Agari Brand Protection is a robust, enterprise-grade DMARC solution designed to offer comprehensive email security and brand defense. We have found it provides extensive DMARC report analysis, correlating data from various sources to give a holistic view of email traffic. It excels in identifying legitimate senders versus potential threats.
Beyond standard DMARC, Agari integrates advanced threat intelligence and machine learning to detect sophisticated phishing and spoofing attempts. It automates policy enforcement and offers detailed forensic capabilities, which we consider crucial for large organizations dealing with complex email ecosystems.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) stands out as an open-source, self-managed DMARC reporting tool. It provides core DMARC report analysis, allowing users to gain visibility into their email authentication. We appreciate its commitment to transparency and user control, making it a viable option for those with the technical expertise to deploy and maintain it.
While focused on fundamental DMARC functionality, Fraudmarc CE is quite capable of processing DMARC aggregate reports and presenting the data. However, users should be prepared to handle much of the advanced configuration and integration work themselves, as it lacks many of the automated features found in commercial offerings.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
From our experience, Agari Brand Protection offers a professional and comprehensive user interface. It is designed for enterprise users, meaning it can be quite feature-rich and may require a learning curve for those unfamiliar with advanced email security platforms. The dashboards are extensive, offering deep insights into DMARC compliance and threat landscapes.
While powerful, navigating the array of features and configuring intricate policies can be a complex task. It is certainly not a 'set it and forget it' tool for the average user, necessitating a team with a strong understanding of email authentication protocols and security best practices.
Fraudmarc Community Edition offers a distinctly different user experience, tailored for technically proficient individuals. As a self-managed, open-source solution, its initial setup and ongoing management are command-line or self-hosted UI driven. This means a solid grasp of server administration and DMARC principles is essential.
The interface, once deployed, is functional for displaying DMARC reports, but it prioritizes raw data and configuration over sleek design or user-friendly wizards. We appreciate its minimalist approach, but it definitely appeals to a niche audience comfortable with a hands-on, DIY ethos rather than a polished, plug-and-play solution.
Which product has the best support
Support
Agari Brand Protection typically offers dedicated support channels, which is expected for an enterprise solution. This usually includes direct access to support teams for troubleshooting, policy guidance, and strategic advice. While comprehensive, a user review noted that support could be 'a little slow,' indicating potential areas for improvement in response times.
For critical email security infrastructure, prompt and knowledgeable support is paramount. Our observations suggest that Agari's support is generally effective for complex issues, but users should manage expectations regarding immediate turnaround for every query.
Fraudmarc Community Edition, true to its name, relies on community-driven support. This means assistance is primarily available through forums and collaborative online spaces, such as community.fraudmarc.com. For users comfortable with self-help and peer-to-peer problem-solving, this model can be highly effective and empowering.
However, for urgent or highly specific issues, the response time can vary greatly, and there is no guarantee of immediate, professional intervention. This support structure makes Fraudmarc CE less suitable for organizations that require guaranteed service level agreements (SLAs) or hands-on assistance from a vendor's team.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Agari Brand Protection is best suited for large enterprises and organizations with complex email environments that require advanced DMARC enforcement, brand protection, and detailed threat intelligence. It is also highly suitable for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who manage security for multiple enterprise clients, offering multi-tenancy capabilities and comprehensive reporting.
For Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) without dedicated security teams, Agari might be an overkill, both in features and cost. Its strength lies in its ability to tackle sophisticated, large-scale email security challenges, making it an excellent choice for organizations where email security breaches can have significant financial and reputational impacts.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is ideal for technically savvy individuals, small businesses with internal IT expertise, or developers who prefer an open-source, self-hosted solution. It’s also suitable for MSPs who wish to build custom DMARC reporting solutions on an open-source base, but it requires significant development effort.
This edition is less suitable for non-technical SMBs or large enterprises that require fully managed services, dedicated support, and advanced features out-of-the-box. While free, the 'cost' comes in the form of required technical proficiency and time investment for deployment and maintenance. It is an excellent choice for those who value control and transparency over convenience.
How does Agari Brand Protection compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?
DMARC report analysis
Ability to process and interpret aggregate DMARC reports.
Source detection
Identification of sending sources for your domain.
Forward detection
Identifies when emails are forwarded by recipients.
Requires advanced configuration or custom development.
Spoof detection
Detects unauthorized use of your domain in email.
Notifications and alerts
Real-time alerts for policy changes or suspicious activity.
Not built-in, requires custom integration.
Reporting
Comprehensive dashboards and customizable reports.
API
Programmatic access for integration with other systems.
Open source, but no official programmatic API for integration as a service.
Multi-tenancy
Manage multiple domains or client accounts from one interface.
Not designed for multi-client management out-of-the-box.
SPF flattening
Reduces SPF lookup count to avoid limits.
Available in other Fraudmarc products, not CE.
Hosted DMARC
Vendor manages your DMARC DNS records.
Requires self-hosting and manual DNS record management.
BIMI
Brand Indicators for Message Identification support.
Not a focus of the community edition.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for email encryption and reporting standards.
Not integrated into the community edition.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring against email blacklists (or blocklists) and sender reputation.
Focused purely on DMARC, not broader reputation.
AI copilot
AI-driven insights or automated recommendations.
Not a feature of the open-source platform.
DNS monitoring
Keeps track of your domain's DNS records.
Requires external tools or manual monitoring.
Self hostable
Ability to host the software on your own infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a trial period or a permanently free version.
Pricing available on request, no public free tier.
Community Edition is free and open source.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Agari Brand Protection, while powerful, can present challenges in its policy curation and the noted slowness of support, which can be critical for enterprise environments. Fraudmarc Community Edition, conversely, requires significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, and its reliance on community support means less formal assistance for complex issues.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Descent Email Security
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection?
I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic.
What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection?
The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further.
What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Agari Brand Protection requires direct contact for pricing details across all tiers, while Fraudmarc Community Edition is offered as a free, self-managed solution, though Fraudmarc also provides paid DMARC services.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-managed)
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-managed)
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-managed)
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-managed)
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Agari Brand Protection or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
4 / 5(1)
