Suped

DMARCEye vs Fraudmarc

Choose DMARCEye for ease of use, Fraudmarc for advanced compliance features.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye focuses on providing a straightforward DMARC monitoring experience. We find that it excels in making DMARC reports digestible, even for those less familiar with the intricacies of email authentication. Its AI-powered DMARC report analysis helps in identifying potential issues quickly.
The platform covers essential DMARC reporting, including visibility into legitimate and illegitimate sending sources. While it covers core DMARC needs, advanced features like SPF flattening or MTA-STS are not primary offerings, indicating a focus on core DMARC implementation and monitoring.
Fraudmarc generally offers a more comprehensive suite of features, often catering to organizations with stringent compliance and security requirements. Their platform typically includes advanced DNS management capabilities, such as SPF flattening, which is crucial for domains with many sending services.
We've observed that Fraudmarc also extends beyond basic DMARC monitoring to include support for BIMI and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, critical for enhancing brand visibility and email transport security. This positions it as a robust solution for those seeking a full-spectrum email authentication and security platform.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our hands-on experience, DMARCEye's user interface is notably intuitive, designed to simplify complex DMARC data. The dashboards are clean, and the insights are presented in an easy-to-understand format, making it accessible even for users who are not deep email security experts.
The guided setup and clear recommendations help users quickly move their DMARC policy to enforcement. While DMARC errors themselves can be complex, as noted in some user feedback, DMARCEye strives to demystify the reporting process, which we appreciate.
Fraudmarc's platform, while powerful, can present a steeper learning curve, especially for those new to advanced email authentication. Its comprehensive feature set often means a more detailed interface, which can be overwhelming initially but offers granular control for experienced users.
We've found that navigating its various tools for SPF, BIMI, and MTA-STS requires a solid understanding of email protocols. However, for organizations with dedicated security teams or IT professionals, this level of detail provides significant advantages in managing complex environments.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye offers tiered support, starting with community support for basic plans and escalating to priority support for Scale and Enterprise users. We've seen that the community resources can be quite helpful for common issues, providing a good baseline of assistance.
For larger organizations on the Enterprise plan, DMARCEye provides 24/7 phone support, an SLA guarantee, and a dedicated account manager. This structure ensures that critical issues receive prompt attention, aligning with the needs of more complex deployments.
Fraudmarc is known for offering robust support, often including expert guidance on complex DMARC, SPF, and DKIM issues. Given their focus on advanced security, we anticipate their support team is well-versed in intricate email authentication scenarios and compliance requirements.
While specific details on their support tiers are not publicly available, our experience with similar advanced platforms suggests that they provide dedicated assistance for enterprise clients and managed service providers, ensuring a high level of technical expertise.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye is an excellent choice for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that prioritize ease of use and rapid DMARC implementation. Its Basic plan is well-suited for single-domain monitoring, while the Scale plan accommodates up to 50 domains, making it a strong contender for growing businesses.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) managing clients with less complex email environments will find DMARCEye's multi-account features and straightforward reporting beneficial. For enterprise clients needing comprehensive support, their Enterprise tier offers the necessary advanced services and guarantees.
Fraudmarc appears to be ideally suited for larger enterprises and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) that handle numerous domains and require advanced email security features beyond basic DMARC reporting. Organizations with strict compliance needs or those looking to implement BIMI, MTA-STS, and SPF flattening will find its comprehensive toolkit valuable.
While potentially more complex for SMBs, its deep feature set allows enterprise clients to achieve a high level of control and customization over their email authentication policies, offering robust protection against email fraud and improving deliverability across diverse and complex sending infrastructures.

How does DMARCEye compare with Fraudmarc?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When evaluating DMARCEye, a key observation is its strong focus on user-friendliness, which may come with fewer advanced features compared to more comprehensive platforms. While it simplifies DMARC management effectively, organizations requiring SPF flattening, BIMI, or MTA-STS will find these features are not explicitly offered. For Fraudmarc, the main drawback we identified is the lack of public pricing information, which makes initial budget planning challenging. The platform's advanced nature might also lead to a steeper learning curve for users without a strong technical background in email authentication. They also do not appear to offer any AI features or free trials.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
A seamless DMARC monitoring experience
What do you like best about DmarcEye? Ease of Use: DMARCeye is engineered with the end-user in mind, making it an ideal choice for those who are not necessarily tech-savvy. What do you dislike about DmarcEye? Sometimes it might be hard to understand DMARC errors, but I guess this is more of a DMARC problem itself. What problems is DMARCeye solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARCeye makes it easy to monitor and understand DMARC reports.
Jan P.
Programmer Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

DMARCEye offers transparent, tiered pricing with a clear discount for annual billing, whereas Fraudmarc's pricing requires direct contact, indicating a more customized, potentially enterprise-focused approach.
Logo
Logo
Small
$5.00/month (Basic, 1 domain)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$4.00/domain/month (Scale, 2-50 domains)
Contact for pricing
Large
$4.00/domain/month (Scale, 2-50 domains)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
From $300/month
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCEye or Fraudmarc?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions