Suped

Summary

Many businesses using cold email outreach face the common problem of their messages landing in the spam folder, leading to significantly reduced engagement rates. This issue is particularly prevalent in B2B environments, where corporate spam filters are becoming increasingly sophisticated. While senders may perceive their emails as highly targeted and relevant, mail service providers (MSPs) and recipients often view unsolicited bulk emails as spam, regardless of their perceived value. The use of separate domains or third-party sending platforms for cold outreach, intended to protect a main domain's reputation, can paradoxically signal spamming behavior to ISPs. Understanding the nuances of sender reputation, email authentication, and recipient engagement is crucial for improving inbox placement and ensuring your cold emails reach their intended audience.

What email marketers say

Email marketers and sales professionals often grapple with the challenge of cold emails landing in spam, despite efforts to personalize and target their outreach. Many believe their emails are valuable and solicited (even if indirectly), but recipient inboxes and corporate filters are increasingly discerning. The prevailing sentiment among marketers is that while cold outreach can be effective when done right, it requires significant attention to detail and adherence to best practices to avoid being flagged as spam. There's a clear emphasis on the recipient's perception of relevance over the sender's intent.

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that cold emailing itself is inherently the issue, implying that such unsolicited communications are always at risk of being flagged as spam. This perspective highlights the fundamental challenge in cold outreach, where the absence of prior consent often dictates deliverability outcomes.

12 Feb 2020 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Email Marketer from Nureply emphasizes the need for comprehensive strategies to navigate spam filters and ensure email deliverability, especially for cold campaigns. This suggests that a multi-faceted approach, beyond just basic sending, is required to achieve inbox placement in today's environment.

11 Feb 2025 - Nureply

What the experts say

Deliverability experts universally agree that cold emails, by definition, are unsolicited and therefore carry a high risk of being treated as spam. They highlight that corporate email systems are becoming increasingly sophisticated, using advanced techniques like fingerprinting to identify and filter out such mail streams, even when senders attempt to obscure their origin with different domains or third-party tools. Experts emphasize that the recipient's perception of relevance and explicit consent are the ultimate arbiters of inbox placement, not the sender's intent or targeting efforts.

Expert view

Deliverability expert from Email Geeks explains that ISPs have advanced countermeasures against senders using different domains to evade detection. This means that merely changing the sending domain for cold outreach is unlikely to fool sophisticated spam filters.

12 Feb 2020 - Email Geeks

Expert view

Deliverability expert from SpamResource highlights that deliverability encompasses not only initial inbox placement but also sustained presence, stressing the importance of sender reputation. A single poorly executed campaign can have lasting negative effects on your domain's standing.

20 Feb 2024 - SpamResource

What the documentation says

Official documentation from major Mail Service Providers (MSPs), industry standards, and regulatory bodies provides a clear framework for email deliverability that often conflicts with aggressive cold outreach strategies. While not explicitly discouraging all forms of unsolicited communication, these sources emphasize the importance of permission, proper authentication, and responsible sending practices. They detail how spam filters operate and what criteria are used to determine inbox placement, underscoring that compliance with technical and behavioral best practices is paramount to avoiding spam folders.

Technical article

Google Postmaster Tools documentation indicates that monitoring your spam rate, IP reputation, and domain reputation is essential for understanding Gmail's perception of your sending practices. These metrics provide direct feedback on how your emails are being classified by Gmail's filters.

10 Jan 2025 - Google Postmaster Tools

Technical article

Microsoft 365 Exchange Online Protection (EOP) documentation explains that it employs a multi-layered approach to anti-spam protection, including connection filtering, spam filtering, and outbound spam protection. This comprehensive strategy aims to block unwanted mail at various stages of delivery.

05 Mar 2025 - Microsoft 365 EOP

13 resources

Start improving your email deliverability today

Get started