Summary
Many email senders are encountering issues with receiving feedback loop (FBL) messages in the new Yahoo Sender Hub, even after successfully enrolling their domains. This problem often arises despite a strong sender reputation and ongoing complaints being received from other providers. The primary challenge appears to be related to the transition from Yahoo's older FBL program to the new Sender Hub, leading to a temporary halt or redirection of complaint data. Understanding the nuances of this migration and the new system's operational priorities is crucial for troubleshooting.
Key findings
- Enrollment status: Domains appear as "enrolled" in the new Yahoo Sender Hub, but FBL messages may still not be delivered to the specified target address.
- Prioritization of new FBL: Yahoo's system is designed to deduplicate and prioritize the new Sender Hub database over the old FBL program. If a domain is enrolled in both, reports should ideally go to the new system. However, this transition may not be immediate or seamless.
- Time for activation: There can be a delay for FBLs to start sending after domains are enabled in the new Sender Hub, even if a significant volume of emails is being sent.
- DKIM requirement: Yahoo's Complaint Feedback Loop program primarily supports DKIM-signed emails. Ensure your emails are properly authenticated. Learn more about email authentication standards.
Key considerations
- Check existing FBLs: If you are still receiving FBLs from Yahoo's old program, prioritize resolving access to that account or confirm the transition to the new hub. Consider if you need a Yahoo Sender Hub account.
- Contact support: If problems persist after a reasonable waiting period (e.g., 7 days or more), contact Yahoo's dedicated sender support with specific details of your setup and the issue. This is often the most direct path to resolution.
- Monitor complaint rates: Even without FBLs, continue monitoring your overall complaint rates from other providers to ensure your sending practices are healthy. A lack of complaints could mean good reputation, or an issue with FBL delivery.
- Ensure sufficient volume: FBLs are only generated when recipients mark emails as spam. Ensure your sending volume to Yahoo is high enough to trigger complaints if any exist. For more information on FBLs, refer to Mailgun's guide on sender reputation.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face a perplexing situation where their domains are correctly enrolled in the new Yahoo Sender Hub FBL program, yet no complaint reports are being received. This can be particularly frustrating for high-volume senders with established reputations who actively track feedback from other providers. The prevailing sentiment among marketers is one of cautious waiting, combined with a strong emphasis on verifying technical configurations and considering potential conflicts with legacy FBL enrollments. The ultimate consensus points toward direct communication with Yahoo support as the most reliable next step.
Key opinions
- Old vs. new FBL conflict: A common suspicion is that existing enrollments in Yahoo's older FBL program might be interfering with the delivery of reports to the new Sender Hub. This is particularly relevant if the old account is unmanageable or untraceable. This might be related to why Yahoo CFL reports are not being received.
- Reputation and volume: Marketers with significant sending history and healthy complaint rates from other providers often rule out low reputation or insufficient volume as reasons for missing FBLs from Yahoo.
- DKIM selector ambiguity: There is some uncertainty regarding whether explicitly adding the DKIM selector to the Sender Hub is necessary, given that the platform states it covers all messages signed with the domain.
Key considerations
- Patience and observation: Allow a reasonable period (several days to a week) for the FBL system to begin sending reports, especially during a transition period to a new platform.
- Direct communication with Yahoo: If FBLs are still being received via the old system, and the new Sender Hub is not providing them, contact Yahoo's support channel. This is often the quickest route for specific account-related inquiries.
- Legacy infrastructure challenges: Be aware that legacy email infrastructure can complicate FBL management, particularly if internal forwarding or access to old mailboxes is difficult. Marketers should explore options for submitting multiple Yahoo feedback loop requests.
- Understand FBL purpose: The primary reason marketers enroll in the FBL program is to receive reports when recipients mark emails as spam, which helps in managing sender reputation. For more details, see Stack Moxie's overview of Yahoo Sender Hub.
What email marketers say
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains their situation: They successfully added and verified all sending domains for a customer in the new Yahoo Sender Hub. Each domain is enrolled in the ARF Feedback Loop program with a status of "enrolled." However, they are currently receiving absolutely no emails at the designated feedback loop target address, despite their history of managing these without issues for other clients. This lack of data is concerning given the clear enrollment status.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks notes: The domains were added to the Sender Hub approximately seven days prior to the issue. The customer's reputation is robust, with a consistent sending history of about 15 million messages per day over the past seven years. Moreover, the customer is definitely receiving complaints from other providers, albeit at a low volume of approximately 0.07% of their total mail volume. These factors suggest that the absence of Yahoo FBLs is not due to a lack of complaints or poor reputation.
What the experts say
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests several possibilities: There are typically three reasons why FBL messages might not be arriving. First, there might simply be no complaints about the customer's mail. Second, the FBL system may require some time to start sending reports after enablement. Third, the customer's reputation might not be sufficiently high enough to trigger the FBL system, even if general deliverability seems fine.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advises on switchover: It is plausible that Yahoo is not currently duplicating FBLs. This suggests there is a specific process for the switchover from the old system to the new one, which might involve manual steps or batch processing. The expert suggests that as long as FBLs are still being received from the old feed, there is no immediate cause for concern. The real issue would arise if the old feed stops without the new feed commencing.
What the documentation says
Technical article
Documentation from emailexpert.com states: The Complaint Feedback Loop (CFL) program is the primary reason an email marketer will currently want to head over and sign up for Yahoo Sender Hub if they are not already enrolled. This highlights that the core functionality of the new hub revolves around FBL management, making its proper operation essential for senders.
Technical article
Documentation from github.com (MicrosoftDocs) emphasizes FBL benefits: Feedback loops are designed to help senders monitor and reduce the number of complaints they receive, which directly impacts their reputation and sender score. Actively using FBLs is a recommended practice to maintain deliverability and prevent issues like being added to a blocklist or blacklist. When FBLs are not received, this critical monitoring capability is lost.
What the documentation says
The documentation concerning Yahoo's Sender Hub consistently points to the Complaint Feedback Loop (CFL) as its central feature. This underscores that the primary function of the hub is to provide senders with critical data on spam complaints, which is vital for maintaining a healthy sender reputation and avoiding blacklists or blocklists. Therefore, if FBL messages are not being received, it directly impedes a sender's ability to adhere to best practices and ensure optimal inbox placement. Proper authentication, particularly DKIM, is frequently cited as a prerequisite for receiving FBLs.
Key findings
- Primary feature: Yahoo Sender Hub's main and often only available feature is the Complaint Feedback Loop (CFL) service, replacing older FBL mechanisms.
- Reputation management: FBLs are essential for senders to monitor and reduce complaints, directly impacting sender reputation and avoiding blocklist or blacklist placements.
- Authentication requirement: The CFL program specifically supports DKIM-signed emails, making proper authentication crucial for FBL receipt.
- New sender requirements: The Yahoo Sender Hub is part of broader new requirements for bulk email senders, emphasizing the importance of active FBL participation.
Key considerations
- Comprehensive setup: Ensure all setup steps for the Yahoo CFL, including account creation, domain registration, and DNS record verification, are meticulously followed.
- Consistency with best practices: Beyond FBLs, general email deliverability principles like maintaining a good sender reputation and avoiding email fatigue are fundamental to minimizing complaints.
- Holistic monitoring: Even if FBLs are not received, continue monitoring other deliverability metrics and bounce codes to troubleshoot email rejection issues effectively. Understanding how Yahoo Sender Hub fits into bulk email strategies is critical.
Related resources
6 resources
Related pages
Why are Yahoo CFL reports not being received after submitting the new form?
How to submit multiple Yahoo feedback loop requests?
Do I need a Yahoo Sender Hub account for email deliverability?
Where can I find Yahoo Postmaster domain reputation data and feedback loop signup?
Which inbox providers offer feedback loops to manage complainers?
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Understanding and troubleshooting DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
How to Improve Domain Reputation Using Google Postmaster Tools [2025 Guide]
