Suped

DMARC 25 vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer

Choose DMARC 25 for a managed solution, choose Techsneeze for DIY open-source control.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features, focusing on ease of use and automated analysis. We found its primary strength lies in its ability to parse and present complex DMARC XML reports in an understandable format, making it accessible even for those new to DMARC.
The platform provides clear visibility into email authentication results, showing SPF and DKIM alignment, and helps identify legitimate versus illegitimate sending sources. While it covers the essentials, we noticed some advanced features, like detailed forensic reporting (RUF), are less prominent or require specific configurations.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is an open-source tool, meaning its feature set is community-driven and depends on your technical prowess to deploy and configure. It provides a foundational DMARC reporting solution, allowing users to aggregate and visualize DMARC RUA reports effectively.
For those comfortable with self-hosting, it offers granular control over data. However, out-of-the-box, it lacks some of the more advanced, automated insights and features that are common in commercial DMARC solutions, such as intelligent threat detection or integrated policy management, but the core reporting functionality is solid.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience with DMARC 25 is designed to be intuitive and streamlined. The dashboard is clean, presenting key DMARC metrics and trends at a glance. We appreciate the guided setup process and the clear explanations for various DMARC concepts, which helps users quickly understand their email authentication status.
Navigating through reports and filtering data is straightforward. While it excels in user-friendliness, highly technical users might find some customization options limited compared to more complex tools.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, being a self-hosted open-source solution, demands a certain level of technical expertise for initial setup and ongoing management. Its user interface is functional but leans towards a more utilitarian design, reflecting its community-driven development.
Once configured, the dashboard provides the necessary data visualizations, but the overall experience is less polished than commercial offerings. Users should be prepared for some command-line interaction and manual configuration, which could be a barrier for less technical teams.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 offers dedicated customer support, which is a significant advantage for users who prefer guided assistance. We found their support team to be responsive and knowledgeable, capable of addressing DMARC-related queries and platform-specific issues.
They provide contact options via phone and web, ensuring that users can receive help during business hours. This structured support is beneficial for organizations that require reliable assistance to maintain email security.
Support for Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer primarily comes from its open-source community. Users can leverage online forums, documentation, and potentially GitHub issues for assistance. While the community can be helpful, it lacks the guaranteed response times or personalized attention of a commercial support team.
Troubleshooting often requires self-reliance and the ability to interpret technical discussions. This model suits users who are comfortable with a do-it-yourself approach or have in-house technical resources to manage the solution.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 is highly suitable for organizations seeking a managed, user-friendly DMARC reporting solution. Its strengths lie in simplifying DMARC data, making it an excellent choice for teams with limited DMARC expertise or those who prefer a hands-off approach to monitoring.
It is particularly well-suited for:
• SMBs: Provides essential DMARC protection without requiring extensive technical overhead.
• Enterprises: Offers robust reporting capabilities that can scale, albeit with a need to coordinate with their support for specific advanced needs.
• MSPs: Can integrate into a managed service offering, but the focus is more on individual client management rather than multi-tenant account structures.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is ideal for technically proficient users and organizations who value open-source flexibility and complete control over their data. Its self-hosted nature means it requires a team with system administration and DMARC knowledge.
It is best for:
• SMBs: Only if they have strong in-house IT and budget constraints, as it requires significant self-management.
• Enterprises: For those with strict data sovereignty requirements or extensive in-house DevOps teams that can customize and maintain the solution.
• MSPs: Offers a foundation for building a DMARC service, but the MSP would need to manage all deployments and reporting for each client, as it lacks inherent multi-tenancy.

How does DMARC 25 compare with Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering the drawbacks, DMARC 25, while user-friendly, can feel a bit light on advanced features and transparent pricing. Its reporting, while good for the basics, might not satisfy deeply technical users looking for forensic detail. Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, on the other hand, is free but comes with the significant overhead of self-hosting and managing everything ourselves, which can quickly outweigh the cost savings if we lack the technical resources (and patience).
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

The fundamental difference in pricing is that DMARC 25 operates on a commercial, contact-for-pricing model after a free trial, while Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is open-source and free, but requires self-hosting.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted costs)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC 25 or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions