EasyDMARC vs.
Agari Brand Protection in 2026
EasyDMARC
Agari Brand Protection
vs.
We tested EasyDMARC and Agari Brand Protection for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender. EasyDMARC gave us faster source cleanup and a clearer path for smaller teams and MSPs, while Agari Brand Protection made more sense for enterprise teams that need formal brand abuse and security program workflows.
Published 6 Nov 2025
Updated 3 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
EasyDMARC
DMARC reporting for SMBs and MSPs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMBs, agencies, and MSPs that need hands-on DMARC cleanup
In one line
EasyDMARC turned our Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic into recognizable sources quickly, but policy movement still needed operator judgment.
Agari Brand Protection
Enterprise DMARC and brand protection
Starts at
Not publicly listed
Best fit
Large security teams with procurement, legal, and brand abuse workflows
In one line
Agari Brand Protection treated DMARC as part of a wider security program, and buying teams should compare it with Suped's product when guided fixes, clear source ownership, and published starter pricing are hard requirements.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick EasyDMARC for operator-led DMARC, Agari for enterprise security programs
Pick EasyDMARC if
Best for teams that want self-serve DMARC cleanup with MSP options
We added the three domains quickly and had readable DNS tasks within the first session.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were grouped cleanly after reports landed.
SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic needed manual owner labels but stayed easy to review.
Free plan available
Pick Agari Brand Protection if
Best for enterprise teams that already run formal security and brand abuse workflows
Enterprise onboarding fit our corporate domain better than the parked domain.
Security-oriented review made the unauthorized spoof sample easy to escalate.
The unknown sender sat inside a heavier workflow that expected a trained security owner.
Not publicly listed
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes turn failed SPF, DKIM, and DMARC cases into owner-ready tasks.
Automated issue detection caught spoof and unknown-source changes without noisy daily triage.
Published starter pricing and MSP domain pricing keep scoping clearer before sales calls.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
EasyDMARC
Agari Brand Protection
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Turns aggregate reports into domains, sources, pass rates, and policy signals.
Supported across public paid tiers, with short retention on Free.
Supported for enterprise DMARC programs.
Supported
Source detection
Identifies services behind Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, ESP, and support traffic.
Strong for common senders; manual labels improved the unknown sender.
Supported through cloud email intelligence, with heavier review.
Supported
Forward detection
Explains forwarded mail where SPF fails but DKIM still passes DMARC.
Partial; the signal was visible but explanation was manual.
Partial; enterprise review captured it, but it was not self-serve clear.
Supported
Spoof detection
Flags unauthorized mail using the protected visible From domain.
Supported; our spoof sample surfaced in failure views.
Supported; escalation path was stronger.
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Sends useful notices without burying operators in repeat noise.
Supported; advanced routing sits in higher tiers.
Supported for enterprise alerting and security workflows.
Supported
Reporting
Produces recurring reports, exports, and executive-ready summaries.
Supported; exports needed review for filtered views.
Supported, with enterprise reporting emphasis.
Supported
API
Gives programmatic access for automation and external reporting.
Paid tier; API access is Enterprise or MSP.
Supported for SIEM and SOAR workflows.
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Separates clients, domains, permissions, and recurring handoff reports.
Supported through MSP partner workflows.
Not positioned for MSP client tenancy in our test.
Supported
SPF flattening
Manages SPF lookup limits through a maintained flattened or hosted record.
Paid tier; EasySPF starts on Premium.
Supported through EasySPF automation.
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Lets the platform manage DMARC record changes and policy movement.
Supported through managed DMARC.
Supported through hosted DMARC.
Supported
Hosted SPF
Lets the platform manage SPF records instead of manual DNS edits.
Paid tier through EasySPF.
Supported through hosted SPF record management.
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosts MTA-STS policy and reporting workflow for TLS enforcement.
Paid tier; managed MTA-STS starts on Premium.
Not confirmed in the public product scope we reviewed.
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Covers blocklist (blacklist) or reputation monitoring that informs delivery risk.
Paid tier; reputation monitoring is Enterprise or MSP.
No dedicated blocklist monitoring found in the reviewed scope.
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Turns new failures, unknown sources, and policy risks into prioritized issues.
Partial; alerts help, but owner next steps still need review.
Supported for new sender and threat review.
Supported
AI copilot
Provides AI-assisted explanation, triage, or remediation guidance.
Not found in the reviewed product scope.
Not found in the reviewed product scope.
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records for drift, missing entries, and risky changes.
Supported through authentication tools and managed records.
Supported through hosted record management.
Supported
Self hostable
Allows the customer to run the reporting platform on its own infrastructure.
Not self hostable.
Not self hostable.
Not self hostable
Free trial/free tier
Lets buyers test the product before paid commitment.
Free plan and free trial available.
No public free trial or free version found.
Supported
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric using the same 90-day setup, sender set, authentication cases, and review checklist. Higher is better in every row.
EasyDMARC scores higher for operator speed; Agari Brand Protection scores higher for enterprise process
EasyDMARC gave our team faster source names and clearer DNS tasks across the three domains, especially for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp. Agari Brand Protection handled the spoof sample and enterprise escalation path more formally, but setup and pricing required more sales and services context. EasyDMARC lost points where advanced integrations and account controls moved into higher tiers; Agari lost points where self-serve reporting, MSP separation, hosted MTA-STS, and blocklist (blacklist) monitoring were not clear or not present.
EasyDMARC score
78/100
Agari Brand Protection score
52/100
EasyDMARC
78/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
7.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
7.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
8.5
Blocklist monitoring
6.5
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
8.0
Agari Brand Protection
52/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
6.0
MSP workflows
0.0
Alerting and integrations
8.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
6.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
2.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
Feature set
Source clarity vs security scope
EasyDMARC wins the everyday DMARC work; Agari wins broader enterprise security scope
EasyDMARC gave us more usable day-to-day DMARC evidence for the three-domain test. Agari Brand Protection had stronger enterprise security context around the spoof sample, but the DMARC operator work took more translation. One buying criterion we would carry into a Suped comparison is guided fixes: when the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure appeared, the useful output was owner-ready work, not another table of raw events.
EasyDMARC
Microsoft 365 grouped fast
SendGrid and Mailchimp labels
Forwarded SPF explained manually
Agari Brand Protection
Spoof escalation was clearer
Unknown sender review heavier
Google Workspace evidence held
EasyDMARC mapped Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly, then let us label SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender without losing the domain-level trend view. The unknown sender appeared as a source we had to classify, not an already resolved business owner. The forwarded mail case was visible because SPF failed while DKIM still passed DMARC, but we had to write the explanation before handing it to a non-specialist.
Agari Brand Protection treated the same evidence with a security program lens. The unauthorized spoof sample had a clearer escalation trail, and Microsoft 365 evidence connected well to the enterprise review flow. SendGrid, Mailchimp, Google Workspace, and the unknown sender were all reviewable, but the product felt more tuned for security teams than for weekly sender cleanup by an MSP or SMB operator.
User experience
Control vs guidance
EasyDMARC is easier to operate; Agari expects a security program
EasyDMARC was faster for the people doing the weekly work: add domains, check DNS, classify senders, and move the policy when the data looks clean. Agari Brand Protection gave more enterprise control, but smaller domains and routine sender review felt heavier than necessary.
EasyDMARC
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender needed labeling
Forwarded SPF needed context
Agari Brand Protection
Corporate domain fit best
Unknown sender path formal
Forwarding explanation less obvious
Onboarding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in EasyDMARC was straightforward. The DNS setup screens were direct enough for a domain owner handoff, and the first reports made Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace easy to separate. The unknown sender took manual classification, and the forwarded SPF failure needed an operator note before it was clear to the marketing owner.
Agari Brand Protection made the corporate domain feel like the center of the deployment. That worked well for enterprise review, especially when we needed to explain the spoof sample to a security owner. The marketing subdomain and parked domain took more clicks to understand, and the forwarded SPF failure was less obvious for a non-DMARC operator.
Support
Setup help vs enterprise handoff
EasyDMARC helps faster at setup; Agari fits formal onboarding
EasyDMARC's support model fit our DNS handoff and initial setup questions better, especially when we needed practical records for the three domains. Agari Brand Protection fit an enterprise purchase where professional services, escalation paths, and security ownership are planned before rollout.
EasyDMARC
DNS tasks were specific
Email support fit setup
Escalation varied by tier
Agari Brand Protection
Professional services expected
Enterprise handoff was structured
Slow answers need planning
EasyDMARC gave us specific DNS tasks for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and the hosted record options we tested. That made the setup handoff easier for the primary domain and parked domain. The tradeoff is tier sensitivity: deeper integrations, dedicated engineering, and some escalation paths live higher in the plan structure, so support expectations need to be set before a serious enforcement project.
Agari Brand Protection expected a more formal enterprise onboarding motion. That helped when we framed the spoof sample as an incident-style review and asked who would own escalation. It was slower for routine questions about the marketing subdomain, and a buyer without a defined security owner would need more internal coordination before deployment.
Suitability
Operator fit vs enterprise fit
EasyDMARC fits operators and MSPs; Agari fits enterprise security teams
EasyDMARC is the better fit when the same team has to classify sources, run recurring reports, and hand findings to clients or business owners. Agari Brand Protection is a better fit when DMARC sits inside an enterprise security program with procurement, incident review, and brand abuse ownership. Suped's product belongs in the shortlist when MSP workflows or alert quality decide the purchase, because the test showed how quickly noisy alerts and weak client handoff slow real enforcement work.
EasyDMARC
MSP grouping works well
Client reports need review
SMB setup felt practical
Agari Brand Protection
Enterprise governance fit better
MSP handoff was thin
Recurring reports needed tuning
EasyDMARC fit our SMB and MSP-style work because domains were easy to group, reports were readable, and recurring client handoff was practical after we cleaned up labels for SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender. Account separation was strongest in the MSP path rather than the basic business plans. For a small internal IT team, the product had enough guidance to move the corporate domain forward without building a full security process first.
Agari Brand Protection fit enterprise work better than MSP or SMB workflows in our test. Account separation and domain grouping made more sense when tied to internal security ownership, not client billing or monthly MSP reporting. Recurring reporting worked for leadership review, but client handoff around the parked domain and marketing subdomain needed more translation.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
EasyDMARC
Best for hands-on DMARC operators and MSPs
After 90 days, EasyDMARC felt like a tool we could keep open during weekly DMARC cleanup. The primary corporate domain showed the most useful trend lines, the marketing subdomain made SendGrid and Mailchimp ownership clear after labeling, and the parked domain stayed quiet enough for spoof checks.
The weak spot was the amount of operator review still needed. The forwarded SPF failure was visible, but we had to explain why DKIM kept DMARC passing; the unknown sender also needed a manual classification before reports became clean.
Where it wins
Fast three-domain onboarding
Clear Microsoft 365 grouping
Useful SendGrid and Mailchimp labels
Practical weekly exports
Where it lags
Unknown sender needed manual owner
Forwarding explanation needed operator notes
Advanced integrations tied to Enterprise
Domain limits change plan choice
Pricing
$0 or from $35.99 / month annually
Free tier
Yes, 1 domain and 1k emails
Onboarding
Three domains live same day
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
Agari Brand Protection
Best for enterprise security and brand protection teams
After 90 days, Agari Brand Protection felt like an enterprise control plane. The corporate domain got the most value because the spoof sample, suspicious sender review, and escalation notes fit a security team workflow.
The marketing subdomain and parked domain felt heavier than needed. We had to translate more of the DMARC evidence for operators, and the unknown sender classification took longer because the workflow assumed formal review.
Where it wins
Strong spoof escalation path
Enterprise reporting structure
Security-team ownership model
Microsoft 365 threat context
Where it lags
No public current price
No free trial found
MSP client handoff felt thin
Small domains felt over-scoped
Pricing
Not publicly listed
Free tier
No public free tier
Onboarding
Services-led enterprise setup
G2 rating
4.0 / 5
Pricing
EasyDMARC
Agari Brand Protection
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free plan covers 1 domain, 1k emails per month, and 14 days of history.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Current pricing was not listed for this small segment.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$35.99 / month
Plus annual starting price covers 2 domains and 100k emails per month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Current pricing was not listed; historical public tiers were enterprise-scale.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Public paid tiers stop below 10 included domains, so this segment needs custom terms.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Historical standalone MSRP began at $95,750 / year, but current live pricing was not listed.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Enterprise covers custom domain count, high volume, longer retention, and advanced integrations.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise pricing depends on deployment scope, volume, integrations, and services needs.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
EasyDMARC $0 and $35.99 / month are public list prices. EasyDMARC large and enterprise rows use custom status because public self-serve domain limits do not match 10+ domain segments. Agari current pricing was not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026; historical standalone MSRP began at $95,750 / year, so we did not treat it as current list pricing. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026 for this comparison.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Owner-ready fixes
EasyDMARC identified our senders quickly, but the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure still needed manual notes. Suped turns those cases into guided fixes with clear owner and DNS actions.
Practical MSP handoff
Agari Brand Protection fit enterprise workflows, but MSP client handoff and recurring reporting felt thin in our test. Suped's MSP workflow keeps client grouping, scheduled reporting, and per-domain billing in one operating model.
Clearer buying path
Agari's current pricing was not publicly listed, and EasyDMARC's advanced controls moved into higher tiers. Suped publishes starter pricing, includes a free plan, and gives teams a clearer first estimate before procurement.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from EasyDMARC or Agari Brand Protection?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
