Summary
Understanding the data requirements, accuracy, and freshness of key deliverability tools like Google Postmaster Tools (GPT) and Microsoft Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) is crucial for effective email sending. These platforms offer unique insights into your sender reputation and email performance at major mailbox providers. While both provide valuable data, their operational specifics, particularly regarding data volume, update frequency, and IP access, vary significantly, impacting how you use them to troubleshoot and optimize your email programs. Gaining access and accurately interpreting the data is essential for maintaining strong sender reputation and ensuring your emails reach the inbox.
Key findings
- GPT minimum volume: Google Postmaster Tools generally requires a minimum daily sending volume of around 100 emails to Gmail recipients to display data, though some reports indicate it might be higher.
- GPT data accuracy: The data in Google Postmaster Tools is considered reasonably accurate for Google's ecosystem but should be corroborated with other sources, particularly if the data appears anomalous.
- GPT data freshness: Google Postmaster Tools data typically lags by 2-3 days, meaning it does not provide real-time insights. Significant positive changes in sending behavior might take up to a month to reflect accurately.
- SNDS IP requirements: Microsoft SNDS does not strictly require a dedicated IP address; access is granted by the IP address owner, who authorizes users to view data for their IP ranges, including shared IPs. However, ESPs often only provide access for dedicated IPs.
- SNDS data points: SNDS offers data on spam complaints, Junk Mail Reporting (JMR) data, deliverability issues, and IP reputation, all specific to Outlook.com users. For more information, you can review this Mailgun blog post.
Key considerations
- Data triangulation: Always combine insights from Postmaster Tools and SNDS with your own sending data and other deliverability metrics for a holistic view of performance. For more on this, check out our guide on how accurate is SNDS and Google Postmaster Tools reputation data.
- IP ownership for SNDS: If you use an ESP, they are the IP owner and control access to SNDS data for their IPs. You will need their authorization to view shared or dedicated IP data within SNDS.
- Impact of shared IPs: On shared IPs, your reputation is influenced by other senders. While SNDS can provide some data, direct control and transparent reporting might be limited compared to dedicated IPs.
- Data latency: Given GPT's data delay, real-time troubleshooting is not feasible. For more on GPT's data specifics, refer to what are the minimum send requirements for Gmail Postmaster Tools.
What email marketers say
Email marketers widely acknowledge Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS as indispensable resources for monitoring email deliverability. They often seek clarity on the practical aspects of these tools, such as the minimum sending volumes required to populate data, the perceived accuracy of the reported metrics, and how current or 'fresh' the available data actually is. Marketers emphasize the importance of these tools for understanding their sender reputation and troubleshooting potential inbox placement issues, especially with major providers like Gmail and Outlook.com.
Key opinions
- Data presence: Many marketers report that Google Postmaster Tools starts showing data reliably once daily email volumes reach at least the low hundreds.
- Reputation insights: Marketers value both tools for providing a crucial overview of their IP and domain reputation, which directly impacts inbox placement. You can learn more about understanding your email domain reputation.
- Data consistency: There is a consensus among marketers that Google Postmaster Tools data is not real-time and typically has a delay of a few days.
- SNDS for outlook.com: Marketers frequently point to Microsoft SNDS as the primary tool for gaining insights into deliverability specifically for Outlook.com recipients.
- IP access complexities: The requirement for IP ownership authorization in SNDS can be a point of confusion for marketers, especially those using shared IP addresses from ESPs.
Key considerations
- Verifying data: It's common practice for marketers to verify the data from Postmaster Tools against other internal metrics, given that it reflects Google's unique perspective on sender reputation. Learn more about why your email deliverability rate is wrong.
- Patience with reputation changes: Marketers understand that positive changes in sending practices take time to reflect in Postmaster Tools reputation dashboards, sometimes up to a month.
- Shared vs. dedicated IPs: While SNDS can provide data for shared IPs if the owner grants access, marketers often prefer dedicated IPs for more direct control and clearer insights into their specific sending reputation.
- Strategic use: Marketers integrate data from both GPT and SNDS into their broader deliverability strategy to understand specific provider performance and identify areas for improvement. This helps in troubleshooting Microsoft email deliverability issues.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that Google Postmaster Tools typically lags by 2-3 days, indicating that real-time data should not be expected.
Marketer view
Marketer from Mailgun outlines that SNDS provides various data points including general IP data, spam complaint rates, Junk Mail Reporting data, deliverability issues, and IP reputation.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts provide nuanced perspectives on the utility and limitations of Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS. They emphasize that while these tools are invaluable for monitoring reputation and identifying issues, their data is not always real-time and requires careful interpretation. Experts delve into the specifics of data thresholds for visibility, the accuracy caveats, and the often-misunderstood IP ownership requirements for SNDS, providing critical guidance for senders looking to optimize their deliverability strategies.
Key opinions
- GPT data threshold: Experts generally agree that Google Postmaster Tools requires a minimum of around 100 emails per day to start displaying data, with volumes in the low hundreds being a common observation.
- Accuracy limitations: While GPT data is useful, experts caution that its accuracy is relative to Google's internal metrics and should be cross-referenced with other data sources, especially for unusual findings.
- Data lag: A consistent expert observation is that GPT data lags by 2-3 days, making it unsuitable for immediate, real-time issue detection or reputation changes. For more details on this, see why is Google Postmaster Tools data missing or delayed.
- SNDS IP access: Experts clarify that SNDS does not strictly demand a dedicated IP; access is contingent on authorization from the IP address owner, allowing even shared IPs to potentially be monitored if permitted.
- SNDS origin: Some experts recall that SNDS was originally designed primarily for network providers, rather than exclusively for ESPs, influencing its access and data sharing mechanisms.
Key considerations
- ESP role in SNDS: When using an ESP, experts advise that the ESP (as the IP owner) controls SNDS data access. They typically grant access only for dedicated IPs to prevent sharing sensitive customer data.
- Long-term trends: Given the data lag in Postmaster Tools, experts recommend using it for observing long-term trends and overall reputation health rather than for immediate problem-solving. This is also covered in how accurate is Microsoft SNDS data for deliverability monitoring.
- Reputation recovery: Experts emphasize that significant positive changes in sending behavior (e.g., after cleaning lists) can take up to a month to be fully reflected in Google Postmaster Tools data.
- Data transparency: The level of transparency in SNDS data for shared IPs can vary, as it relies on the IP owner's willingness to share composite reputation data.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks states that a minimum of approximately 100 emails per day is generally required for Google Postmaster Tools to display data.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advises that while the data from Google Postmaster Tools is reasonably accurate, it should be cross-referenced with other data sources if the insights appear unexpected or inconsistent.
What the documentation says
Official documentation for Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS provides foundational information on their features, data types, and access requirements. Google's documentation typically outlines the various dashboards for IP and domain reputation, spam rate, feedback loop, and authentication, along with the necessary sending volumes for data to appear. Microsoft's documentation details the process of signing up for SNDS, the types of data available, and the mechanism for IP owner authorization, which is distinct from Google's domain-based verification.
Key findings
- GPT data categories: Google Postmaster Tools categorizes data into dashboards such as spam rate, IP reputation, domain reputation, feedback loop, authentication, and encryption.
- Volume for data: Google's documentation implies a minimum threshold of significant daily email volume to Gmail for data to populate reliably, without specifying an exact number (but usually around 100).
- SNDS data types: Microsoft SNDS provides data including Junk Mail Reporting (JMR) feedback, IP status (normal, blocked), and overall email volume and complaint rates directed at Outlook.com recipients.
- SNDS IP authorization: Documentation specifies that access to SNDS data for an IP range requires authorization from the IP address owner, distinguishing it from domain-based verification in GPT. To learn more about this, check out what is Microsoft's equivalent to Google Postmaster Tools.
Key considerations
- Data aggregation: Both tools aggregate data over time, meaning instantaneous changes in sending behavior will not be reflected immediately in the dashboards.
- Scope of data: Documentation confirms that Postmaster Tools insights are specific to Gmail, and SNDS insights are specific to Outlook.com, not universal across all mailbox providers.
- Authentication standards: Documentation often emphasizes the importance of proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for data to appear accurately and for maintaining a good sender reputation in these tools. For more on this, see how to comply with outlook's new sender requirements.
- Feedback loops: Both Google and Microsoft offer feedback loops (FBLs) via their postmaster tools, which are critical for receiving spam complaint data directly from users.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun states that SNDS provides insights into general IP data, spam complaint rates, and deliverability issues for IPs sending to Microsoft recipients.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailmodo explains that Microsoft SNDS provides critical data about email campaigns, specifically measured against Outlook.com users, covering aspects like spam complaints and IP reputation.
Related resources
5 resources
Related pages
What are the minimum send requirements for Gmail Postmaster Tools and how quickly does data appear?
Why is Microsoft Outlook.com email deliverability inconsistent and how reliable is SNDS data?
Why is Microsoft SNDS data not displaying or delayed?
How accurate is SNDS and Google Postmaster Tools reputation data?
What is Microsoft's equivalent to Google Postmaster Tools for deliverability monitoring?
Ultimate guide to Google Postmaster Tools V2
How to comply with outlook's new sender requirements
Google Postmaster Tools Domain Reputation: The Ultimate Guide for Email Marketers
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why your emails fail at Microsoft: the hidden SPF DNS timeout
