The IP_IN_CIDR error, particularly when encountered with .dk (Danish) domains, signifies that the recipient’s mail server is rejecting incoming mail because the sender’s IP address falls within a specified IP range (CIDR block) that is subject to a specific blocking policy. This often indicates a block at the recipient's end, which may not be a standard public blocklist. Instead, it could be a private blocklist, a targeted network block, or even a geo-fencing policy. Unlike common rejections due to PTR record issues or general public blocklisting, this error suggests a more specific, internal filtering rule on the receiving server. Resolution typically requires direct communication with the recipient's postmaster or investigation into less common blocking mechanisms. For a deeper understanding of bounce messages, explore what the bounce message IP_IN_CIDR means and its causes.
Key findings
Specific error: The IP_IN_CIDR error points to a specific blocking mechanism on the recipient's side, where the sender's IP is within a blocked CIDR range.
Not public blocklist: Despite checks, the sender's IP is typically not found on common public blacklists, suggesting a private or localized block.
Beyond PTR issues: The error is distinct from PTR record problems, even when bounce messages include both the PTR and IP.
Geo-fencing potential: Some instances of this error have been linked to recipient servers implementing geo-fencing policies that inadvertently block legitimate senders.
Localized issues: There are reported cases of this specific error affecting emails sent to certain Danish ISPs (e.g., YouSee.dk) since particular dates, indicating potential localized network or ISP policy changes.
Key considerations
Contact postmaster: The most effective step is to directly contact the postmaster or technical support of the recipient's domain for clarification and potential whitelisting of your IP.
Private blocklists: Recognize that the block might be on a private blocklist or an internal reputation service, which would not show up on public checks. Regular blocklist monitoring can help identify issues even if they are not public.
Review other bounces: Analyze bounce messages from other mailbox providers (MBPs) to identify any common patterns or additional indicators of blocking.
SPF record verification: Although less common for IP_IN_CIDR, some older mail server configurations might misinterpret SPF records (e.g., ~all vs. -all), leading to unexpected rejections. For instance, some providers issue access denied errors like 550; 5.7.515 for various policy violations.
What email marketers say
Email marketers facing IP_IN_CIDR errors, especially when targeting .dk domains, often express frustration due to the obscure nature of the rejection. Their initial troubleshooting typically involves checking public blocklists and PTR records, only to find these are not the root cause. Marketers highlight the challenges of dealing with localized or private blocklists and the necessity of direct communication with postmasters at the affected domains. They also share anecdotal experiences, such as the surprising impact of SPF configurations on certain mail servers, emphasizing that sometimes the issue lies with the recipient's server setup rather than the sender's. These experiences underscore the importance of persistence and a multi-faceted approach to resolving such complex deliverability challenges. Understanding how email blocklists work is crucial here.
Key opinions
Obscure error: Marketers find the IP_IN_CIDR error particularly difficult to debug with standard tools or online searches.
Not standard issues: They confirm that public blocklists and PTR records are often not the cause, leading to a hunt for less common problems.
Recipient-side focus: The consensus is that the issue likely resides with the recipient’s mailbox provider, potentially due to internal policies or misconfigurations.
SPF nuances: Some marketers have anecdotally resolved similar issues by making specific, counter-intuitive changes to their SPF records, indicating unusual server interpretations.
ISP specific problems: Reports suggest certain Danish ISPs, like YouSee.dk, have experienced widespread IP_IN_CIDR issues, indicating a potentially localized problem.
Key considerations
Direct engagement: Marketers must be prepared to directly contact the receiving domain’s postmaster or abuse desk for resolution.
Beyond public lists: Do not rely solely on public blocklist checks; the problem often lies with internal, private blocklists or policies. Consider situations where your organization is blacklisted by an internal reputation service.
Detailed bounce analysis: Carefully examine all bounce messages for subtle clues beyond the immediate IP_IN_CIDR error, as they may indicate other underlying issues.
ISP-specific quirks: Be aware that certain ISPs or country-specific domains (like .dk) may have unique filtering mechanisms or recent policy changes that contribute to these errors.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that they are experiencing the 554 5.7.1 <proper.hostname.for.ip[1.1.1.1]>: Client host rejected: IP_IN_CIDR error when mailing to .dk domains. They initially checked PTR records and public blocklists, but neither revealed the cause, leading them to suspect a .dk specific blocklist.
19 May 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks notes that their IP is not blocked on any public blocklist, which suggests the issue is more nuanced than a typical blacklisting. They plan to contact the postmasters directly to investigate further.
19 May 2021 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts concur that the IP_IN_CIDR error points to a specific block on the IP or network by the recipient’s mailbox provider, often indicating a private or localized blocklist rather than a public one. They emphasize the critical importance of checking internal blocklists and, if no direct cause is found, reaching out to the postmaster at the receiving domain. Experts highlight that such issues can sometimes stem from unique or even accidental geo-fencing configurations on the recipient's side, which are difficult to debug without direct communication. While SPF records are typically foundational for authentication, experts acknowledge that unusual server configurations can lead to unexpected rejections, even for seemingly correct SPF policies. Understanding what a DNSBL is and how it affects deliverability is a core competency here.
Key opinions
IP/Network level block: The error strongly suggests a block applied at the IP or network level by the recipient's mailbox provider.
Private vs. public: It's highly probable that the IP is listed on a private blocklist or subject to an internal filtering rule, rather than a widely used public blocklist.
Postmaster is key: Reaching out to the recipient's postmaster is the primary and most effective troubleshooting step when other common solutions fail.
Geo-fencing as a cause: Accidental or intentional geo-fencing by the receiving server can lead to such rejections.
SPF intricacies: While rare for this specific error, some legacy or non-standard server configurations might misinterpret SPF policies (e.g., ~all vs. -all) leading to blocks.
Key considerations
Comprehensive checks: Thoroughly check IP reputation beyond public blocklists, including less common or private sources if accessible.
Systematic bounce analysis: Analyze all available bounce messages for consistent patterns or additional error codes that might provide clues. This includes verifying DMARC, SPF, and DKIM alignment.
Persistence with postmasters: Be prepared for a potentially lengthy process of communication with recipient postmasters, providing detailed logs and asking precise questions.
Network policy understanding: Recognize that recipient networks may have unique filtering rules, including geo-IP blocking or specific CIDR block blacklisting, that are not transparent.
External resources: Consult expert blogs like Word to the Wise or Spam Resource for insights into complex deliverability issues and ISP behaviors.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks suggests that an IP_IN_CIDR error sounds like a block on the IP or the entire network by the recipient mailbox provider. They recommend checking if the IP is listed anywhere, and if not, reading other bounce messages for indicators of blocking.
19 May 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks confirms that reaching out to the postmaster or the proper channel is the correct path when facing obscure blocks. They shared an anecdote about accidentally blocking a contact through geo-fencing, which took time to debug.
19 May 2021 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Mail server documentation and internet standards (RFCs) describe various reasons why an IP address might be rejected, including being found within a CIDR block marked for rejection. This can be due to Real-time Blackhole Lists (RBLs) that list entire IP ranges, or locally configured Access Control Lists (ACLs) based on reputation, geographic location, or prior abuse. The IP_IN_CIDR error message itself suggests a direct lookup against such a list or rule. While SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are crucial for authentication, even perfectly configured records can be bypassed if the recipient server's initial IP reputation check blocks the connection before authentication occurs. Some historical or niche mail server software (like older Postfix versions) might also exhibit unique behaviors or interpretations of standard protocols that lead to unexpected rejections for specific configurations. For more information on common errors, refer to resources like URIports' guide on error 550; 5.7.515.
Key findings
ACL and RBL mechanisms: Mail servers use Access Control Lists (ACLs) and Real-time Blackhole Lists (RBLs) that can block connections based on IP ranges (CIDR blocks), often for reputation management or policy enforcement.
Local policy application: The IP_IN_CIDR error indicates a local policy on the receiving server that has flagged the sender's IP or its network segment.
Pre-authentication block: Such errors often occur during the SMTP connection phase, meaning the rejection happens before SPF, DKIM, or DMARC authentication can even be evaluated.
SPF policy nuances: Some mail server implementations (e.g., older Postfix versions) might interpret ~all in SPF records differently than -all, potentially leading to unexpected rejections or soft-failures that are then converted to hard rejections.
Geographic filtering: Some documentation outlines geo-IP filtering capabilities in mail servers, where connections from specific countries or regions are blocked, which could encompass CIDR ranges.
Key considerations
Review local server logs: Examine the recipient mail server's logs for more detailed error codes or reasons behind the IP_IN_CIDR rejection, if access is granted.
SPF policy strictness: Ensure your SPF record uses -all (fail) if you are certain about your sending infrastructure, as ~all (softfail) can sometimes be interpreted inconsistently by older systems. Consider SPF DNS timeouts as well.
Network reputation: Understand that the reputation of your entire CIDR block (the range of IPs your sending IP belongs to) can influence deliverability, even if your specific IP is not publicly listed.
Adherence to RFCs: While RFCs provide guidelines, actual server implementations can vary, necessitating direct communication with recipient administrators for bespoke solutions. For example, RFC 5321 (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) outlines general error codes.
Technical article
RFC Documentation on SMTP error codes specifies that a 554 5.7.1 'Client host rejected' error often indicates a general policy violation by the sending host. This can include issues related to IP reputation or being listed on a blocklist.
22 Jun 2020 - RFC 5321
Technical article
Postfix Documentation on access controls details how administrators can implement CIDR-based rules for rejecting incoming mail. This typically involves 'reject_rbl_client' or 'check_client_access' directives that apply policies based on IP ranges.