EasyDMARC vs.
DMARC-SRG in 2026
EasyDMARC
DMARC-SRG
vs.
We tested EasyDMARC and DMARC-SRG for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. We ran domain-matched SPF and DKIM passes, an SPF pass with visible From mismatch, a subdomain DKIM pass, forwarded mail with SPF failure, an unauthorized spoof sample, and one unknown sender. EasyDMARC gave us a fuller managed DMARC path, while DMARC-SRG worked best as a self-hosted report viewer for teams that already know how to run the process themselves.
EasyDMARC
Managed DMARC enforcement
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Security and IT teams that want guided policy movement
In one line
EasyDMARC turned our three-domain test into a clear enforcement queue, with stronger sender naming and more managed record options than DMARC-SRG.
DMARC-SRG
Open-source DMARC report viewer
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical operators comfortable owning hosting, parsing, and interpretation
In one line
DMARC-SRG parsed aggregate reports reliably, but left sender ownership, policy decisions, alerting, and support handoff to our own process; Suped's product is the comparison point when guided fixes and sending source identification need to be built in.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick EasyDMARC for managed DMARC, DMARC-SRG for self-hosted control
Pick EasyDMARC if
Best for teams that want a guided path to enforcement
It identified Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly and separated them cleanly from SendGrid and Mailchimp.
It gave us practical policy movement prompts after the spoof sample and forwarded SPF failure were understood.
It made DNS setup easier for the primary domain and marketing subdomain, though parked-domain noise still needed review.
Free plan available
Pick DMARC-SRG if
Best for technical teams that want a free self-hosted parser
It ingested aggregate reports and made raw SPF and DKIM outcomes searchable by domain and reporter.
It kept all data in our own MariaDB setup, which helped when we wanted full hosting control.
It exposed the forwarded SPF failure, but did not explain ownership or next steps without manual analysis.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped when guided fixes and hosted records make ownership simpler
Guided fixes turn unknown senders and authentication failures into owner-ready actions.
Automated issue detection and higher-signal alerts cover spoofing, forwarding, and source changes.
Published starter pricing shows business plans from $19 / month and MSP pricing from $7 / domain.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
EasyDMARC
DMARC-SRG
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate parsing, grouping, and drilldown quality.
Supported with dashboards and drilldowns
Supported as reporting only
Supported
Source detection
Ability to turn raw IPs into known senders.
Strong sender naming
Manual workflow
Supported
Forward detection
Handling of forwarded mail with SPF failure.
Partial but useful
Visible, manual interpretation
Supported
Spoof detection
Highlighting unauthorized mail that fails authentication.
Supported
Visible in raw results
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for changes and failures.
Paid tier controls
Manual workflow
Supported
Reporting
Scheduled or exportable reporting for stakeholders.
Weekly reports and exports
Summary reports
Supported
API
Programmatic access for automation.
Enterprise or MSP
Not published
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client or business-unit separation.
MSP and group workflows
Manual account separation
Supported
SPF flattening
Help for SPF lookup-limit management.
Premium and above
Not supported
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting.
Supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting.
Premium and above
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS and TLS reporting workflow.
Premium and above
Not supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) or reputation monitoring.
Enterprise or MSP
Not supported
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automatic flagging of likely configuration and sender issues.
Partial
Manual workflow
Supported
AI copilot
AI help for interpreting and fixing issues.
Not tested
Not supported
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring DNS records for drift or risky changes.
Supported
Not supported
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the reporting system on your own infrastructure.
Hosted SaaS
Self hostable
Hosted SaaS
Free trial/free tier
No-cost entry option for testing.
Free plan and trial
$0 self-hosted software
Free plan
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric built around policy movement, source resolution, setup, alerts, hosted records, blocklist and blacklist monitoring, pricing clarity, and support. Higher is better in every row.
EasyDMARC scores higher on managed DMARC work, while DMARC-SRG scores where self-hosted reporting is enough.
EasyDMARC earned stronger scores because it named Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp with fewer manual checks, then connected those findings to policy movement. DMARC-SRG parsed the same reports and exposed authentication outcomes, but we had to classify the unknown sender, explain the forwarded SPF failure, and build our own alerting and handoff notes. DMARC-SRG scored zero where the product did not support the capability, including blocklist monitoring, hosted records, and API access.
EasyDMARC score
75.5/100
DMARC-SRG score
20.5/100
EasyDMARC
75.5/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
7.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
7.0
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
8.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.5
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
8.0
DMARC-SRG
20.5/100
DMARC enforcement
3.0
Customer support
0.0
Source resolution
2.5
Setup and onboarding
4.0
MSP workflows
0.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
3.0
Feature set
Managed depth vs raw control
EasyDMARC has the broader feature set. DMARC-SRG has a focused parser.
EasyDMARC gave us more practical coverage across sender identification, hosted SPF, managed MTA-STS, alerts, and enforcement work. DMARC-SRG did the core report parsing job, but the buyer should budget for separate guided fixes or automated issue detection if non-specialists need to act on the findings.
EasyDMARC
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
Mailchimp subdomain DKIM visible
Unknown sender partly classified
DMARC-SRG
Google Workspace rows searchable
SendGrid visible after filtering
Forwarded SPF failure exposed
EasyDMARC mapped Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace as approved corporate senders within the first reporting cycle, then separated SendGrid and Mailchimp traffic by source and subdomain. The DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain was easy to verify, and the unknown sender was grouped close enough to investigate without exporting raw XML first. The product felt strongest when a result needed an action, such as moving a known sender into the approved list or checking whether the parked domain could move closer to reject.
DMARC-SRG gave us the raw material: reporter, source IP, DKIM result, SPF result, and date filters. It showed the SendGrid and Mailchimp patterns after we knew what to look for, and it made the forwarded mail SPF failure visible in the row data. It did not turn the unknown sender into a service name, did not create a fix path, and did not include hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, blocklist or blacklist monitoring, or proactive alerting.
User experience
Guidance vs ownership
EasyDMARC is easier for mixed teams. DMARC-SRG suits operators who like logs.
EasyDMARC reduced setup friction and made the next action easier to find, though some deeper views felt dense once all three domains were active. DMARC-SRG was predictable after installation, but the experience assumed we already knew how to read each authentication case.
EasyDMARC
Three domains onboarded cleanly
Unknown sender easier to chase
Forwarding context was clearer
DMARC-SRG
Self-hosted setup required care
Filters stayed predictable
Forwarding needed manual explanation
EasyDMARC took us through DNS setup for the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain with fewer context switches than a manual record workflow. Finding the unknown sender took roughly 15 minutes because we could move between source views, authentication results, and reporter details without leaving the product. Explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure still required DMARC knowledge, but the interface gave enough DKIM context to avoid treating it as spoofing.
DMARC-SRG required more setup work before the product became useful: PHP, database, mailbox ingestion, cleanup settings, and web access all had to be maintained. Once reports were flowing, the filters were direct and fast enough for our test volume, but finding the unknown sender took repeated IP checks outside the workflow. The forwarded SPF failure appeared as a failed SPF row, and we had to write the explanation for stakeholders ourselves.
Support
Vendor help vs community ownership
EasyDMARC has a real support path. DMARC-SRG depends on internal expertise.
EasyDMARC is the safer fit when DNS handoff, escalation, and enterprise onboarding need named ownership. DMARC-SRG has no commercial support path in the product information we reviewed, so support quality depends on the team running it.
EasyDMARC
DNS handoff was workable
Escalation path was clearer
Enterprise options are published
DMARC-SRG
Community-style support model
Operator owns DNS notes
No enterprise onboarding path
EasyDMARC gave us enough setup guidance to hand DNS changes to an infrastructure owner without rewriting every record from scratch. The strongest support fit showed up when we needed to explain the support desk sender and decide whether the parked domain should stay at monitoring or move toward enforcement. Enterprise onboarding is clearer than DMARC-SRG because EasyDMARC publishes the advanced capabilities tied to Enterprise and MSP plans, including API, SSO, audit logs, SIEM integrations, and managed support options.
DMARC-SRG behaved like open-source infrastructure: useful, inspectable, and dependent on the operator. DNS handoff had to be written by us, escalation meant checking deployment logs and report ingestion, and there was no onboarding sequence for an enterprise buyer. That is acceptable for a team that wants control, but it creates a support gap when a marketing owner or service desk manager needs a plain-language answer.
Suitability
Managed teams vs technical operators
EasyDMARC fits teams moving policy. DMARC-SRG fits teams building their own workflow.
EasyDMARC is better for SMB, enterprise, and MSP buyers that need repeatable reports, account separation, and a path to stricter policy. DMARC-SRG fits a technical operator who wants a free parser and accepts manual handoff. Buyers comparing both should treat MSP workflows and alert quality as core requirements, not add-ons to consider later.
EasyDMARC
Good SMB enforcement path
MSP plan needs validation
Reports support client handoff
DMARC-SRG
Best for technical admins
Client grouping is manual
Reports need outside context
EasyDMARC worked best when we treated the three domains as assets with different owners: corporate IT, marketing operations, and security. Grouping and permission controls were useful for separating the marketing subdomain from the parked domain, and recurring reports were readable enough for an executive or client handoff after some cleanup. MSP fit is strongest on the dedicated MSP plan, though buyers still need to confirm client grouping, billing reconciliation, and integration requirements before committing.
DMARC-SRG suited the technical side of the test but not the handoff side. It could separate domains through filters and database-backed report views, but account separation, client grouping, recurring reports, and ownership notes had to be built around it. For an SMB with one technical admin, that tradeoff can make sense; for an MSP or enterprise team, the missing workflow layer becomes daily work.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
EasyDMARC
For teams that want DMARC progress without building the workflow
After 90 days, EasyDMARC felt like a product built for teams that need to explain DMARC to more than one stakeholder. The corporate domain became readable quickly, the marketing subdomain had enough detail to verify DKIM on Mailchimp, and the parked domain showed why a low-volume domain still needs enforcement planning.
The product was strongest when translating a report into a decision. We could mark Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace as expected sources, investigate the support desk sender, and separate the unauthorized spoof sample from forwarded mail. The weaker moments were around cost boundaries, deeper report customization, and confirming which advanced workflows required higher tiers.
Where it wins
Clearer sender classification
Useful policy movement prompts
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS options
Good stakeholder reporting
Where it lags
Some advanced capabilities sit higher
Exports need careful checking
MSP billing fit needs confirmation
Dense views need tuning
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 domain, 1k emails
Onboarding
Guided SaaS setup
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
DMARC-SRG
For operators who want a free parser they can host themselves
After 90 days, DMARC-SRG felt dependable for reading aggregate reports once the infrastructure was running. We could filter by domain and reporting organization, inspect SPF and DKIM outcomes, and keep the data in our own environment.
The daily cost was interpretation. The unknown sender required manual classification, the forwarded SPF failure needed our own explanation, and no built-in alerting told us when the spoof sample appeared. It worked as a report viewer, but it did not act like a managed DMARC program.
Where it wins
Free software license
Self-hosted data control
Straightforward report filters
No subscription feature gates
Where it lags
No managed support path
No proactive alerting
No hosted DNS records
Manual source classification
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Self-hosted software
Onboarding
Manual deployment
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
EasyDMARC
DMARC-SRG
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 domain, 1,000 emails / month, 14 days of history, and 1 user.
$0
Software is free when self-hosted, with infrastructure and admin time paid separately.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$44.99 / month
Plus starts here monthly, or $35.99 / month when billed annually.
$0
No published volume cap, but capacity depends on server, database, and ingestion settings.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Premium 1 million email selector pricing is public, but 10 domains likely needs custom terms.
$0
No paid tier was found; storage, backups, monitoring, and maintenance remain self-managed.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Enterprise pricing covers custom domain count, high volume, API, SSO, audit logs, and managed options.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No commercial enterprise tier or paid support plan was found.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
EasyDMARC Free, Plus, Premium starting prices, and Enterprise status are public list prices checked as of May 15, 2026. EasyDMARC 1 million email pricing uses public selector snippets and 10-domain fit is estimated because published business tiers include fewer domains before custom terms. DMARC-SRG pricing reflects $0 software cost for self-hosting, with infrastructure and administrator costs excluded.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Unknown senders need ownership
EasyDMARC helped us narrow the unknown sender, but ownership still needed review. Suped turns sender identification into guided next steps so the right team can approve, fix, or remove the source.
Self-hosted reports need alerts
DMARC-SRG exposed the spoof sample only after we checked the reports. Suped adds automated issue detection and alert routing so risky source changes do not depend on manual report review.
MSP handoff needs structure
EasyDMARC had MSP capabilities, while DMARC-SRG required outside process for client grouping and handoff. Suped keeps account separation, recurring reporting, and owner notes in the DMARC workflow.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from EasyDMARC or DMARC-SRG?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
