Suped

DMARC360 vs DMARCAnalyzer

Choose DMARC360 for comprehensive digital risk protection, choose DMARCAnalyzer for dedicated DMARC enforcement.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360, as part of the broader CTM360 suite, offers DMARC reporting and enforcement alongside a comprehensive digital risk protection platform. This means we get a wider array of cybersecurity tools, including external attack surface management, brand protection, anti-phishing, and takedown services, all integrated into one portal. Its DMARC capabilities are robust, providing clear insights into email authentication results and helping us achieve DMARC enforcement.
We found DMARC360’s approach to be more encompassing, catering to organizations that need not just DMARC, but a holistic view of their external cyber posture. The platform focuses on consolidating various security functions, which can simplify vendor management if we're looking for an all-in-one solution beyond just email authentication.
DMARCAnalyzer, now part of Mimecast, is a more focused DMARC reporting tool. It excels at providing detailed DMARC reports, clear visualizations, and actionable advice for achieving enforcement. We appreciate its dedicated focus on email authentication, which makes it very efficient for teams whose primary concern is DMARC implementation and monitoring.
While it doesn't offer the extensive digital risk protection features of DMARC360, DMARCAnalyzer provides essential DMARC-specific functionalities such as SPF flattening, hosted DMARC, and easy integration for BIMI, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT. It's a specialist in its field, ensuring we have all the necessary components for strong email security without unnecessary extras.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, DMARC360 presents a unified dashboard that, while powerful, can sometimes feel a bit overwhelming due to the sheer breadth of features it covers. Navigating between DMARC reports and other security modules requires a bit of a learning curve. However, once we got the hang of it, the consolidated view proved beneficial for linking DMARC issues with broader brand protection efforts.
The interface is functional, but some users might find the amount of information dense, especially if we are only interested in DMARC. The platform aims to provide a comprehensive security posture, which naturally leads to a more complex layout. We noted that consistent use helped in familiarizing ourselves with its structure and identifying the relevant DMARC functionalities quickly.
DMARCAnalyzer offers a cleaner, more intuitive user interface, largely due to its singular focus on DMARC. We found it exceptionally easy to set up and start monitoring DMARC reports. The dashboards are well-organized, making it straightforward to identify authentication failures, legitimate senders, and potential spoofing attempts.
The guided setup and clear explanations within the platform significantly reduce the learning curve. For teams looking for a direct, no-fuss approach to DMARC, DMARCAnalyzer provides an excellent user experience that prioritizes clarity and ease of use. It allows us to quickly pinpoint issues and make necessary adjustments without getting lost in a labyrinth of features.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our interactions with DMARC360's support team have generally been positive. Given its broader scope, the support staff is knowledgeable across various cybersecurity domains, not just DMARC. We found them responsive and helpful in resolving issues and providing guidance on how to leverage the platform's extensive features.
The comprehensive nature of CTM360 means that support inquiries can sometimes be complex, but the team demonstrates a strong ability to assist. They offer valuable insights, particularly when DMARC issues intersect with other aspects of digital risk, which can be a significant advantage for organizations needing integrated security advice.
DMARCAnalyzer provides excellent dedicated support for DMARC implementation and ongoing management. We've found their team to be experts in email authentication protocols, offering precise and timely assistance. For any DMARC-specific query, their support is readily available and highly effective.
Their focus allows them to deeply specialize in DMARC-related challenges, providing quick and accurate solutions. While they might not advise on broader cybersecurity issues, for anything related to email authentication, DMARCAnalyzer's support is a reliable resource that helps us maintain optimal email deliverability and security policies.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360 is best suited for Enterprise organizations and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) looking for an integrated cybersecurity platform that includes DMARC. If we already have a robust security team and budget, and we need to consolidate multiple external threat monitoring tools, DMARC360 (as part of CTM360) offers a compelling solution. Its extensive feature set caters to complex security requirements, making it ideal for those who need a unified view of their digital risk. It's less ideal for SMBs whose sole focus is DMARC.
For MSPs, the ability to manage multiple clients' digital risk postures, including DMARC, from a single platform is a significant advantage. Enterprises benefit from the comprehensive brand protection and attack surface management, which complements DMARC enforcement. It’s for organizations prioritizing a holistic, managed approach to external cybersecurity.
DMARCAnalyzer is an excellent choice for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and mid-market organizations that need a dedicated, easy-to-use DMARC reporting and enforcement solution. While it can scale to enterprise needs, its streamlined focus makes it particularly accessible for teams that might not have extensive cybersecurity resources or require a broader digital risk platform. It's suitable for MSPs primarily focused on email deliverability services.
If our primary goal is to quickly implement and maintain a strong DMARC policy without the added complexity of other cybersecurity tools, DMARCAnalyzer fits the bill perfectly. It's also a good option for enterprises seeking a specialized DMARC tool that integrates well with their existing security stack, especially if their broader digital risk needs are already covered by other solutions.
Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
Not a primary feature.
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier
When considering drawbacks, DMARC360’s broad functionality, while a strength, can also be a weakness for those seeking a simple DMARC solution. The platform's complexity and occasional UI density might be a hurdle. For DMARCAnalyzer, its primary drawback is its singular focus, meaning we might need additional tools for broader digital risk management if our needs extend beyond DMARC. Also, the rebranding to Mimecast could introduce changes in its future direction.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
delivers a seamless, proactive brand protection experience
What do you like best about CTM360? CTM360 consolidates external attack surface management, brand protection, anti‑phishing, and takedowns into a single, unified platform. It cuts through the noise with pre‑populated threat data specific to our brand—no extra setup required—and consistently delivers highly actionable alerts What do you dislike about CTM360? While takedowns are fast and effective, expanding reach across more platforms and registrars would enhance the impact What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Data leakage, Breaches, Brand imposters or VIP
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
It's Good
What do you like best about CTM360? The detection works. Really good information given on breached credentials and fake apps that a takedown was so easy. What do you dislike about CTM360? The interface is not user friendly. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of clicks to get the information needed. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? It allows us to view breached credentials and also fake website & apps.
Zulfa J.
CTO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
CTM360 give whole experience as a user. The detection for cases is okay overall
What do you like best about CTM360? The support of the CTM360 team is totally responsive and helpful. The platform also user friendly and easy to use What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometimes we got confuse with the filtering features. However, the support team has guide us accordingly What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Detection for EASM cases - features of deep scanning brand monitoring. By connecting with the CIRT team globally. CTM360 Sometimes able to take down cases faster than other platform
Verified User in Financial Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Recommmended
What do you like best about CTM360? quick Threat intelligence and insights about the related issues and leaks What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometime shows repeated or resolved issues and vulnerabilities What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? TI feeds, Data leaks etc
Hafiz T.
Unit Head Cyber Security Operations Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Review CTM360 after using for 1 Year period.
What do you like best about CTM360? Most helpful from CTM360 is take down phishing domain very fast for my customer and could finding and detect Brand Impersonation focus on Social media app with fake content. What do you dislike about CTM360? Least helpful is data exposure on repository with another platform such as Gitlab , Bitbucket in case some customer using above tool will could not detect. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? In the past take down period is big issue for my customer because take around 5-7days and customer have complain on this issue , However when changing to use "Brand Protection" of CTM360 service , CTM360 team could help my team action quickly on take down phishing URL or fake content URL related with my customer domain name. average complete action take down around 2-3 days.
Watthanachai K.
Consulting IT Specialist Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
DMARC360 offers a free Community Edition, with other pricing requiring direct contact, whereas DMARCAnalyzer provides a free trial and custom quotes.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC360 or DMARCAnalyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free