Summary
Even with seemingly good practices in place, such as proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), a clean IP reputation, and sending only to opted-in users, emails can still end up in the spam folder. This often points to deeper, less obvious issues related to domain reputation, content quality, recipient engagement, or specific mailbox provider algorithms. Troubleshooting requires a methodical approach, often starting with identifying which internet service providers (ISPs) are marking messages as spam and then isolating the potential cause.
Key findings
- ISP-specific issues: Deliverability can vary significantly between different mailbox providers, meaning good performance with one (e.g., indicated by Return Path scores) does not guarantee success with others.
- Domain reputation: Even with a good IP, a compromised or poorly performing sending domain can lead to spam placement. Testing with a different domain can help diagnose this.
- Content and engagement: Beyond obvious 'spammy' words, subtle content issues or low recipient engagement (opens, clicks, replies) can negatively impact inbox placement. High unsubscribe or complaint rates are also major red flags.
- Hidden factors: Factors like poor list hygiene, sending to inactive subscribers, or subtle technical misconfigurations beyond standard SPF/DKIM/DMARC can cause problems. For more insights, refer to our guide on why your emails fail.
Key considerations
- Diagnostic testing: Use seed testing or send identical content from different domains to isolate if the issue lies with IP, domain, or content.
- Targeted analysis: Identify which specific ISPs are causing issues. Postmaster tools (like Google Postmaster Tools) can provide valuable data on reputation and delivery to their respective networks, even if overall good.
- Engagement monitoring: Implement continuous monitoring of open rates, click-through rates, and complaint feedback loops. Low engagement can signal a problem.
- Gradual sending: If a domain is underperforming, gradually increasing sending volume (warming up) can help rebuild its reputation over time. Learn more about warming up a new subdomain.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face the frustrating challenge of emails landing in spam folders despite adhering to common best practices like using opted-in lists and avoiding overtly spammy content. Their discussions frequently highlight the nuanced nature of deliverability, where general good practices may not account for specific ISP filters or subtle reputation issues. They often suggest iterative testing and deep dives into domain and content factors.
Key opinions
- Sender reputation matters: Marketers frequently point out that even if IP reputation is good, issues with domain reputation can be the culprit for spam placement. Checking Google Postmaster Tools domain reputation is a common recommendation.
- ISP variability: Many marketers note that deliverability problems can be specific to certain internet service providers (ISPs), indicating that a good overall score doesn't guarantee inbox placement everywhere.
- Content and domain testing: A common strategy is to send the same email content from a different, known-good domain to see if the issue persists, which helps isolate the problem to the sending domain.
- Gradual ramp-up: If a domain is experiencing issues, marketers suggest slowing down sending volume to allow for a gradual rebuilding of sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Identify problem ISPs: Pinpoint which specific mailbox providers are routing emails to spam, as this can inform targeted solutions.
- Evaluate domain health: Conduct a thorough assessment of the sending domain's reputation, potentially using tools beyond Google Postmaster.
- Content adaptation: Even with seemingly benign content, subtle elements might trigger spam filters. Marketers should review content critically or test variations.
- Consider email service provider (ESP) impact: If using a shared IP from an ESP, understand that other senders on the same IP can affect your deliverability. Check this article on email spam reasons for more.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests checking deliverability against different ISPs, not just relying on a single reputation score like Return Path. They note that Return Path isn't comprehensive for all providers and may not reflect specific issues with individual ISPs.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks recommends sending the exact same content from a different, fully authenticated domain to diagnose deliverability issues. If the email lands in the inbox from the new domain, it strongly indicates that the original domain's reputation is the root cause of the problem.
What the experts say
Even when best practices are in place, experts frequently point to the complexities of deliverability, where a single metric (like IP reputation) doesn't tell the whole story. They highlight the critical role of domain reputation, recipient engagement metrics, and the ever-evolving nature of ISP spam filters. A holistic view, combining technical setup with sender behavior and audience interaction, is consistently emphasized.
Key opinions
- Holistic reputation: Experts emphasize that it's not just IP reputation, but a combination of IP, domain, and content reputation that determines inbox placement. A good IP can be undermined by a poor domain reputation.
- Engagement is key: Recipient engagement (opens, clicks, replies, non-complaints) is a paramount factor for ISPs. Low engagement signals lack of interest and can lead to spam folder delivery, even for legitimate mail. This is why increasing email click-through rate is important.
- Feedback loops and complaints: High complaint rates, even from a small percentage of recipients, severely damage sender reputation and lead to spam folder placement.
- List hygiene: Sending to inactive or unengaged subscribers can hurt deliverability. Regular list cleaning and re-engagement campaigns are crucial. Having inactive or dormant subscribers is a common reason for spam folder delivery.
Key considerations
- Monitor all metrics: Beyond authentication and IP score, constantly monitor open rates, click-through rates, unsubscribe rates, and complaint rates across different ISPs.
- Segment and personalize: Improved segmentation and personalization can boost engagement, signaling positive intent to spam filters.
- Warm-up new domains: If migrating to a new domain, ensure a proper warm-up process to build its reputation slowly and steadily. This helps to avoid issues like emails going to spam after IP warming.
- Blacklist monitoring: Regularly check if your IP or domain has been listed on any significant email blocklists or blacklists. Even temporary listings can cause issues.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from SpamResource suggests that even with perfect technical setup, content quality and audience engagement are paramount. They argue that email providers are increasingly evaluating how recipients interact with emails, not just technical compliance.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise notes that a good IP reputation is only one piece of the puzzle. They highlight that domain reputation, especially the reputation of the 'from' domain, is often a stronger signal to mailbox providers regarding email legitimacy.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from major mailbox providers and industry standards often delves into the intricate mechanisms of spam filtering, moving beyond basic authentication. They detail how signals like user engagement, historical sending patterns, and specific content attributes contribute to a sender's reputation and, consequently, inbox placement. Adherence to these guidelines is crucial, but their complexity means subtle non-compliance can still lead to deliverability issues.
Key findings
- Reputation is dynamic: Documentation confirms that sender reputation (both IP and domain) is constantly evaluated based on recent sending history, engagement metrics, and complaint rates. This can fluctuate quickly.
- User interaction signals: Mailbox providers heavily weigh positive (opens, clicks, replies) and negative (spam complaints, deletions without reading, unsubscribes) user interactions. Negative signals can outweigh strong technical setup. The Gmail manage subscriptions feature emphasizes this.
- Content guidelines: Beyond obvious spam, technical documentation suggests that HTML formatting, image-to-text ratio, and link structure can influence spam scoring. It's not just about what you say, but how you say it.
- Authentication strictness: While SPF, DKIM, and DMARC might be 'verified,' documentation often details nuances like alignment requirements and enforcement policies that can still lead to failures. For example, understanding DMARC policy transitions is key.
Key considerations
- Regular reputation checks: Continuously monitor your sending IP and domain reputation through available postmaster tools and services. Understand that reputation is fluid.
- Adherence to best practices beyond authentication: Ensure your list acquisition practices are impeccable and that you maintain strict list hygiene by removing unengaged or invalid addresses to avoid spam traps.
- Content optimization: Regularly review and test your email content, including subject lines, body text, and HTML structure, to ensure it doesn't inadvertently trigger spam filters.
- Respond to feedback loops: Actively participate in ISP feedback loops to promptly identify and remove recipients who mark your emails as spam, which is crucial for reputation management.
Technical article
Google's documentation states that email deliverability is primarily influenced by sender reputation, which is calculated based on factors like IP and domain history, spam complaint rates, and user engagement metrics such as opens, clicks, and replies. Consistent positive engagement signals trustworthiness.
Technical article
RFC 5322, the standard for internet message format, emphasizes that proper email headers and formatting are essential for mail exchange agents (MXAs) to process messages correctly. Deviations can lead to delivery issues, even if not directly spam classification.
Related resources
5 resources
Related pages
Why are emails going to Gmail spam despite good sender score and setup?
Why do emails go to spam despite good Google Postmaster Tools reputation?
Why are my low-volume emails going to spam despite having SPF and DKIM set up?
Why are my emails being marked as spam even with good domain reputation?
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
An in-depth guide to email blocklists
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why are my emails still going to spam despite good practices?
