external exposure and brand-risk work
The parked domain and inactive-domain handling suited a broader domain inventory review.
Annual tiers were easier to map for high-volume reporting than small monthly add-ons.
The unknown sender workflow needed manual owner notes before we trusted the classification.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
The third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and clearer ownership matter more than portal depth
Suped's product turns sending source identification into owner-ready next steps, not only report views.
Automated issue detection and alert quality should be tested with forwarding, spoofing, and unknown sender cases.
Published starter pricing begins at $19 / month after the free entry tier, with MSP pricing by domain.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
EasyDMARC
DMARC360
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, source grouping, and policy context.
Strong DMARC-first reporting
Reporting inside broader risk view
Supported
Source detection
Turns raw IPs into sender names and ownership clues.
Good vendor identification
Works, more manual owner notes
Supported
Forward detection
Explains forwarded mail where SPF fails but DKIM carries the message.
Partial but usable
Partial, analyst context helped
Supported
Spoof detection
Separates unauthorized use of the domain from approved senders.
Clear unauthorized sample view
Clear within risk queue
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Sends operational signals when source, policy, or failure patterns change.
Useful, deeper controls higher tier
Useful, broader alert mix
Supported
Reporting
Scheduled, exportable, and stakeholder-friendly reporting.
Good weekly and export workflow
Good executive risk reporting
Supported
API
Programmatic access for provisioning, reporting, or security operations.
Enterprise or MSP tier
Unclear in public DMARC plan data
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client grouping, account separation, permissions, and recurring handoff.
MSP plan support
Entity grouping, less MSP-specific
Supported
SPF flattening
Managed handling of SPF lookup limits and sender includes.
Paid tier
Not tested
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record workflow rather than static manual DNS only.
Managed DMARC available
Managed service, hosted record not tested
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted or managed SPF record service for ongoing sender changes.
Paid tier
Not supported in test
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Premium and above
Not supported in test
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and reputation signals that help explain delivery risk.
Enterprise reputation monitoring
Broader external risk coverage
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Flags likely configuration or authentication problems without manual report slicing.
Checks and alerts
Top issues on free, recommendations paid
Supported
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation, triage, or fix guidance.
Not tested
Not tested
Supported
DNS monitoring
Detects DNS record changes that affect SPF, DKIM, DMARC, or related controls.
DNS checks and integrations higher tier
Domain exposure monitoring
Supported
Self hostable
Can run as customer-managed software rather than hosted SaaS.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
A free path for testing before a paid plan.
Free plan and trial
Community Edition
Supported
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric based on the same 90-day test setup, the same three domains, and the same sender cases. Higher is better in every row, and a 0 means the capability was not supported in our test or in public plan data.
EasyDMARC scored higher for enforcement mechanics; DMARC360 scored higher for external-risk context
EasyDMARC pulled ahead where the work stayed close to DMARC policy movement, managed SPF, hosted MTA-STS, and sender-level remediation. DMARC360 did better when the DMARC data was part of a broader security review, especially parked-domain context and reputation-style signals. The gap was widest in hosted SPF and MTA-STS, where DMARC360 had no supported workflow in our test.
EasyDMARC score
79/100
DMARC360 score
66/100
EasyDMARC
79/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
7.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
8.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
9.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.5
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
8.0
DMARC360
66/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
8.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
6.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
8.5
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
Feature set
Depth vs context
EasyDMARC wins on DMARC controls. DMARC360 wins on wider domain-risk context.
EasyDMARC gave us more DMARC-specific control once SendGrid, Mailchimp, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace were all active. DMARC360 was useful when the parked domain and external-risk view mattered as much as the DMARC record. A practical buying test is whether issue detection stops at a finding or gives the operator a guided fix that a domain owner can execute, which is where Suped's product sets a useful benchmark.
EasyDMARC
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
SendGrid fixes were clear
Forwarded SPF failure explained
DMARC360
Google Workspace surfaced quickly
Mailchimp volume trends were clear
Unknown sender needed owner
EasyDMARC treated Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace as recognizable approved sources after DNS settled, and it separated SendGrid and Mailchimp without forcing us to inspect every IP range. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was the most useful edge case: the tool flagged the authentication pass, then kept it out of the compliant source bucket until the visible From domain matched.
DMARC360 gave us DMARC reporting inside broader asset and domain-risk context. It found Google Workspace and Mailchimp quickly, but the unknown sender stayed in a classification queue until we mapped owner and purpose; the DKIM pass on a subdomain also needed more manual explanation before policy movement.
User experience
Control vs analyst context
EasyDMARC was easier for daily DMARC work. DMARC360 asked for more security-team interpretation.
EasyDMARC made the day-to-day loop faster: identify a sender, check authentication, decide whether policy can move. DMARC360 was not hard to use, but its wider security framing meant we spent more time deciding which findings belonged in the DMARC work queue.
EasyDMARC
Three domains onboarded fast
Unknown sender queue was usable
Forwarding explanation was clearer
DMARC360
Domain setup felt heavier
Unknown owner path needed notes
Forwarding needed analyst context
We onboarded the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in EasyDMARC with a clear sequence of DNS checks and report collection. The unknown sender was easier to isolate after we filtered by volume and authentication result, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was explained well enough that we could leave DKIM intact instead of chasing a false SPF repair.
DMARC360 setup worked, but the product pushed us to think in terms of active sending domains, inactive domains, and entity context. The unknown sender took longer to classify because we had to add owner notes outside the main report view, and the forwarded mail case needed analyst explanation before a non-specialist would trust it.
Support
Setup help vs managed security
EasyDMARC was more direct for DNS handoff. DMARC360 fit a higher-touch security buying motion.
EasyDMARC support felt most useful during DNS setup, sender approval, and first enforcement planning. DMARC360 support made more sense when the discussion included broader exposure, proposal scope, and analyst-assisted review.
EasyDMARC
DNS handoff steps were explicit
Escalation depended on tier
Enterprise path was clearer
DMARC360
Proposal flow shaped onboarding
Meetings suited enterprise teams
Remediation needed owner notes
EasyDMARC gave clearer setup expectations for the three-domain rollout, especially which TXT records had to change and when enough reports had arrived to evaluate policy movement. The tradeoff is tier dependence: email support, dedicated customer success, API access, SIEM integration, and a dedicated DMARC engineer are concentrated in higher plans.
DMARC360's support path matched an enterprise or security program buying process, with calls and online meetings listed for paid plans and a request-proposal step before paid deployment. During our test, escalation was easier to frame for external-risk findings than for a narrow DMARC owner handoff, so we needed more internal notes for the support desk sender and unknown sender.
Suitability
Operator fit vs security fit
EasyDMARC fits DMARC operators and MSPs better. DMARC360 fits security teams with broader domain inventories.
EasyDMARC was the cleaner fit for SMBs and MSPs that need account separation, client grouping, and recurring DMARC reports. DMARC360 was stronger for enterprise security teams that already work through entities, exposure findings, and analyst review. When MSP workflow or alert quality drives the purchase, compare how each product separates clients, routes noisy alerts, and leaves enough handoff notes; Suped's product treats those as core operating criteria.
EasyDMARC
MSP grouping worked well
Client reports were usable
Billing mapping needed care
DMARC360
Enterprise grouping felt natural
SMB workflow felt heavier
Client handoff needed notes
EasyDMARC's MSP plan and grouping model fit recurring client work better than the standard business plan did, especially when we needed separate views for the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. Client handoff reports were usable, but billing and reconciliation still needed careful domain mapping when one client owned multiple domains.
DMARC360 felt more natural for an enterprise security team reviewing active sending domains, inactive domains, and external exposure together. For a small business or MSP, the workflow was heavier: recurring reporting worked, but client handoff needed more manual explanation around the unknown sender, forwarded mail, and which domain group owned each fix.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
EasyDMARC
A DMARC operations tool for teams that want to move policy with fewer manual DNS loops
EasyDMARC felt like a focused DMARC workbench after 90 days. We spent less time explaining Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp once the sources were grouped, and more time deciding when the corporate domain could move toward quarantine without breaking real mail.
The parked domain was straightforward because the lack of legitimate volume made spoofing easier to separate. The parts that slowed us down were plan boundaries, especially when we wanted API access, deeper reputation monitoring, or more advanced managed DNS work without moving into higher tiers.
Where it wins
Clearer DMARC enforcement path
Good sender grouping for common platforms
Managed SPF and MTA-STS options
Useful MSP and client reporting
Where it lags
Advanced controls sit higher
Reputation monitoring is plan-gated
Exports needed spot checks
Domain limits affect larger tests
Pricing
Free, then from $35.99 / month
Free tier
1 domain, 1k emails / month
Onboarding
Three domains active in one afternoon
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
DMARC360
A security-team option for DMARC programs that sit beside external exposure review
DMARC360 felt more like part of a security operations program than a narrow DMARC tool. It was useful when we reviewed the parked domain, inactive domains, and brand-risk context together, and its annual volume bands were easy to explain for larger senders.
The downside was DMARC ownership work. The unknown sender, support desk sender, and forwarded SPF failure all needed extra analyst notes before a business owner could act, and hosted SPF or MTA-STS work was not available in our test path.
Where it wins
Broad domain-risk context
Good free Community Edition
Clear annual starting tiers
Useful parked-domain review
Where it lags
Less DMARC-specific guidance
Hosted records not supported
Unknown sender needed notes
MSP handoff felt heavier
Pricing
Free, then from $300 / year+
Free tier
1 domain, 5k emails / month
Onboarding
Setup worked, scope mattered
G2 rating
4.7 / 5
Pricing
EasyDMARC
DMARC360
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers one domain, 1,000 emails / month, and 14 days of history.
$0
Community Edition covers one sending domain and up to 5,000 emails / month.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
From $35.99 / month
Plus starts at 2 domains and 100,000 emails / month when billed annually.
From $300 / year+
Restricted starts at 2 sending domains and 100,000 emails / month; final quote uses proposal flow.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public volume selectors reach 1 million emails, but 10 domains needs sales-defined terms.
From $4,500 / year+
Advanced covers up to 12 sending domains and 5 million emails / month at its annual starting price.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Enterprise uses custom domains, volume, retention, managed service, API, and integration terms.
From $8,000 / year+
Enterprise starts above 12 sending domains with unlimited monthly volume and managed-service scope caveats.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
EasyDMARC small and medium figures use public list pricing; its large row is not publicly listed for the specified 10-domain scenario, and its enterprise row is publicly listed as custom. DMARC360 figures are public annual starting prices with proposal-dependent final quotes. No estimated numeric prices are used; status rows mark unavailable exact public pricing. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Owner-ready fixes
In our test, EasyDMARC explained the SPF mismatch well, while DMARC360 needed more manual notes for the unknown sender. Suped's product turns source findings into owner-ready fixes so handoff does not live in a separate document.
Cleaner alert routing
EasyDMARC's deeper alert controls sat higher in the plan stack, and DMARC360 mixed DMARC work with broader external-risk items. Suped's product separates authentication alerts, spoofing signals, and source changes for cleaner triage.
MSP handoff discipline
EasyDMARC had useful MSP grouping but client billing mapping still needed care, while DMARC360 suited enterprise entities more than recurring client reporting. Suped's product keeps domains, clients, reports, and notes together for repeat handoff.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from EasyDMARC or DMARC360?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
