Suped

DMARC-SRG vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARC-SRG for simple, self-hosted PHP, or ELK DMARC for a scalable Elasticsearch setup.
DMARC-SRG
Compare to Suped
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC-SRG provides a straightforward PHP-based solution for parsing, viewing, and summarizing DMARC aggregate reports. Its core strength lies in its simplicity, offering a clear overview of DMARC compliance data without extensive configuration. We found it effective for basic DMARC monitoring and understanding email authentication trends.
It focuses on delivering essential insights into DMARC pass/fail rates, showing the sources of your email traffic. While it handles the fundamental aspects of DMARC reporting well, advanced features like real-time alerting or deep forensic analysis are beyond its scope, reflecting its minimalist, self-hosted design.
ELK DMARC leverages the powerful Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana (ELK) stack to provide a more robust and scalable DMARC reporting solution. This setup allows for detailed data indexing and visualization, offering deeper insights into email streams and potential spoofing attempts. We appreciated its capability for complex queries and data exploration.
With ELK DMARC, we found it possible to analyze trends over time, identify specific sending sources, and configure custom dashboards to track DMARC, SPF, and DKIM authentication. Its architecture supports higher volumes of DMARC reports and offers greater flexibility for those familiar with the ELK stack, enabling more proactive monitoring and alerting based on the data.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC-SRG is designed for ease of deployment and operation, especially for those comfortable with PHP applications. The interface is functional and presents DMARC data in a tabular and graphical format, making it easy to quickly grasp the overall status of your email authentication. Its simplicity means less time spent on configuration and more on analysis.
However, its user interface is quite basic, reflecting its open-source, community-driven nature. We found it to be no-frills, focusing purely on presenting the data rather than offering an aesthetically polished or highly interactive experience. For users who prefer minimal complexity and direct data representation, this is a distinct advantage.
ELK DMARC's user experience is largely defined by Kibana, which offers powerful visualization and dashboarding capabilities. Once the ELK stack is configured, creating and customizing reports is intuitive for users familiar with Kibana. The ability to drill down into data and build complex queries provides a rich analytical experience.
The initial setup, however, can be quite challenging, particularly for those new to Docker and the ELK stack. We noticed a steeper learning curve to get it fully operational and optimized. Once past the initial hurdles, the day-to-day interaction through Kibana is highly flexible and capable, but it does require a commitment to understanding the underlying technologies.
Which product has the best support

Support

DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As an open-source project, DMARC-SRG relies on community support. We found that assistance is primarily available through its GitHub repository, where issues can be reported and discussions can take place. This model means support is informal and depends on the availability and engagement of contributors.
There isn't a dedicated support team or official channels for immediate assistance. Users should be prepared to troubleshoot issues independently or rely on the collective knowledge of the open-source community. This can be perfectly adequate for those with technical expertise but might be a challenge for others.
Similarly, ELK DMARC is an open-source, self-hosted solution, meaning official commercial support is not included. Support is typically found within the wider ELK stack community forums and its own GitHub repository. We observed that help is available from other users who have deployed similar setups.
Given the complexity of the ELK stack, troubleshooting can sometimes be more involved, and finding specific solutions for ELK DMARC can require familiarity with Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. While the community is generally helpful, it's not a substitute for enterprise-level support, which is common in commercial DMARC reporting platforms.
Who should use each product

Suitability

DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC-SRG is best suited for small to medium businesses (SMBs) or individual administrators who need a simple, self-hosted solution for DMARC reporting. Its low resource footprint and ease of deployment for PHP environments make it a good choice for those with basic DMARC monitoring needs and limited budgets.
For managed service providers (MSPs) or enterprises, DMARC-SRG's lack of advanced features, multi-tenancy, and formal support might be limiting. It works well for those who value direct control over their data and prefer a lean application, without the overhead of complex systems.
ELK DMARC is ideal for technically proficient SMBs, MSPs, or enterprises that already use or are willing to invest in learning the ELK stack. It suits organizations requiring scalable, customizable DMARC reporting with powerful analytics capabilities for large volumes of data. Its flexibility allows for tailored insights.
While its setup can be more complex, its scalability and deep analytical potential make it suitable for MSPs managing multiple clients or enterprises with extensive email infrastructures. For those who need more than basic DMARC reports and are comfortable with self-hosting and managing their own infrastructure, ELK DMARC offers significant advantages.

How does DMARC-SRG compare with ELK DMARC?

DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC-SRG, while simple, may fall short for organizations needing advanced features or scalability, requiring manual checks for alerts and deeper insights. ELK DMARC offers powerful analytics but comes with a significant setup and maintenance overhead due to the complexity of the ELK stack, potentially proving costly in terms of time and expertise.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC

Pricing

Both DMARC-SRG and ELK DMARC are open-source and self-hosted, meaning there are no direct licensing costs, though ELK DMARC incurs infrastructure expenses for its Elasticsearch components.
DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
Small
Self-hosted, open source
Self-hosted, open source, infra costs apply
Medium
Self-hosted, open source
Self-hosted, open source, infra costs apply
Large
Self-hosted, open source
Self-hosted, open source, infra costs apply
Enterprise
Self-hosted, open source
Self-hosted, open source, infra costs apply

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC-SRG or ELK DMARC?
DMARC-SRG
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions