Suped

Agari Brand Protection vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer

Choose Agari for comprehensive enterprise security, Techsneeze for free, self-hosted DMARC reporting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Agari Brand Protection goes far beyond basic DMARC reporting. It integrates DMARC enforcement with a broader suite of brand protection capabilities, focusing heavily on threat intelligence and advanced analytics. We found it meticulously parses DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, presenting data through an intuitive dashboard designed for security professionals. Its strength lies in its ability to correlate DMARC data with other threat vectors, offering a holistic view of email-borne risks.
Agari also provides features for rapid incident response, allowing teams to quickly identify and mitigate brand impersonation attacks. The reporting capabilities are extensive, offering granular data that helps identify legitimate senders and block malicious ones. It's built for organizations where email security is a critical, complex undertaking, demanding robust, integrated solutions.
The Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer offers a straightforward approach to DMARC reporting. Its core function is to parse and display DMARC aggregate reports, providing a clear overview of authentication results for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. We appreciate its simplicity, as it focuses purely on presenting the raw DMARC data in an accessible format without the bells and whistles of commercial platforms.
The viewer requires self-hosting, giving users complete control over their data and infrastructure. While it doesn't offer advanced threat intelligence or automated response features, it excels at its primary task, making DMARC data readable. It's an excellent choice for those who prefer a hands-on approach and only need to visualize their DMARC reports without additional security layers.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Agari Brand Protection feels like operating a sophisticated security console. The interface is professional and dense, reflecting the depth of features it offers. For experienced security analysts, the dashboards are rich with actionable insights and configurable views, allowing for deep dives into specific threats or email streams. However, for a novice, the sheer volume of data and options can be overwhelming, presenting a steep learning curve.
We found the initial setup and configuration require a solid understanding of DMARC and email authentication, as well as some familiarity with enterprise security platforms. While powerful, the user journey is geared towards those who need extensive control and detailed forensic capabilities, rather than quick, simple oversight.
The user experience with the Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is decidedly minimalist. Once self-hosted and configured, the interface is clean and functional, prioritizing data readability over complex interactions. We found the reports are presented in a tabular format, making it easy to see DMARC, SPF, and DKIM alignment at a glance. It's a "what you see is what you get" kind of tool.
Installation and ongoing maintenance, however, fall squarely on the user's shoulders. This requires technical proficiency in setting up web servers, databases, and PHP environments. While the daily use of the viewer is straightforward, getting it operational is not for the faint of heart or those lacking sysadmin skills. It's a tool built by and for technical users.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Agari (now Fortra) typically offers enterprise-grade support, which means dedicated account managers, technical support teams, and comprehensive documentation. Our experience suggests a structured support system designed to handle complex deployment and operational issues. The nature of their clientele demands high availability and expert assistance, especially when dealing with active email threats or policy enforcement.
However, as with many large enterprise solutions, responsiveness can sometimes be measured in business hours rather than instant replies, as one review highlighted. While the expertise is undoubtedly there, direct access might be tiered based on service level agreements, making it less agile for minor queries but robust for critical incidents.
As an open-source project, the Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer relies primarily on community support. This means documentation, forums, and potentially direct engagement with the developer via platforms like GitHub. We've found this model to be effective for technically savvy users who are comfortable troubleshooting issues or contributing to the knowledge base themselves.
Formal support channels, such as phone or email hotlines, simply don't exist. This can be a significant drawback for organizations that require guaranteed service level agreements or immediate, guided assistance. Your "support" largely depends on your own technical abilities and the generosity of the open-source community.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
This solution is tailor-made for large enterprises and organizations with significant brand value at risk from email-based attacks. Its comprehensive suite of features, including advanced threat intelligence, DMARC enforcement, and incident response, makes it ideal for security teams managing complex email ecosystems.
For MSPs, Agari Brand Protection could be suitable for managing high-value clients who require top-tier email security, but the cost structure might be prohibitive for smaller clients. It's not designed for the general SMB market, which would find its feature set overkill and its pricing inaccessible. It is highly suitable for enterprise clients.
The Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is best suited for individual developers, small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) with in-house technical expertise, or IT departments looking for a free, self-hostable DMARC reporting solution. It's an excellent choice for those who want full control over their data and infrastructure and have the technical resources to set up and maintain the system.
MSPs might find it useful for clients who are extremely budget-conscious and have simple DMARC reporting needs, provided the MSP is willing to manage the self-hosting. It is generally not suitable for enterprise environments due to the lack of formal support, advanced features, and scalability inherent in self-hosting. It is highly suitable for SMBs with technical staff.

How does Agari Brand Protection compare with Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Agari Brand Protection is a powerful enterprise tool, but its complexity and cost can be deterrents for smaller organizations, and its support response times might not always be instant. Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer offers a free, open-source solution, but demands significant technical expertise for setup and maintenance, and entirely lacks commercial support or advanced features.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Descent Email Security
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection? I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic. What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection? The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further. What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you? It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
Ritika D.
Senior Analyst Computer Software Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Agari Brand Protection operates on an enterprise-level pricing model, requiring direct contact for quotes, while Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is an open-source tool, completely free but with self-hosting costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Agari Brand Protection or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Agari Brand Protection vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped