Suped

DMARCly vs Docker DMARC Reports

Choose DMARCly for a feature-rich, managed solution, or Docker DMARC Reports for full control and self-hosting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly provides a comprehensive, cloud-based DMARC reporting and monitoring platform. Its core functionality includes automated DMARC report processing, detailed aggregate data visualization, and advanced forensic reporting. We found the platform excels at identifying legitimate email sources and flagging potential spoofing attempts.
Beyond basic DMARC, DMARCly offers additional security features like BIMI support, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT monitoring, and a 'Safe SPF' feature for SPF flattening. Its automated subdomain detection and vendor identification capabilities streamline the DMARC implementation process significantly.
Docker DMARC Reports, an open-source project, focuses on the essential task of parsing and viewing DMARC aggregate reports. It leverages `dmarcts-report-parser` and `dmarcts-report-viewer` to extract and present raw DMARC data. The feature set is intentionally lean, providing a foundational tool for DMARC visibility.
This solution gives users direct access to their DMARC data, displaying XML reports in a more digestible format. It's important to note that it doesn't offer advanced analytical tools, forensic reporting, or auxiliary email security protocols like BIMI or MTA-STS out-of-the-box. The emphasis is on simplicity and self-sufficiency.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly is designed for ease of use, even for those new to DMARC. The web interface is intuitive, with clear dashboards and detailed graphs that make understanding DMARC data straightforward. Setting up a new domain involves a guided process, and the platform automates much of the configuration once reports start flowing in.
We found the user experience to be polished and accessible, requiring minimal technical expertise to get started and manage DMARC policies. The learning curve is relatively shallow, allowing users to quickly gain insights into their email ecosystem.
The user experience with Docker DMARC Reports is decidedly different due to its self-hosted nature. Setup requires familiarity with Docker, IMAP mailboxes, and database configurations (MySQL or PostgreSQL). The reports are presented via a basic web interface that prioritizes function over form.
While the data is there, it's less visually engaging or immediately insightful than a commercial platform. It's a tool for those who prefer to interact with raw data and have the technical acumen to manage their own infrastructure. The 'user' here is often a system administrator or developer.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly offers various levels of customer support depending on the chosen plan. Paid plans typically include access to live chat and email support. We found their support team to be responsive and knowledgeable, capable of assisting with both platform-specific queries and general DMARC guidance.
The platform also provides documentation and resources to help users understand DMARC and troubleshoot common issues. This structured support system is a key advantage for users who prefer guided assistance.
As an open-source project, Docker DMARC Reports relies on community support. This primarily means engaging with other users and developers on platforms like GitHub for troubleshooting and feature requests. There is no dedicated support team or official channels for immediate assistance.
Users must be comfortable seeking solutions through documentation, community forums, or by diving into the project's code. While robust, this model demands a higher degree of self-reliance and technical problem-solving skills.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly is an excellent fit for SMBs, enterprise-level organizations, and MSPs (managed service providers) seeking a turnkey DMARC solution. Its tiered pricing and comprehensive feature set scale well, making it suitable for companies needing robust DMARC enforcement without significant in-house technical overhead. MSPs will appreciate features like domain groups and user access control for managing multiple clients.
It's ideal for those who value an intuitive user interface, automated processes, and professional support to manage their email security and deliverability effectively. If you're looking for a 'set it and forget it' approach, DMARCly is a strong contender.
Docker DMARC Reports is best suited for highly technical users, developers, and organizations with strong DevOps capabilities who prefer open-source solutions and complete control over their infrastructure. It's a cost-effective choice for small projects or individuals with the expertise to self-host and maintain the system.
This solution is less suitable for typical SMBs, enterprise clients, or MSPs that require a managed service, dedicated support, and advanced analytical features out-of-the-box. It thrives in environments where customization, transparency, and minimal recurring costs are priorities, even if it means sacrificing user-friendliness and advanced features.

How does DMARCly compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCly's main drawback is its escalating cost for higher email volumes or numerous domains, which can become significant if quotas are exceeded. Docker DMARC Reports, while free, presents a high technical barrier for initial setup and ongoing maintenance, and lacks the advanced features and professional support found in commercial offerings.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCly offers structured, subscription-based pricing that scales with usage, while Docker DMARC Reports is a free, open-source solution requiring self-hosting and associated infrastructure costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
$17.99/month (Professional, up to 100k messages)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
$17.99/month (Professional, up to 100k messages)
Free (self-hosted)
Large
$69/month (Business, up to 1M messages)
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
$199/month (Enterprise, up to 5M messages + $8/M over)
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCly or Docker DMARC Reports?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCly vs Docker DMARC Reports DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped