Suped

DMARCPal vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer

Choose DMARCPal for a managed DMARC solution, or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer if you prefer open-source self-hosting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
A managed DMARC reporting service, DMARCPal focuses on automating DMARC data collection and analysis. It provides an intuitive dashboard for visualizing aggregate reports, helping users understand their email authentication status and identify potential issues. The platform aims to simplify the DMARC journey for businesses.
It automatically processes DMARC aggregate reports, offering insights into SPF and DKIM authentication results, as well as DMARC alignment. This allows for clear visibility into email sending sources and their compliance with DMARC policies. The tools provided assist in the ongoing management and enforcement of DMARC.
As an open-source solution, this report viewer requires self-hosting, giving users complete control over their data and infrastructure. It is built for those who are technically proficient and comfortable with server management, providing raw DMARC aggregate report parsing capabilities.
The primary function of the Techsneeze viewer is to parse and display DMARC aggregate XML reports. It provides a visual representation of DMARC data, breaking down authentication results, IP sources, and sending domains. Users gain granular insight into their DMARC ecosystem, but the setup and maintenance are entirely their responsibility.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found DMARCPal's user interface to be polished and straightforward. The onboarding process is guided, and the dashboards are well-organized, making it easy to navigate through reports and analytics. It is designed for users who prefer a hands-off approach to DMARC data management.
The visual summaries are clear, and the platform minimizes the need for manual intervention, which is a significant advantage for those less experienced with the intricacies of DMARC. Setting up new domains and configuring reporting is typically a streamlined process, reflecting its commercial product nature.
The Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer offers a functional, albeit more basic, user experience. Installation requires technical expertise, involving server setup, database configuration, and PHP environment knowledge. Once set up, the interface presents the DMARC data in a clear, no-frills manner.
Its strength lies in its transparency and direct access to the parsed data. While it lacks the advanced UI/UX features of commercial platforms, experienced users will appreciate the directness and the ability to customize or integrate it further due to its open-source nature. It is built for utility rather than extensive polish.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal, as a commercial service, offers structured support channels. We observed that their support typically includes email-based assistance, and depending on the plan, may extend to prioritized support or dedicated account management. Documentation and FAQs are also part of their support ecosystem.
Users can generally expect timely responses for troubleshooting and guidance on platform usage. The level of support is tailored to ensure customers can effectively utilize the DMARC reporting and management features offered by the service, providing a safety net for less technical users.
For an open-source tool, support for Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer primarily comes from the community. Users can often find assistance through forums, GitHub issues, or other community-driven platforms where developers and users share knowledge and solutions. There is no official, dedicated support team.
This model means users need to be proactive in seeking solutions or contributing to the project themselves. While it offers flexibility for those who are self-sufficient, it can be a challenge for individuals or organizations without the in-house technical resources to troubleshoot complex issues.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal is very suitable for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) as it offers a streamlined, managed service that can be integrated into client offerings, reducing operational burden. For enterprise clients, it is suitable due to automated reporting, alerts, and potential dedicated support for managing large email infrastructures.
Small to medium businesses (SMBs) will find DMARCPal highly suitable, as it offers a user-friendly interface and a managed service. This helps SMBs achieve DMARC compliance without needing specialized in-house email security personnel.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is less suitable for MSPs for direct client offerings, mainly because of its self-hosting requirement and lack of formal support. However, MSPs with robust in-house development capabilities could adapt it. For enterprise use, it is less suitable unless the organization specifically requires self-hosting and has strong internal IT teams capable of maintaining an open-source solution.
For SMBs, this product is generally not suitable. SMBs typically lack the technical resources required for the installation, ongoing maintenance, and troubleshooting of an open-source DMARC report viewer, which necessitates comfort with server management and PHP environments.

How does DMARCPal compare with Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCPal, while user-friendly, can lead to vendor lock-in and its pricing model for advanced features might not suit all budgets. Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, being open-source, demands significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, and lacks commercial support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCPal operates on a subscription model with tiered features, while Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is a free, open-source solution that incurs self-hosting costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted
Large
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free, self-hosted

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCPal or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCPal vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped