DMARCly vs.
Parseddmarc in 2026
DMARCly
Parseddmarc
vs.
We tested DMARCly and Parseddmarc for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. DMARCly is the cleaner hosted choice for teams that want reports, DNS-adjacent controls, and paid support; Parseddmarc is the better fit for operators who want $0 software and are ready to run ingestion, storage, dashboards, and alerting themselves.
DMARCly
Hosted DMARC reporting and enforcement
Starts at
From $17.99 / month
Best fit
SMBs and lean security teams that want a hosted workflow
In one line
DMARCly gave us the fastest path to useful hosted reports, with Safe SPF, DNS timeline, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, and blacklist (blocklist) monitoring tied to paid tiers.
Parseddmarc
Open-source DMARC parser and pipeline
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Security engineers who want to self-host and tune the data path
In one line
Parseddmarc gave us control over parsing and outputs, but teams that want guided fixes and published starter pricing should also test Suped's product as a managed buying option.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
TLDR: choose hosted workflow or self-hosted control
Pick DMARCly if
Best for teams that want hosted DMARC reporting with paid DNS-adjacent controls
The three test domains were live quickly, and the DNS timeline helped verify published records.
Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp were named clearly enough for owner review.
Policy movement was easier once the spoof sample and parked-domain failures were visible together.
From $17.99 / month
Pick Parseddmarc if
Best for operators who want $0 software and full pipeline control
Ingestion worked after mailbox and backend configuration, including Microsoft Graph and Gmail API paths.
JSON and CSV output made the unknown sender easy to carry into our own dashboard.
The forwarded SPF failure was explainable, but we had to write the analysis and alert logic.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes connect source, owner, and DNS action for cases like the unknown sender.
Automated issue detection and cleaner alerts help separate spoofing, forwarding noise, and DNS drift.
MSP workflows and published starter pricing reduce handoff work when clients need recurring reports.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCly
Parseddmarc
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Turns rua and ruf data into reviewer-ready tables.
Hosted reports
Parser outputs
Hosted reports
Source detection
Names services such as Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp.
Vendor identification
Manual mapping
Automatic source names
Forward detection
Separates forwarding side effects from real authentication gaps.
Partial signal
Manual workflow
Forward-aware alerts
Spoof detection
Flags visible From abuse and rejected authentication paths.
Supported
Parsed evidence
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Routes useful changes without flooding inboxes.
Reports and alerts
Email and pipeline
Alert routing
Reporting
Exports and scheduled summaries for handoff.
Exports
JSON and CSV
Scheduled reports
API
Programmatic access for reporting or automation.
Enterprise tier
No product API
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Separates clients and domain groups for owners.
Domain groups
Index prefixes
Client workspaces
SPF flattening
Shortens SPF records through managed include records.
Safe SPF paid tier
No
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosts the DMARC TXT record for delegated updates.
No
No
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosts managed SPF records or flattening targets.
Safe SPF paid tier
No
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosts MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
TLS reports only
Hosted policy
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors blocklist (blacklist) and sender reputation signals.
Business tier
No
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Finds likely authentication issues without manual filters.
Basic rules
Manual filters
Supported
AI copilot
Provides natural-language help for authentication triage.
No
No
Supported
DNS monitoring
Detects DNS record changes and risky drift.
DNS timeline
No
Supported
Self hostable
Can run on your own infrastructure.
No
Yes
No
Free trial/free tier
Free product entry point or trial path.
14 day trial
$0 software
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric after the same 90 day setup, sender mix, authentication cases, report reviews, alert checks, exports, and support handoff checks. Higher is better in every row.
DMARCly scored higher for packaged enforcement; Parseddmarc held its own for self-hosted parsing
DMARCly scored higher in enforcement, onboarding, hosted SPF/MTA-STS, blacklist (blocklist) coverage, and pricing clarity because those functions were available in the hosted product. Parseddmarc scored well where raw parsing, export flexibility, operator control, and destination choice mattered, but it lost points when a workflow depended on packaged guidance, support handoff, or hosted DNS controls. For the spoof sample and forwarded SPF failure, both exposed evidence; DMARCly needed fewer steps to turn that evidence into a decision.
DMARCly score
73.5/100
Parseddmarc score
41/100
DMARCly
73.5/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
8.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
7.5
Parseddmarc
41/100
DMARC enforcement
5.0
Customer support
3.0
Source resolution
4.5
Setup and onboarding
5.0
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
4.5
Feature set
Packaged controls vs build control
DMARCly has more packaged controls. Parseddmarc has more operator control.
DMARCly had the broader packaged feature set: alerts, Safe SPF, DNS timeline, MTA-STS/TLS reporting, and blacklist (blocklist) monitoring on higher tiers. Parseddmarc gave us stronger raw-output freedom, but the team has to build owner mapping and next steps around it. If guided fixes and automated issue detection matter, include Suped's product in the buying test rather than treating raw parsing as enough.
DMARCly
Microsoft 365 named quickly
SendGrid and Mailchimp grouped
Mismatch case stayed visible
Parseddmarc
Google Workspace parsed cleanly
Unknown sender stayed manual
Forwarded SPF needed context
DMARCly covered the hosted reporting path well in our primary corporate domain and marketing subdomain. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were named quickly, SendGrid and Mailchimp were grouped under recognizable senders, and the support desk sender was easy to verify once DKIM passed. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was surfaced in drilldowns, and the unknown sender still needed human classification rather than a complete owner recommendation.
Parseddmarc gave us the raw records instead of the finished workflow. It pulled reports through IMAP, Microsoft Graph, and Gmail API in our test, then wrote JSON and CSV that captured Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, the subdomain DKIM pass, and the forwarded SPF failure. The unknown sender stayed a classification task in our own dashboard, but the output was clean enough for teams that want to build their own routing.
User experience
Guided UI vs configured pipeline
DMARCly is easier to operate. Parseddmarc is easier to customize.
DMARCly put the main reviewer path in the UI, so the team moved across domain setup, source review, and policy checks with fewer context switches. Parseddmarc felt efficient only after the mailbox, backend, and dashboard decisions were already made.
DMARCly
Three domains added in sequence
Unknown sender surfaced by volume
Forwarded SPF explanation took clicks
Parseddmarc
Config files did onboarding
Unknown sender required queries
Forwarding needed analyst notes
DMARCly handled the three-domain onboarding in a clear sequence: add the primary corporate domain, add the marketing subdomain, then add the parked domain and confirm DNS. The unknown sender was visible in the source views by volume and failure pattern, although final classification still needed a human owner. The forwarded SPF failure took more clicks to explain because we had to compare the failing SPF result with the passing DKIM result before writing the note.
Parseddmarc started as a configuration job, not a product tour. We had to choose mailbox access, set credentials, choose an output backend, and decide how the three domains would be separated before the first useful review. Once data landed, the unknown sender was findable through queries, but the forwarded SPF failure needed an analyst note because the tool exposed fields rather than a narrative.
Support
Paid help vs internal ownership
DMARCly has clearer support paths. Parseddmarc depends on in-house ownership.
DMARCly publishes support differences by tier, with email support at entry and live chat on higher tiers. Parseddmarc's public path is documentation and community-maintained code, so escalation and enterprise onboarding need an internal owner.
DMARCly
Email support on entry tier
Live chat starts higher
Enterprise onboarding clearer
Parseddmarc
Docs carry setup burden
No fixed support tier
Escalation stays internal
During setup, DMARCly's DNS handoff felt like a normal hosted-product onboarding task: publish the rua record, check the domain, then review the DNS timeline. The practical support gap is tiering; email support is enough for small setups, but live chat, SSO, access control, and API access sit higher in the plan table. For enterprise onboarding, the path was clearer than Parseddmarc because ownership, access, and escalation have product terms.
Parseddmarc support depends on how comfortable the team is with documentation, configuration files, and maintaining the runtime. DNS handoff became our own runbook, escalation meant assigning an internal engineer, and enterprise onboarding required decisions about hosting, retention, backups, monitoring, and upgrade cadence. That is workable for mature operators, but it is not a packaged support motion.
Suitability
SMB fit vs operator fit
DMARCly fits hosted SMB use better. Parseddmarc fits teams that want to own the stack.
DMARCly is easier for SMB teams that want hosted reporting and packaged DNS-adjacent controls. Parseddmarc fits teams with infrastructure skills and a clear reason to own parser, storage, dashboard, and alert plumbing. MSP buyers should test account separation, recurring reports, alert routing, and client handoff; Suped's product treats those as core workflows.
DMARCly
SMB portfolios fit paid tiers
Domain groups help handoff
Top tier unlocks controls
Parseddmarc
Operators control every layer
Client separation needs indexing
Reports need assembly
DMARCly worked best when the buyer had a finite domain set and wanted a hosted path through source review, policy movement, and recurring reports. Domain groups helped separate the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, and they would also help an MSP keep small clients apart. Enterprise buyers get clearer controls on the top tier, but client handoff notes and recurring MSP reporting still need process around the product.
Parseddmarc worked best for a team that already owns mail operations and data infrastructure. Multi-tenant index prefixes helped us separate domain groups, but they did not create client workspaces, approval notes, or recurring executive reports by themselves. For MSPs, SMBs, and enterprise programs, the fit depends on whether the buyer wants a self-hosted parser or a finished operational workflow.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCly
Hosted reporting for teams that want a shorter path to enforcement
DMARCly felt most useful after the first week, once all three domains had enough aggregate reports to compare normal senders with edge cases. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were easy to confirm, while SendGrid and Mailchimp needed owner review on the marketing subdomain before policy movement made sense.
By day 90, the product was strongest as a hosted reviewer workflow. The parked domain spoof sample stood out clearly, Safe SPF and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT belonged in the same buying conversation, and blacklist (blocklist) monitoring became relevant only when the Business tier entered the plan discussion.
Where it wins
Fast hosted setup for three domains
Clear public pricing tiers
Useful DNS timeline during handoff
Paid controls for SPF and reputation
Where it lags
Unknown sender still needed classification
Forwarded SPF explanation took manual review
API access sits on Enterprise
Some controls start on higher tiers
Pricing
From $17.99 / month
Free tier
14 day trial
Onboarding
Hosted DNS setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Parseddmarc
Self-hosted parsing for teams that want full data ownership
Parseddmarc felt powerful once the pipeline was running, but the setup work came first. We had to choose mailbox ingestion, storage, index separation, dashboard shape, and retention before the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain produced reviewer-friendly output.
By day 90, Parseddmarc was best when we treated it as parsing infrastructure. The forwarded SPF failure, subdomain DKIM pass, and unknown sender all appeared in the data, but every owner note, alert threshold, and executive report had to be built outside the parser.
Where it wins
$0 software subscription cost
Flexible JSON and CSV outputs
Self-hosted data control
Many ingestion and destination options
Where it lags
No hosted enforcement workflow
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
No blacklist or blocklist monitoring
Support depends on internal skill
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Open source
Onboarding
Self-hosted setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
DMARCly
Parseddmarc
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$17.99 / month
Professional covers up to 2 domains and 100,000 compliant messages, so the small case fits.
$0
Software cost only; one domain still needs mailbox ingestion, hosting, storage, and maintenance.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$39.99 / month
Growth covers up to 8 domains and 250,000 compliant messages, so this segment fits.
$0
Software cost only; the team still funds infrastructure, backups, monitoring, and upgrades.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$69 / month
Business covers up to 15 domains and 1 million compliant messages, with blacklist and blocklist monitoring.
$0
Software cost only; infrastructure sizing becomes the main cost at this volume.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
$199 / month
Enterprise covers up to 200 domains and 5 million messages, with published overage rules.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No official hosted enterprise plan or fixed support tier was found; self-hosted software remains $0.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
DMARCly amounts are public monthly list prices. Parseddmarc $0 means software subscription cost only; hosting, storage, backups, monitoring, and staff time are excluded. Enterprise support for Parseddmarc is not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Owner-ready fixes
In DMARCly, the unknown sender still needed manual owner tagging; in Parseddmarc, the same case required custom dashboard work. Suped's product groups sending sources and attaches guided fix steps so the corporate domain owner gets a clear handoff.
Managed ingestion
Parseddmarc gave us raw parsing, but alert rules, storage, retention, and operational routing had to be built around it. Suped's product handles managed ingestion and issue detection without a parser maintenance queue.
Client handoff
DMARCly domain groups helped, but recurring MSP notes and per-client alert routing still needed process around the tool. Suped's product gives MSPs account separation, recurring reports, and client-ready issue summaries.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCly or Parseddmarc?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
