Agari Brand Protection is a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution extending beyond basic DMARC. It integrates advanced threat intelligence, email authentication, and remediation capabilities to actively protect an organization's brand and customers from various email-based threats.
We found that its feature set is designed for large organizations that require robust security against sophisticated phishing, spoofing, and BEC attacks, offering detailed insights and automated policy enforcement across their email ecosystem.
Docker DMARC Reports provides fundamental DMARC reporting, parsing, and visualization through a self-hosted open-source platform. It allows users to collect and analyze aggregate DMARC reports, offering insights into email authentication results for SPF and DKIM.
This solution is focused on giving users direct access to their raw DMARC data and a basic interface to understand email sources and compliance, without the added layers of advanced threat intelligence or proactive brand protection features found in commercial tools.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Agari Brand Protection offers a sophisticated dashboard with deep analytical capabilities and extensive configuration options. While incredibly powerful, we found that its comprehensive nature can lead to a steeper learning curve, particularly for users new to advanced email security platforms.
The platform is generally intuitive once familiarized, providing a robust interface for security professionals to manage and monitor their email channels effectively. Its strengths lie in the depth of information and control it provides.
Docker DMARC Reports requires a significant initial technical setup, involving database configuration, DMARC record creation, and Docker image deployment. The user experience after setup is functional for viewing parsed DMARC data, but it lacks the polished interface and advanced features of commercial alternatives.
We observed that users comfortable with command-line operations and server management will find it manageable, but those expecting a plug-and-play solution or a highly interactive graphical user interface might find it challenging and less user-friendly.
Which product has the best support
Support
Agari Brand Protection typically offers dedicated support teams and enterprise-level service level agreements (SLAs), reflecting its target audience of large organizations. This means access to professional assistance for setup, troubleshooting, and strategic guidance.
However, one G2 review indicated that support can be 'a little slow,' suggesting that while comprehensive, response times might sometimes vary. For enterprise customers, robust support infrastructure is a critical factor in managing complex security solutions.
Docker DMARC Reports, being an open-source project, relies primarily on community support through platforms like GitHub. There are no formal SLAs or dedicated support staff, meaning users are responsible for self-troubleshooting or seeking help from the open-source community.
While active developers and users may offer assistance, the depth and speed of support can be inconsistent. This model is suitable for users with the technical expertise to resolve issues independently or contribute to the project themselves.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Agari Brand Protection is best suited for large enterprises and organizations with significant brand value, a high volume of email communication, and complex security requirements. It's ideal for those prioritizing advanced threat protection, proactive brand defense, and compliance.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs) handling numerous clients with diverse and critical email security needs, Agari provides a robust, scalable platform. It's less ideal for Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) due to its comprehensive feature set and associated cost, unless they have very specific, high-risk requirements.
Docker DMARC Reports is most suitable for individual developers, small businesses, or organizations with in-house technical expertise that prefer a self-hosted solution for DMARC monitoring. It's excellent for those who prioritize cost savings and have control over their infrastructure.
It is a good fit for SMBs with technical staff looking for a free, foundational DMARC reporting tool. It is generally not recommended for large enterprises or MSPs seeking a managed, feature-rich, or scalable solution with formal support, as it would require significant internal resources for deployment and maintenance.
How does Agari Brand Protection compare with Docker DMARC Reports?
DMARC report analysis
Analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Advanced, comprehensive analysis with detailed insights.
Basic parsing and visualization of DMARC data.
Source detection
Identifies all sending sources for a domain.
Advanced detection with threat intelligence integration.
Detects sources based on DMARC data.
Forward detection
Ability to identify email forwarding in DMARC reports.
Sophisticated algorithms for identifying email forwards.
Does not inherently detect forwards without additional custom logic.
Spoof detection
Detects unauthorized use of your domain in email.
Robust detection integrated with brand protection.
Detects spoofing based on DMARC policy enforcement.
Notifications and alerts
Proactive alerts for DMARC issues or suspicious activity.
Configurable alerts for various DMARC events and threats.
Primarily a viewer, lacks built-in real-time alerting.
Reporting
Generates detailed and customizable reports.
Detailed, customizable, and visually rich reports.
Basic tabular and graphical reports from raw data.
API
Provides an API for programmatic access to data and features.
Offers APIs for integration and automation.
Not designed with an external API.
Multi-tenancy
Manages multiple domains or client accounts from a single interface.
Designed for managing multiple domains and client portfolios.
Typically deployed as a single instance per domain or environment.
SPF flattening
Simplifies complex SPF records to avoid lookup limits.
Often included as part of a comprehensive email security suite.
Not a feature of this DMARC report viewer.
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC reporting service by the provider.
Provider hosts and manages DMARC reporting infrastructure.
Requires self-hosting and management of the service.
BIMI
Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
Often integrated for brand visibility and trust.
Beyond the scope of basic DMARC reporting functionality.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Supports MTA-STS and TLS-RPT for secure email transport.
Comprehensive email security includes these transport protections.
These advanced security protocols are not managed by this tool.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors blocklists (blacklists) and sender reputation.
Integrated with threat intelligence for reputation monitoring.
Does not include blocklist or reputation monitoring.
AI copilot
Uses AI for intelligent insights or automation.
No AI copilot features.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records for changes or misconfigurations.
Part of a holistic email security and brand protection platform.
Focuses on DMARC reports, not general DNS monitoring.
Self hostable
Can be installed and run on your own servers.
A cloud-based, managed service.
Designed specifically for self-hosting via Docker.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free option to try or use the product.
No public free trial or free tier information available.
Agari Brand Protection, while powerful, can have a steep learning curve due to its extensive features, and some users have reported that their support can be a little slow. Docker DMARC Reports, on the other hand, demands significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, and it lacks the advanced features, polished interface, and formal support of commercial offerings.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Descent Email Security
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection?
I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic.
What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection?
The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further.
What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Agari Brand Protection requires direct contact for pricing, reflecting its enterprise focus, whereas Docker DMARC Reports is a free, self-hosted open-source solution with no direct cost.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Agari Brand Protection or Docker DMARC Reports?
4 / 5(1)
