Suped

DMARCLytics vs Parseddmarc

Choose DMARCLytics for a managed service, or Parseddmarc for a self-hosted open-source solution.
Parseddmarc
Compare to Suped
Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCLytics positions itself as a comprehensive DMARC reporting and monitoring platform. We found its feature set to be robust, offering aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) report analysis, alongside tools for SPF and DKIM validation. The platform aims to provide a clear overview of email authentication statuses, identifying legitimate senders and potential threats.
Beyond basic reporting, DMARCLytics includes features like automated alerts, threat maps, DMARC aggregate geomaps, and a service tracker on higher plans. It also offers hosted DMARC and SPF flattening, which are crucial for maintaining deliverability and compliance. Inbox placement tests are another valuable addition for proactive email management.
Parseddmarc is an open-source Python package designed specifically for parsing DMARC reports. Its core strength lies in its ability to process various report types, including RUA, RUF, and SMTP TLS Reporting, making the raw data accessible. As a command-line utility, it provides the fundamental building blocks for DMARC analysis.
While Parseddmarc itself is a parser, its true power comes from integration. It can output results in JSON or CSV formats, which users can then feed into other systems like Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Splunk, or Apache Kafka for visualization and advanced analysis. This modular approach means its "features" are often components of a larger, user-built system.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, DMARCLytics offers a user-friendly web interface. The dashboard provides clear visualizations of DMARC data, making it relatively easy to understand email authentication trends and identify issues. Setting up domains and interpreting initial reports is straightforward for those familiar with DMARC concepts.
The guided setup process and intuitive navigation help users get started quickly. While the sheer volume of data can be daunting for novices, the platform's presentation simplifies much of the complexity, making DMARCLytics accessible even to those with moderate technical expertise.
Parseddmarc's user experience is inherently different due to its nature as a command-line tool. Installation and initial configuration require comfort with Python, pip, and running scripts from a terminal. This is not a point-and-click solution, demanding a more hands-on, technical approach.
Once set up, however, its operation is consistent with CLI tools. The main challenge for many users will be integrating Parseddmarc's output with a visualization tool (e.g., Kibana for Elasticsearch) to achieve a similar level of reporting as a commercial platform. This requires additional technical skill and effort.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCLytics provides standard commercial support, which typically includes email support across all plans. For higher-tier customers, dedicated DMARC engineering support is offered, which is a significant advantage for complex implementations or troubleshooting.
We expect a structured support system with response time SLAs, typical of a SaaS product. This means users can rely on direct assistance from the vendor, which can be invaluable when dealing with critical email deliverability issues or platform-specific queries.
As an open-source project, Parseddmarc relies on community support. Users will primarily find assistance through its GitHub repository, documentation, or relevant technical forums. There is no official vendor support team or dedicated help desk.
This model means that while the software itself is free, resolving issues or seeking advanced guidance depends on one's own technical prowess or the willingness of the community to assist. It's a "you build it, you own it" approach, which suits developers and those comfortable with self-reliance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
Parseddmarc
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCLytics is well-suited for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and enterprises seeking a managed, commercial DMARC reporting solution. Its various pricing tiers cater to different email volumes and domain counts, providing a scalable option without the need for internal development or extensive infrastructure management.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), DMARCLytics could serve as a white-label or integrated solution, though its multi-tenancy capabilities would need to be thoroughly evaluated. The comprehensive features and direct support make it an appealing choice for organizations prioritising ease of use and dedicated assistance over self-hosting.
Parseddmarc is ideal for technical users, developers, and organizations with the internal resources to self-host and manage their DMARC reporting infrastructure. This includes larger enterprises with specific data sovereignty requirements or those already running robust observability stacks like Elasticsearch or Splunk.
It is less suitable for SMBs or non-technical users who require an out-of-the-box solution with minimal setup and ongoing management. MSPs might find it useful as a component within their custom offerings, but it demands significant integration effort, making it a powerful but technically intensive option.

How does DMARCLytics compare with Parseddmarc?

Logo
Parseddmarc
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCLytics, while comprehensive, might present a steeper learning curve for absolute beginners due to its extensive feature set, and its pricing can scale up for very large organizations. Parseddmarc, on the other hand, requires significant technical expertise for setup, configuration, and integration with visualization tools, making it unsuitable for non-technical teams. Its reliance on community support also means direct, immediate assistance might not always be available.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Parseddmarc

Pricing

DMARCLytics operates on a tiered subscription model with a free trial, while Parseddmarc is an open-source, self-hosted solution with no direct software cost.
Logo
Parseddmarc
Small
£9.99/month (150k limit)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
£9.99/month (150k limit)
Free (self-hosted)
Large
£30/month (3M limit)
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCLytics or Parseddmarc?
Logo
Parseddmarc
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCLytics vs Parseddmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped