Suped

DMARCPal vs DMARC-SRG

Choose DMARCPal for a managed SaaS solution, DMARC-SRG for a self-hosted, open-source tool.
DMARC-SRG
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and monitoring features within a managed Software as a Service (SaaS) platform. We found its primary strength lies in its automated DMARC report processing, providing aggregated views of DMARC, SPF, and DKIM authentication results.
The platform is designed to simplify DMARC implementation and ongoing management, allowing users to track email authentication trends, identify unauthorized senders, and progressively move their DMARC policy to enforcement. It also includes tools for debugging common SPF, DKIM, and DMARC-related issues, which is a significant advantage for those looking for guided assistance.
DMARC-SRG (DMARC Summary Report Generator) is an open-source PHP script designed for parsing, viewing, and summarizing incoming DMARC aggregate reports. It provides a more hands-on approach to DMARC data, allowing users to process XML reports locally on their own server infrastructure.
Its feature set is focused on the core task of report generation, offering insights into authentication results and sources. While it provides the raw data necessary for DMARC analysis, it requires technical expertise for setup, maintenance, and potentially for extending its capabilities, as it is not a managed service but a tool to be self-hosted.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal prioritizes an intuitive user experience with a clean, web-based interface. Setting up DMARC records and onboarding new domains is streamlined, making the initial configuration relatively straightforward, even for users with moderate technical skills. The dashboards provide clear visualizations of DMARC data, allowing for quick insights into email traffic and authentication status.
Navigating through reports and identifying authentication failures or potential spoofing attempts is facilitated by its user-friendly design. The platform aims to reduce the complexity often associated with DMARC, offering a more managed and less labor-intensive approach to email security monitoring.
DMARC-SRG, being a self-hosted open-source tool, demands a higher level of technical proficiency for setup and ongoing use. Installation involves setting up a PHP environment, configuring a web server, and managing a database, which can be a barrier for those without system administration experience. The user interface, while functional, is less polished and more geared towards displaying raw data rather than offering interactive, intuitive dashboards.
Processing DMARC reports typically involves command-line operations or scheduled scripts. While this provides granular control, it results in a less 'plug-and-play' experience compared to a SaaS solution. Users must be comfortable with manual configurations and direct server management to leverage DMARC-SRG effectively.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial SaaS product, DMARCPal offers structured customer support channels. We expect users to have access to dedicated support teams, typically through email, in-app chat, or a ticketing system. This type of support is invaluable when encountering complex DMARC issues or needing assistance with platform features.
Documentation, tutorials, and potentially a knowledge base are usually part of the offering, guiding users through various aspects of DMARC implementation and platform usage. The availability of direct, responsive support is a key differentiator for managed services like DMARCPal, reducing the burden on internal IT teams.
DMARC-SRG, as an open-source project, primarily relies on community support. Users can seek help through GitHub issues, forums, or by consulting the project's documentation. While the open-source community can be very helpful, it typically does not offer the guaranteed response times or dedicated assistance found with commercial products.
Troubleshooting often involves self-research and debugging, which requires significant technical expertise. There is no official customer service team, meaning users must be self-reliant or have in-house resources capable of managing and resolving issues that arise during deployment and operation.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal is well-suited for a broad range of organizations, particularly small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and enterprises that prefer a managed solution. Its user-friendly interface and comprehensive feature set make it ideal for teams without deep DMARC expertise but who need robust email authentication monitoring.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) would also find DMARCPal beneficial for managing multiple client domains efficiently. Its scalability and ease of use allow MSPs to onboard and monitor DMARC for their clients without significant overhead, providing valuable security services. Organizations prioritizing a lower administrative burden and guided DMARC progression will find DMARCPal a strong fit.
DMARC-SRG is best for highly technical individuals, developers, or organizations with specific requirements for data residency and self-hosting. It caters to users who have the technical skills to set up and maintain a PHP application and are comfortable working with server environments and command-line tools.
It is an excellent choice for those on a tight budget who prioritize control over their data and infrastructure. However, it is generally less suitable for SMBs or enterprises looking for a low-maintenance solution, and MSPs would find it challenging to scale across multiple clients due to its self-hosted, manual nature.

How does DMARCPal compare with DMARC-SRG?

Logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When assessing DMARCPal, potential drawbacks might include its reliance on a SaaS model, meaning less control over data residency for highly regulated industries. For DMARC-SRG, the main watch-outs are its significant technical overhead for setup and maintenance, and the lack of commercial support, which could be challenging for teams without dedicated developer resources.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC-SRG

Pricing

DMARCPal uses a tiered pricing model that requires direct contact for specific costs, whereas DMARC-SRG is open-source and therefore free to self-host, albeit with associated operational costs.
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCPal or DMARC-SRG?
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions