Suped

DMARC Director vs Docker DMARC Reports

Choose DMARC Director for a managed solution, and Docker DMARC Reports for a self-hosted, technical approach.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director presents itself as a comprehensive, managed DMARC reporting solution. Our experience suggests it focuses on providing a user-friendly interface to interpret complex DMARC data, making it accessible even for those without deep technical expertise.
Key features typically include aggregated and forensic report analysis, helping users visualize email authentication results, identify sending sources, and detect potential spoofing attempts. As a commercial platform, we expect it to offer robust data retention and reporting capabilities tailored for business use cases.
Docker DMARC Reports, being a self-hosted open-source project, offers a more hands-on approach to DMARC data. It's built around parsing DMARC XML reports and storing them in a database, typically MySQL or PostgreSQL, for viewing via a web interface. The core functionality is robust DMARC report processing and visualization.
This solution provides the essential data points needed for DMARC analysis, showing authentication rates for SPF and DKIM, DMARC policy application, and identified sending sources. Its strength lies in its transparency and the ability for users to directly control the data and environment, though it lacks many of the advanced features found in managed services.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our interactions, DMARC Director aims for a streamlined user experience, typical of a SaaS (Software as a Service) platform. The setup process involves configuring DNS records to send DMARC reports to their service, after which the platform handles the parsing and presentation of data.
Its dashboard is designed to be intuitive, offering graphical representations of DMARC compliance, authentication failures, and sending sources. The focus is on simplifying complex data into actionable insights, making it suitable for users who prefer a hands-off, guided experience.
Docker DMARC Reports offers a distinctly different user experience, primarily because it's a self-hosted open-source solution. The initial setup requires significant technical expertise, involving Docker, IMAP configuration, and database management.
Once configured, the web interface for viewing reports is functional, providing clear tabular and graphical data. However, it's a no-frills interface, lacking the polish and advanced navigation features of commercial tools. It caters to users comfortable with command lines and self-management, valuing control over out-of-the-box convenience.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial entity, DMARC Director offers structured support channels. We anticipate support via phone and email, typical for business-oriented SaaS products. The quality and responsiveness of support are crucial for managed DMARC services, especially when troubleshooting deliverability issues or interpreting complex reports.
Their support infrastructure likely includes documentation, FAQs, and direct assistance for setup, configuration, and ongoing analysis. This level of dedicated support is a significant advantage for organizations that prefer professional assistance rather than relying on internal expertise or community forums.
Docker DMARC Reports, as an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. Users needing assistance will typically turn to GitHub issues, forums, or other online communities where the project is discussed. There's no official, dedicated support team to contact directly.
This model means that troubleshooting and getting help depend on the goodwill and availability of other users and the project maintainers. While a vibrant open-source community can be very helpful, it doesn't guarantee timely or personalized support, which can be a significant consideration for critical email infrastructure.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director is well-suited for organizations that prioritize ease of use and a managed service experience. We see it as an excellent fit for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and enterprises that need to implement and monitor DMARC without investing heavily in technical resources.
It's also highly suitable for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who want to offer DMARC reporting as a service to their clients, leveraging a platform that handles the underlying complexity. If you prefer a polished interface and dedicated support, DMARC Director is a strong contender.
Docker DMARC Reports targets a very different audience: technically proficient individuals, small teams with a strong DevOps culture, or organizations that require complete control over their data and infrastructure. Its self-hostable nature makes it appealing for those who want to avoid vendor lock-in and manage everything themselves.
For MSPs, this solution could work if they have the internal expertise to deploy and maintain it for their clients, but it demands a higher operational overhead than a commercial platform. It's less suitable for SMBs or enterprises lacking dedicated IT staff familiar with Docker and Linux environments, who might find the setup and maintenance daunting.

How does DMARC Director compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC Director, while offering a managed solution, lacks transparent pricing, which can be a hurdle for budgeting. Being a vendor-dependent solution, customization might also be limited compared to self-hosted alternatives. On the other hand, Docker DMARC Reports requires substantial technical proficiency for setup and ongoing maintenance, and it offers no commercial support, making it unsuitable for teams without dedicated technical resources. Its interface is also less refined, reflecting its open-source nature.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

The primary pricing difference is that DMARC Director requires contacting them for a quote, whereas Docker DMARC Reports is entirely free as a self-hosted open-source solution.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Director or Docker DMARC Reports?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions