Suped

DMARC360 vs Docker DMARC Reports

Choose DMARC360 for a comprehensive, managed DMARC platform, or Docker DMARC Reports for a self-hosted, open-source solution.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360 offers a robust and comprehensive suite for DMARC monitoring and enforcement. We found it goes beyond basic reporting, integrating threat intelligence, brand protection, and email security features into a single platform. This holistic approach helps identify and mitigate various email-borne threats, not just DMARC compliance issues.
Its feature set is designed for organizations looking for deep insights into their email ecosystem, providing detailed DMARC reports, advanced analytics, and often automated remediation capabilities. It's built to give a complete picture of email authenticity and potential spoofing attempts, often as part of a larger security offering.
Docker DMARC Reports is an open-source solution focused specifically on parsing and visualizing DMARC reports. It's a straightforward tool that takes aggregated DMARC (RUA) reports, processes them, and presents them in a web-based interface. We found it effectively shows who is sending email on your behalf and which sources are failing DMARC authentication.
While functional for its core purpose, its feature set is inherently limited by its open-source, self-hosted nature. It provides a foundational view of DMARC compliance but lacks the advanced analytics, automated actions, or broader email security capabilities found in commercial platforms. It's a DIY approach, giving you the raw data in an accessible format, but little else.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360 generally offers a polished, professional user interface designed for ease of navigation and data visualization. We found that setting up DMARC records and configuring the platform is a guided process, often with support from their team. The dashboards are intuitive, providing clear overviews of DMARC compliance and threat landscapes.
While comprehensive, some users have noted a slight learning curve due to the sheer number of modules and advanced features, as it's often part of a larger digital risk protection platform. However, once familiar, the platform streamlines the management of complex email security policies, making it accessible for security professionals.
The user experience for Docker DMARC Reports starts with a significant technical hurdle: self-hosting. We mean, it's in the name. You need a good understanding of Docker, IMAP, and MySQL (or PostgreSQL) to get it up and running. This isn't a click-and-deploy solution for the faint of heart, or for those who prefer their coffee without a side of YAML files.
Once deployed, the web interface itself is quite straightforward. It's a clean, functional viewer for DMARC data, but it's not a feature-rich analytics platform. For those comfortable with the initial setup, the day-to-day use of viewing reports is simple, but any customization or deeper analysis requires diving back into the command line or database.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360 stands out with its dedicated and responsive customer support, a consistent theme in user reviews. We've seen their team praised for being professional, knowledgeable, and quick to address issues, whether it's initial setup or ongoing threat mitigation. This level of personalized assistance is invaluable for complex email security challenges.
Their support extends beyond just technical help, often guiding users through DMARC policy changes and offering strategic advice on improving email deliverability and security posture. This managed service aspect makes them a partner in your email security journey, rather than just a software provider.
Docker DMARC Reports, being an open-source project, offers community-based support. This typically means relying on GitHub issues, forums, or self-service documentation. While the community can be helpful, there's no official support team to turn to for urgent issues or personalized guidance.
We find that for those comfortable troubleshooting, reading code, and contributing to discussions, this model works. However, for organizations seeking guaranteed response times, formal service level agreements (SLAs), or guided assistance with DMARC policies, this solution will fall short. You're largely on your own, which can be both a blessing and a curse.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360 is highly suitable for enterprise organizations and managed service providers (MSPs) that require a comprehensive, hands-off approach to email security and DMARC enforcement. Its extensive feature set, dedicated support, and often multi-tenancy capabilities make it a strong choice for managing multiple domains or large, complex email infrastructures.
For small to medium businesses (SMBs), the Community Edition can be a good starting point, with scalability to paid plans as needs grow. It is ideal for those who prioritize robust protection, detailed analytics, and professional support over DIY solutions, and who may not have dedicated internal resources for deep technical management.
Docker DMARC Reports is best suited for technically proficient individuals, small development teams, or SMBs with strong internal IT or DevOps capabilities. It caters to those who prefer complete control over their data, enjoy tinkering with open-source solutions, and have the resources to self-host and maintain the application.
It is generally less suitable for enterprises or MSPs without a significant commitment to self-managed infrastructure for DMARC, due to its lack of multi-tenancy, dedicated support, and advanced features. If your organization values cost savings and technical autonomy above a fully managed, feature-rich platform, this could be your playground.

How does DMARC360 compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC360, while powerful, can present a learning curve due to its extensive feature set and some users have noted occasional issues with filtering and integration. Docker DMARC Reports, on the other hand, demands significant technical expertise for setup and maintenance, and its feature set is basic, lacking advanced security tools and dedicated support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
delivers a seamless, proactive brand protection experience
What do you like best about CTM360? CTM360 consolidates external attack surface management, brand protection, anti‑phishing, and takedowns into a single, unified platform. It cuts through the noise with pre‑populated threat data specific to our brand—no extra setup required—and consistently delivers highly actionable alerts What do you dislike about CTM360? While takedowns are fast and effective, expanding reach across more platforms and registrars would enhance the impact What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Data leakage, Breaches, Brand imposters or VIP
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
It's Good
What do you like best about CTM360? The detection works. Really good information given on breached credentials and fake apps that a takedown was so easy. What do you dislike about CTM360? The interface is not user friendly. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of clicks to get the information needed. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? It allows us to view breached credentials and also fake website & apps.
Zulfa J.
CTO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
CTM360 give whole experience as a user. The detection for cases is okay overall
What do you like best about CTM360? The support of the CTM360 team is totally responsive and helpful. The platform also user friendly and easy to use What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometimes we got confuse with the filtering features. However, the support team has guide us accordingly What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Detection for EASM cases - features of deep scanning brand monitoring. By connecting with the CIRT team globally. CTM360 Sometimes able to take down cases faster than other platform
Verified User in Financial Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Recommmended
What do you like best about CTM360? quick Threat intelligence and insights about the related issues and leaks What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometime shows repeated or resolved issues and vulnerabilities What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? TI feeds, Data leaks etc
Hafiz T.
Unit Head Cyber Security Operations Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Review CTM360 after using for 1 Year period.
What do you like best about CTM360? Most helpful from CTM360 is take down phishing domain very fast for my customer and could finding and detect Brand Impersonation focus on Social media app with fake content. What do you dislike about CTM360? Least helpful is data exposure on repository with another platform such as Gitlab , Bitbucket in case some customer using above tool will could not detect. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? In the past take down period is big issue for my customer because take around 5-7days and customer have complain on this issue , However when changing to use "Brand Protection" of CTM360 service , CTM360 team could help my team action quickly on take down phishing URL or fake content URL related with my customer domain name. average complete action take down around 2-3 days.
Watthanachai K.
Consulting IT Specialist Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

We see a stark contrast in pricing models, with DMARC360 offering a managed service with a free community edition, while Docker DMARC Reports is a free, self-hosted open-source project.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing (Community Edition available)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC360 or Docker DMARC Reports?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARC360 vs Docker DMARC Reports DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped