Suped

DMARC Visualizer vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARC Visualizer for quick Grafana dashboards, or ELK DMARC for deep log analysis with Kibana.
DMARC Visualizer
Compare to Suped
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Visualizer primarily leverages the power of Grafana for its interface, offering a highly customizable dashboard approach to DMARC data. It focuses on presenting aggregate and forensic reports in a visually engaging manner.
The architecture relies on feeding DMARC reports into Elasticsearch via parsedmarc and then rendering them through Grafana. This provides flexibility for users familiar with the ELK stack or Grafana, allowing for detailed query building and visualization.
ELK DMARC, as its name suggests, is a full ELK stack implementation tailored for DMARC. It uses Kibana as its primary visualization tool, offering powerful search, filtering, and dashboard capabilities on raw DMARC data.
This solution excels in allowing users to drill down into individual log entries, making it suitable for forensic analysis. It provides comprehensive parsing of DMARC reports and stores them in Elasticsearch, enabling robust data exploration for incident response.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Setting up DMARC Visualizer requires a certain level of technical proficiency, particularly with Docker, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. However, once deployed, the included Grafana dashboards provide a strong starting point for DMARC monitoring.
For users already comfortable with Grafana, tailoring the dashboards and creating new visualizations is intuitive. For newcomers, there's a learning curve to fully harness its capabilities beyond the default views, but the visual nature helps.
ELK DMARC also demands a significant technical understanding for deployment, specifically around Docker, the ELK stack, and system administration. Its user interface is Kibana, which is incredibly powerful but can be daunting.
While it offers immense flexibility for data exploration and analysis, the initial experience can feel less 'plug-and-play' compared to some commercial tools. Its strength lies in deep diving into logs, which is a specific use case not every user needs constantly.
Which product has the best support

Support

DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As an open-source project, DMARC Visualizer relies on community support through its GitHub repository. Users can open issues, contribute, or seek help from others using the tool.
There is no formal support channel or dedicated team. Problem-solving often involves searching existing issues or engaging directly with the open-source community, which can be slower than commercial support.
Similarly, ELK DMARC is an open-source initiative, meaning support is primarily derived from the GitHub community. This includes filing issues, contributing code, and engaging in discussions with other users and the maintainers.
While the project maintainer is active, there isn't a guaranteed service level agreement (SLA) or direct professional support. Users should be prepared for self-reliance and leveraging shared community knowledge.
Who should use each product

Suitability

DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Visualizer is best suited for individuals or small technical teams who have experience with Docker and Grafana. It's an excellent choice for those wanting to learn about DMARC, implement a free solution, or who enjoy customizing their monitoring dashboards.
For MSPs and enterprise organizations, while the core technology is powerful, the lack of dedicated support and the self-managed nature might pose scalability and maintenance challenges. SMBs with technical resources could leverage it effectively.
ELK DMARC shines for technical users, security analysts, and IT departments who need granular control over their DMARC data and are comfortable with the full ELK stack. Its strength in forensic analysis makes it valuable for incident response teams.
Enterprise environments with robust DevOps teams might find it suitable, but MSPs and SMBs might struggle with the operational overhead of managing the entire ELK stack. It requires significant technical expertise and infrastructure commitment.

How does DMARC Visualizer compare with ELK DMARC?

DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Both DMARC Visualizer and ELK DMARC share similar drawbacks inherent to open-source, self-hosted solutions. They demand considerable technical expertise for deployment, ongoing maintenance, and troubleshooting. The absence of commercial support means users must rely on community forums or their own skills to resolve issues. This can be a significant barrier for organizations without dedicated IT or DevOps teams, making the operational overhead higher than that of managed DMARC services.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC

Pricing

Both DMARC Visualizer and ELK DMARC are open-source solutions with no direct licensing costs, requiring users to factor in only the expenses related to hosting infrastructure and their own technical labor.
DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
Small
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Medium
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Large
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Enterprise
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Visualizer or ELK DMARC?
DMARC Visualizer
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions