Email bounce issues with Charter/Spectrum, particularly those related to concurrent connections, are a common challenge for senders. Unlike typical mail throttling based on volume, this problem arises when your Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) attempts to open too many simultaneous connections to Spectrum's servers. Even if you've implemented general message throttling, this specific issue can still cause significant bounce rates, impacting your overall email deliverability. Resolving it often requires a more granular adjustment of your sending infrastructure, ideally with cooperation from your Email Service Provider (ESP).
Key findings
Specific bounce message: Charter/Spectrum typically provides clear bounce messages, such as those indicating limits on concurrent connections, for example, AUP#In-1310.
Connection vs. message throttling: This issue is distinct from general email throttling (rate limiting based on messages per minute) and specifically relates to the number of active TCP connections your MTA opens.
Reputation dependence: The severity of concurrent connection limits imposed by ISPs like Spectrum often varies based on the sending IP's reputation. A lower reputation might lead to stricter limits.
ESP configuration: Proper management of concurrent connections is a configuration aspect of your email sending platform or ESP, requiring specific adjustments to your Mail Transfer Agent (MTA).
Key considerations
Review bounce logs: Thoroughly examine your email logs for the exact bounce messages from Charter/Spectrum to confirm the issue is indeed concurrent connections.
Adjust concurrent connections: Work with your ESP to decrease the number of simultaneous connections your MTA attempts with Spectrum's servers. This is different from the overall message throughput.
Communicate with your ESP: If on a dedicated IP, press your ESP to implement more aggressive connection throttling specifically for Charter/Spectrum domains like roadrunner.net and charter.net.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often report being caught off guard by concurrent connection bounces from Charter/Spectrum, even when their existing throttling mechanisms are in place. This highlights a common misunderstanding between overall message throughput and the number of simultaneous connections. Many express frustration with the lack of immediate solutions from ISPs or the perceived resistance from their own ESPs to implement more granular connection management. However, there's a general consensus that if the bounce message specifically points to concurrent connections, direct action on that front is necessary.
Key opinions
Surprising behavior: Marketers find it surprising that these bounces occur when they believe their sending is already throttled.
Distinct issue: It's commonly observed that concurrent connections are a different beast than traditional rate-limiting.
Cloudmark confusion: Even after contacting filtering services like Cloudmark, marketers sometimes receive no clear diagnosis or resolution.
Key considerations
Push for ESP action: Marketers need to be persistent with their ESPs, especially when on a dedicated IP, to implement the necessary configuration changes for throttling concurrent connections.
Document communication: Keep detailed records of all interactions with Spectrum/Charter and Cloudmark to provide to your ESP.
Aggressive adjustments: If bounces persist, be prepared to request more aggressive connection limits from your ESP, even if it seems counterintuitive.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes, We're seeing a high volume of mail bouncing for Charter/Roadrunner, and despite contacting Spectrum and Cloudmark, we haven't found a solution to the problem.
03 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks states, The bounce message indicates that Spectrum limits concurrent connections, which is surprising since our client already throttles sends, and bounces only happen about a third of the time.
03 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts agree that concurrent connection limits are a standard practice for Mailbox Providers (MBPs) to maintain network stability and prevent abuse. They highlight that this issue is fundamentally about how your sending Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) interacts with the receiving server, not just the volume of emails sent. Experts stress that proper configuration of your ESP to manage these connections is critical and that senders with dedicated IPs should expect their ESP to have robust traffic shaping rules in place. They also note that a more stringent throttle may be necessary for specific sending IPs, reflecting their real-time reputation and historical sending patterns.
Key opinions
MTA connection behavior: The problem lies with the MTA opening too many connections simultaneously, which is distinct from simple email message throttling.
Standard MBP practice: Most MBPs, including Charter/Spectrum, employ session throttling to manage inbound mail flow and prevent overwhelming their servers.
Reputation-based limits: A sender's specific reputation or historical behavior may necessitate a stricter concurrent connection throttle than standard.
ESP's role in configuration: This is primarily a configuration adjustment that the ESP should be able to implement, particularly for senders on dedicated IPs.
Key considerations
Collaborate with your ESP: Insist that your ESP adjusts your MTA's concurrent connection settings for Charter/Spectrum domains if you face these bounce issues. Solving specific delivery blocks is key.
Dedicated IP optimization: If you are on a dedicated IP, ensure your ESP has optimal concurrent connection rules for major ISPs like Spectrum, which can differ from general throttling. Consider troubleshooting common Charter/Spectrum issues.
Avoid special casing: Understand that ESPs may hesitate to special case throttling unless the problem is severe and persistent, so provide clear evidence of the issue.
Proactive reputation management: Maintain a high sending reputation to avoid triggering more restrictive connection limits from ISPs like Spectrum. For further insights, you can often find valuable information on expert blogs like Spam Resource.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarifies, The concurrent connection limit is a common slip-up for senders, distinct from simple message throttling; it means the mail transfer agent is initiating too many connections simultaneously.
03 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks notes, It's a relatively straightforward configuration adjustment that should typically be managed by the sender's Email Service Provider (ESP) on their end.
03 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation from Internet Service Providers (ISPs) like Spectrum (which includes Charter and Roadrunner) consistently outlines the technical parameters for email acceptance, including explicit limits on concurrent connections. These documents emphasize that such limits are a fundamental part of their abuse prevention policies and are applied dynamically, influenced significantly by the sender's IP reputation. They often provide clear instructions, advising senders to reduce connection attempts upon receiving specific bounce codes related to these limits. Adhering to these documented guidelines is crucial for maintaining optimal email delivery to their networks.
Key findings
Explicit limits: ISP documentation confirms that limits are placed on both the number of concurrent connections and the overall session count from a single sending source.
Reputation-based variance: These limits are explicitly stated to vary based on the sender's IP address reputation, meaning a trustworthy sender might have higher allowances.
Actionable advice: Documentation typically advises senders to reduce their number of connections and attempt to send again after a brief pause.
Abuse prevention: Concurrent connection limits are a standard anti-spam and network abuse prevention mechanism implemented by many Mailbox Providers (MBPs).
Key considerations
Adhere to guidelines: Always consult and follow the postmaster guidelines provided by major ISPs like Spectrum for their specific technical requirements.
Programmatic adjustments: Configure your sending platform to dynamically adjust concurrent connection rates based on real-time bounce feedback to comply with ISP policies.
Proactive monitoring: Implement robust monitoring for bounce logs and delivery reports to detect connection-related errors early. Being on a blocklist will worsen matters.
Understand AUPs: Familiarize yourself with the ISP's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), which often contains detailed information about email sending limitations and best practices. More information can be found at Spectrum Community's support discussions.
Technical article
Documentation from Spectrum Community states, Spectrum enforces strict limits on the number of concurrent connections from a single sender, as well as the total number of connections allowed over a given period for network stability.
07 Jan 2023 - Spectrum Community
Technical article
Documentation from Spectrum Community notes, These connection limits are not static; they are dynamically adjusted based on the real-time reputation score and historical sending patterns of the originating IP address.