Suped

DMARCLytics vs Docker DMARC Reports

Choose DMARCLytics for a managed solution, and Docker DMARC Reports for full self-hosting control.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCLytics provides a robust, managed DMARC reporting and analysis platform. We found its core strength lies in its ability to parse aggregate reports, enrich data, and display it in an easily digestible format. It includes automated and configurable alerts, basic reports, a threat map, and DMARC aggregate geomaps.
For growing businesses, the Business plan adds a service tracker and inbox placement tests. The Enterprise plan further extends this with unlimited SPF, hosted DMARC, and a dedicated DMARC engineer, making it a comprehensive solution for managing complex email ecosystems.
Docker DMARC Reports is an open-source solution designed for self-hosting. It leverages existing open-source tools like dmarcts-report-parser and dmarcts-report-viewer to collect, parse, and visualize DMARC aggregate reports. Its feature set is fundamentally about providing the raw data and a basic web interface for viewing, offering full control over your data.
The project focuses on core DMARC report parsing and presentation. It doesn't inherently include advanced features like forward detection, extensive threat intelligence, or active monitoring beyond receiving RUA reports. Users are responsible for integrating any additional tools for enhanced functionality or alerting.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with DMARCLytics found the user interface to be intuitive and straightforward. The onboarding process is guided, making it relatively easy to set up your DMARC records and start receiving reports. The dashboards are well-designed, presenting key DMARC metrics, authentication failures, and email sources clearly.
The platform aims to abstract away much of the underlying complexity of DMARC, providing an accessible experience for users who may not be deep email security experts. We appreciate the configurable alerts, which allow us to customize notifications based on our specific needs without wading through logs.
Docker DMARC Reports offers a vastly different user experience, primarily because it's a self-hosted open-source project. Setting it up requires a good understanding of Docker, IMAP, and MySQL or PostgreSQL databases. We spent a significant amount of time configuring DNS records, database connections, and environment variables.
Once running, the web interface is functional but basic. It presents the parsed DMARC data in tables and simple graphs, providing the necessary information without much embellishment. It's a hands-on approach, giving us complete control but demanding significant technical proficiency to deploy and maintain.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCLytics provides direct email support across all its plans. For Business and Enterprise customers, we found the responsiveness to be quite good, addressing queries efficiently. The Enterprise plan even includes a dedicated DMARC engineer, which offers a higher level of personalized assistance and strategic guidance.
This structured support system means that if we encounter an issue or need help interpreting reports, we have a clear channel for expert assistance. The level of support scales with the plan, which is typical for managed services, ensuring that larger organizations receive the comprehensive help they require.
Docker DMARC Reports, being an open-source project, relies entirely on community support. If we run into issues during setup or operation, our primary recourse is to consult the GitHub repository, documentation, or relevant community forums. There's no dedicated support team or service level agreement.
While community support can be helpful, responses are not guaranteed or immediate. This means we need to be self-sufficient in troubleshooting and resolving problems, or have internal expertise to do so. This is a common characteristic of open-source tools, trading formal support for cost savings and control.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCLytics is well-suited for a broad range of users seeking a managed, user-friendly DMARC reporting solution. We recommend it for SMBs that need to quickly implement DMARC without extensive technical overhead, as its Starter and Business plans are quite accessible. The platform simplifies complex data into actionable insights.
For enterprise clients and MSPs (managed service providers), DMARCLytics offers scalability and advanced features, including multi-domain management and dedicated support, which are crucial for managing numerous clients or large email infrastructures. Its robust feature set and managed service appeal to organizations prioritizing convenience and expert assistance.
Docker DMARC Reports is best for technically proficient users and organizations that prefer a self-hosted, open-source approach to DMARC reporting. This includes DevOps teams, security researchers, or businesses with specific compliance requirements that necessitate full control over their data and infrastructure.
It's generally not suitable for typical SMBs due to the significant technical expertise required for setup and maintenance. While MSPs could technically implement it, they would need substantial internal resources to manage multiple instances for clients. Enterprise users with a strong preference for open source and internal engineering talent would find it valuable, but it requires commitment to self-management.

How does DMARCLytics compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCLytics, while offering a comprehensive managed solution, doesn't currently have public reviews, which makes it harder to gauge widespread user satisfaction. Its Starter plan has limited data history and key features like SPF flattening are reserved for the Enterprise tier. Docker DMARC Reports, on the other hand, comes with the inherent drawbacks of any self-hosted open-source project. It requires significant technical expertise, offers no formal support channel beyond community forums, and its feature set is quite basic compared to commercial offerings. Users are responsible for all infrastructure costs and maintenance.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCLytics offers a tiered subscription model starting at £9.99 per month, while Docker DMARC Reports is a free open-source project requiring users to cover their own hosting and infrastructure costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
£9.99/month (Starter up to 150k)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
£9.99/month (Starter up to 150k)
Free (self-hosted)
Large
£30/month (Business up to 3M)
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCLytics or Docker DMARC Reports?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCLytics vs Docker DMARC Reports DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped