We found DMARCPal offers a straightforward approach to DMARC reporting, providing essential visibility into email streams. Its core strength lies in aggregating DMARC, SPF, and DKIM data, presenting it in an accessible format for initial analysis and policy adjustments.
The platform focuses on the fundamentals, making it a good starting point for domains new to DMARC enforcement. We particularly appreciate its emphasis on basic DMARC reporting tools, which are sufficient for many users.
Agari Brand Protection, on the other hand, provides a much broader suite of features tailored for large organizations facing sophisticated threats. Beyond standard DMARC reporting, we observed advanced threat intelligence capabilities, including real-time spoof detection and brand impersonation protection.
It integrates DMARC enforcement with a comprehensive security posture, aiming to prevent a wide array of email-based attacks that could impact brand reputation and customer trust.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
We found DMARCPal's interface to be quite intuitive, especially for those who appreciate a no-frills, direct approach. The dashboards are clean and present critical DMARC data without overwhelming the user with excessive detail.
We noticed that navigating between reports and settings is straightforward, allowing for quick insights and policy changes. The tool seems designed for users who want to get to the point without much learning curve.
Agari Brand Protection, given its extensive feature set, presents a more complex interface. While powerful, we found it requires a steeper learning curve to fully utilize its advanced capabilities.
The dashboards are rich with data and customizable, but they can initially feel a bit dense. For security professionals accustomed to comprehensive threat intelligence platforms, this might feel natural, but for a DMARC novice, it could be a bit much to unpack.
Which product has the best support
Support
From our experience, DMARCPal offers support that aligns with its user-friendly approach. We found documentation to be clear and helpful for common DMARC issues.
For more specific queries, the support channels, while not extensively detailed on their public site, were responsive to our basic needs, guiding us through platform features and initial setup. This level of support is generally adequate for its target audience.
Agari, as an enterprise-grade solution, provides a robust support structure, which we experienced to be highly professional and in-depth. Their team is equipped to handle complex DMARC deployments and integrated security challenges.
We observed that support interactions often involve dedicated account managers or specialized DMARC consultants, reflecting the intricate nature of the solutions they provide to their enterprise clients.
Who should use each product
Suitability
DMARCPal appears most suitable for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and individual domains looking for a cost-effective and easy-to-manage DMARC solution. It is a good fit for SMBs prioritizing straightforward DMARC implementation.
For MSPs, it could serve clients who need basic DMARC enforcement without advanced customization or deep integration. It's less ideal for large enterprises requiring extensive threat intelligence or highly complex, multi-domain DMARC architectures.
Agari Brand Protection is clearly designed for enterprise-level organizations and MSPs managing multiple large clients with significant brand exposure. Its comprehensive security features, advanced reporting, and robust support make it an excellent fit for complex environments.
For enterprise clients, it’s ideal for those prioritizing brand protection against sophisticated email attacks. SMBs would likely find it overkill, both in terms of features and cost.
How does DMARCPal compare with Agari Brand Protection?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregating and interpreting DMARC data from various sources.
Source detection
Identifying legitimate and fraudulent email sending sources.
Forward detection
Ability to track and analyze email forwarding chains.
Spoof detection
Detecting and identifying direct domain spoofing attacks.
Notifications and alerts
Receiving automated alerts for policy changes or suspicious activity.
Reporting
Customizable dashboards and exportable reports.
API
Programmatic access to data and functionalities.
Limited or no public API
Multi-tenancy
Managing multiple client domains from a single interface.
SPF flattening
Consolidating multiple SPF records into a single record.
Hosted DMARC
Ability to host DMARC records externally.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring email blocklists (or blacklists) and sender reputation.
AI copilot
AI-driven assistance for DMARC policy management and insights.
DNS monitoring
Monitoring DNS records for changes or issues.
Basic record monitoring
Self hostable
Option to host the software on private infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
14-day free trial
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
DMARCPal's main drawbacks lie in its limited advanced features, particularly concerning threat intelligence, SPF flattening, and integrations, which might not scale for larger organizations. Agari Brand Protection, while powerful, can be complex to navigate for new users and its enterprise focus means it may be cost-prohibitive for smaller entities, and we noted slow support from one review.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
4 / 5(1)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Descent Email Security
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection? I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic. What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection? The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further. What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you? It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
DMARCPal offers a free trial and tiered plans with unspecified pricing, while Agari Brand Protection requires direct contact for all pricing inquiries.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing (Lite)
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing (Standard)
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing (Premium)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with DMARCPal or Agari Brand Protection?
0 / 5(0)
