Suped

DMARC 25 vs Docker DMARC Reports

Choose DMARC 25 for a managed solution, or Docker DMARC Reports for self-hosting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 is a commercial platform offering a complete suite for DMARC monitoring and enforcement. We find it provides intuitive dashboards that simplify complex DMARC reports, making it accessible even for those new to email authentication. Its feature set is designed for comprehensive oversight.
DMARC 25 excels in providing a robust DMARC reporting environment. It aggregates RUA and RUF reports, presents them in an easily digestible format, and helps identify sending sources. We particularly appreciate its ability to analyze authentication failures, allowing us to pinpoint issues with SPF and DKIM configurations. This level of detail is crucial for effective policy enforcement.
Docker DMARC Reports is an open-source project designed for those who prefer to self-host their DMARC reporting. This solution requires a solid technical background to set up and maintain, as it involves deploying Docker containers and managing a database. It offers fundamental DMARC report parsing and viewing capabilities.
When using Docker DMARC Reports, we observed that it provides the core functionality needed to process DMARC aggregate reports. It can store and display data on DMARC compliance, authenticated sources, and failing emails. While functional, it lacks the advanced analytics and user-friendly interface that commercial platforms typically offer, demanding more manual effort for deeper insights.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found DMARC 25 to offer a polished and user-friendly interface. Navigating through reports, configuring domains, and setting up alerts is straightforward, even for users who are not deep into email forensics. The dashboards are visually clear and present actionable data without overwhelming complexity, which is a significant plus.
Our experience with DMARC 25 indicates a strong focus on ease of use. The setup process for new domains is guided, and the system automates much of the data aggregation and presentation. This allows us to quickly understand our DMARC compliance posture and identify potential threats or misconfigurations efficiently.
The user experience for Docker DMARC Reports is inherently different due to its self-hosted, open-source nature. Installation requires comfort with command-line interfaces, Docker, and database management. Once deployed, the web interface is functional but minimalist, providing raw data points rather than rich visualizations.
For those accustomed to managed SaaS solutions, the Docker DMARC Reports interface might feel rudimentary. It serves its purpose for viewing parsed reports, but advanced filtering, custom dashboards, or proactive alerts are not built-in. We noticed that getting specific insights often requires direct interaction with the underlying database or additional scripting.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found DMARC 25's support to be responsive and knowledgeable. Given its commercial nature, assistance with setup, configuration, and troubleshooting is expected and delivered. They offer direct contact methods, which is reassuring for businesses relying on their service for critical email security.
Our interactions with DMARC 25's support team were positive. They are equipped to handle queries ranging from initial onboarding to complex DMARC policy adjustments. This hands-on support is a key differentiator, especially when navigating the intricacies of DMARC implementation and optimization.
As an open-source project, formal support for Docker DMARC Reports is non-existent. Users rely on community forums, GitHub issues, and their own technical expertise for troubleshooting. This model works well for developers or IT teams with internal resources but can be a challenge for others.
When encountering issues with Docker DMARC Reports, we depended on reviewing the project's documentation and existing GitHub discussions. While the community can sometimes offer guidance, there's no dedicated team to provide immediate or personalized assistance. This means a higher degree of self-sufficiency is required to maintain the system.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
This solution is well-suited for a broad range of organizations seeking a managed DMARC reporting service.
Its user-friendly interface and support make it accessible for small to medium businesses (SMBs) without dedicated email security teams. Large organizations (Enterprise) benefit from its comprehensive feature set, scalability, and the ability to manage complex domain portfolios. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) can leverage DMARC 25 to offer DMARC monitoring services to their clients, simplifying management with its intuitive platform.
This tool is primarily for technically proficient users who prefer to control their infrastructure.
It is generally not ideal for most SMBs unless they have strong in-house IT expertise and a preference for open-source solutions to avoid recurring costs. It may be considered by enterprises with robust DevOps teams and specific requirements for data residency or custom integrations, but usually as a component rather than a standalone solution. MSPs could potentially customize and integrate it for clients, but the lack of native multi-tenancy and dedicated support would require significant upfront development and ongoing maintenance effort.

How does DMARC 25 compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC 25's primary drawback is its lack of public pricing transparency, requiring direct contact for cost details. While it offers a managed solution, businesses might find this opaque pricing a barrier. For Docker DMARC Reports, the main limitation is its reliance on significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, coupled with a lack of advanced features and dedicated support. It's a free solution but demands a considerable time investment.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARC 25 requires contacting them directly for pricing, while Docker DMARC Reports is a free, self-hostable open-source solution.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free, self-host
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free, self-host
Large
Contact for pricing
Free, self-host
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free, self-host

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC 25 or Docker DMARC Reports?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions