The Apple CS02 error, typically appearing as "554 5.7.1 [CS02] Message rejected due to local policy," signifies that your email has been blocked by Apple's mail servers due to a perceived negative reputation. This often relates to the IP address from which the email originated, especially when using a shared IP. While your sending practices might be clean, shared IPs are susceptible to the aggregate behavior of all senders using that same IP, meaning one bad sender can impact everyone.
Key findings
Reputation-based: The CS02 error explicitly indicates a problem with the sender's reputation, specifically at the IP level or neighborhood. Apple's systems have flagged the sending IP as untrustworthy, leading to a block.
Shared IP vulnerability: On shared IP addresses, the actions of other senders can significantly impact your deliverability. Even if your sending practices are impeccable, the collective reputation of the shared IP can be tarnished by abusive or problematic sending from others on the same block. Learn more about issues with shared IP addresses.
Local policy block: The "local policy" aspect means that Apple's internal filters and rules have identified the sending patterns from that IP as not meeting their acceptable standards. This is distinct from global blacklists, though a global blacklist listing can contribute to this local policy decision. For context, this is similar to other Apple policy-based rejections.
Persistent issue despite engagement: The error can occur even for recipients who actively engage with your emails (open, click, visit website), highlighting that the block is IP-centric rather than recipient-specific behavior. The issue lies with the sending infrastructure, not necessarily your list hygiene. If your Mac is experiencing general network issues, Macworld offers guidance on troubleshooting IP address conflicts.
Key considerations
ESP responsibility: Since it's a shared IP, the responsibility for resolution primarily falls on your Email Service Provider (ESP). They manage the shared IP pools and are best equipped to address reputation issues with Apple. Contact their support or compliance team with the bounce details.
Monitoring blocklists: While a CS02 error is an Apple-specific block (a 'local policy'), it's still prudent to check your sending IP against major public blocklists (or blacklists), especially those known to be used by large mailbox providers, like Cloudmark. Cloudmark often plays a role in reputation filtering.
Evidence gathering: Document the full bounce messages, including the CS02 code, timestamps, and recipient domains (iCloud, Apple, me.com). This information is crucial for your ESP to diagnose and escalate the issue effectively.
Maintaining list hygiene: Continue to practice robust list hygiene, even if the current issue isn't directly caused by your practices. This includes promptly removing hard bounces and minimizing sends to disengaged subscribers to protect your sender reputation on any IP address you use.
What email marketers say
Email marketers grappling with the Apple CS02 error, especially on shared IPs, often express frustration at being caught in the middle. Their primary concern is maintaining deliverability to a crucial segment of their audience, despite using shared resources. The consensus leans towards escalating the issue to their Email Service Provider (ESP), as the problem lies with the shared IP's reputation, which the ESP is responsible for managing. Marketers often highlight their own efforts in list hygiene and segmentation, underscoring that the issue is external to their direct sending habits.
Key opinions
Shared IP challenges: Many marketers acknowledge that shared IPs inherently carry risks, as the reputation is affected by all users. This makes it challenging for individual senders to control deliverability completely, particularly with sensitive mailbox providers like Apple.
Frustration with ESPs: While ESPs are seen as the solution, there's often underlying frustration about their inability to consistently keep shared IP pools clean, especially when it impacts legitimate sending programs.
Focus on internal practices: Marketers emphasize their adherence to best practices, such as excluding machine opens and managing bounces, as proof they are not contributing to the problem. They segment their lists carefully to ensure quality engagement, as outlined in guides for improving deliverability.
Need for clear communication: There's a strong desire for clear and actionable explanations from ESPs about why such blocks occur and what steps are being taken to resolve them, particularly when dealing with major providers like Apple.
Key considerations
Proactive ESP engagement: Marketers should proactively engage with their ESP's compliance and support teams. Provide detailed bounce logs and explain your list hygiene processes to demonstrate your commitment to good sending practices.
Understanding infrastructure: It is beneficial for marketers to understand their ESP's underlying infrastructure, e.g., if they use third-party sending providers like SendGrid, as this can influence the resolution path for blocklist issues. General email deliverability issues are discussed in this comprehensive guide.
Alternatives for critical sends: For business-critical emails, consider if your ESP offers alternative shared IP pools or even dedicated IP options, although dedicated IPs have their own challenges, as explored in this article on dedicated IP blocks.
User segmentation and engagement: Continuously refining audience segmentation to target highly engaged users can mitigate some of the risks associated with shared IPs, even if it doesn't solve a blocklist issue directly. WP 301 Redirects offers an article on iOS network settings.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that the 554 5.7.1 [CS02] error from Apple/iCloud is very disappointing, especially when it's happening on a shared IP from their ESP. They maintain strict list hygiene by excluding machine opens and managing bounces, which makes the block frustrating when it affects even engaged subscribers. The core issue seems to lie with the shared IP's reputation, outside of their direct control.
17 May 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks states that even though they implement sophisticated sending logic to only target highly engaged recipients, the CS02 errors persist. They confirm their exclusion methods include looking for active engagement beyond mere machine opens, yet Apple still blocks their emails, indicating a deeper IP-level problem rather than recipient-specific behavior.
17 May 2023 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability consistently identify Apple's CS02 error as a direct indicator of a poor IP reputation. They highlight that this issue is particularly acute for shared IP addresses, where the actions of one sender can negatively affect others in the same pool. The general consensus is that ESPs bear the primary responsibility for maintaining the health of their shared IP ranges. Experts often advise checking specific reputation services like Cloudmark, which are known to influence Apple's filtering decisions. Furthermore, they emphasize the need for robust communication between senders and their ESPs to resolve such blocks promptly.
Key opinions
IP reputation as root cause: The CS02 error is almost universally attributed to the IP's reputation. Apple views the sending IP as a source of problematic mail, regardless of the individual sender's practices on that IP.
ESP accountability: For shared IPs, ESPs are expected to actively manage and mitigate reputation issues within their IP blocks. If a shared IP becomes blocklisted or experiences reputation degradation, the ESP should be the first point of contact and remediation.
Cloudmark influence: Cloudmark is frequently cited as a key reputation service that Apple incorporates into its filtering decisions. An IP listing on Cloudmark CSI-Global could directly contribute to a CS02 error. Learn why your IP might be listed on Cloudmark CSI-Global.
Policy-based block: The term "local policy" suggests Apple's internal systems have flagged the IP based on their specific, often proprietary, algorithms. These algorithms assess overall traffic patterns, spam complaints, and other signals to determine the IP's trustworthiness.
Key considerations
Direct ESP escalation: The most effective action for a sender on a shared IP is to contact their ESP's support or abuse desk with comprehensive details of the bounces. The ESP has the direct relationship with Apple and the ability to remediate the IP's reputation.
Monitoring shared IP health: While senders cannot directly delist shared IPs, they should monitor their deliverability closely and use tools that report on IP reputation to quickly identify when a shared IP is experiencing issues. Consider using a blocklist checker to stay informed.
Understanding ESP infrastructure: Be aware of your ESP's underlying infrastructure. For example, if your ESP uses a large cloud sending provider (like SendGrid), the IP reputation issues might be broader than just your ESP's segment of IPs, potentially affecting more senders.
Patience and persistence: Resolving IP reputation issues, especially with major providers, can take time. Senders should be persistent with their ESP and understand that the process involves the ESP working with Apple postmasters to rebuild trust.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks confirms that the Apple CS02 error message literally means the sender has a bad reputation. While not 100% certain on all specifics, they strongly believe it points to an issue with the IP address's standing within Apple's systems. This directly impacts deliverability to iCloud and other Apple domains.
17 May 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks expresses sympathy for senders on shared IPs, acknowledging the difficulty of keeping them clean. They understand the annoyance of being a random customer caught in a wider reputation problem. They advise that if a sender is doing nothing wrong, they should push their ESP support, as it is the ESP's responsibility to fix.
17 May 2023 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation and technical reports on email deliverability, especially from major mailbox providers, often describe bounce codes like CS02 as policy-based rejections. These typically stem from automated systems that assess the sender's reputation, including IP address standing, sending volume, complaint rates, and authentication compliance (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). While the specifics of proprietary algorithms are rarely public, the general guidance points to maintaining excellent sending hygiene and ensuring your ESP adheres to best practices for IP management. Apple's support pages provide general troubleshooting for email issues, emphasizing that deliverability relies on adherence to their guidelines.
Key findings
Policy enforcement: Bounce codes such as CS02 are a result of the receiving mail server's (e.g., Apple's) internal policies detecting an issue with the incoming email. These policies are designed to protect their users from unwanted or malicious mail. This relates to other Apple errors like CS01.
Reputation focus: Documentation implies that a key component of these local policies is sender reputation, which encompasses the IP address reputation. A poor reputation triggers the rejection, indicating that the system perceives the sender as a potential source of spam or abuse.
Shared IP challenges highlighted: While not explicitly stating CS02 in every case, general documentation on email best practices often warns about the challenges of shared IP addresses, where the actions of one sender can lead to a blocklist or blacklist for the entire IP, as highlighted in guides on IP blocklisting.
Authentication importance: Major mailbox providers emphasize the importance of email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) in their documentation. While CS02 is primarily reputation-based, proper authentication helps build and maintain a trustworthy sending identity. For general troubleshooting, Apple provides support on email sending issues.
Key considerations
Adherence to best practices: Documentation stresses the necessity of following general email sending best practices, including maintaining clean lists, managing bounces, and avoiding spam triggers. This ensures that even on a shared IP, your contribution to its reputation is positive.
ESP relationship: For shared IPs, the ESP's role in managing their IP blocks is critical. Senders should verify their ESP's commitment to deliverability and their process for addressing reputation issues with major mailbox providers like Apple.
Proactive monitoring: Senders are encouraged to monitor their deliverability, including bounce rates and any specific error codes, to quickly identify and address problems. Tools that track blocklist status can also be beneficial, as detailed in how email blacklists work.
Leveraging postmaster sites: Most major providers, including Apple, offer postmaster sites with guidelines and tools to help senders troubleshoot issues. While direct remediation of a shared IP is usually done by the ESP, understanding these resources is valuable.
Technical article
Documentation from Apple Support states that when emails are rejected due to 'local policy,' it indicates that their servers have detected content or sending patterns that violate their specific guidelines for acceptable email traffic. This measure is implemented to maintain the integrity and security of their email service and protect users from spam and abuse.
15 Mar 2023 - Apple Support
Technical article
RFC 5321 (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) outlines the general framework for email transmission, noting that receiving mail servers have the right to implement local policies to accept or reject incoming mail based on various criteria, including sender reputation. This inherent flexibility allows providers to combat evolving spam tactics.