The question of whether machine-generated opens occur for messages filtered to the Gmail junk folder is a nuanced one. While it might seem intuitive that emails in the junk folder would be untouched, the reality is more complex due to the various machines involved in email delivery and security scanning. These systems often download assets, including tracking pixels, regardless of the final inbox placement. This means that an 'open' might be registered even if the email never reached a user's primary inbox.
Key findings
Pre-delivery scanning: Many machines involved in the email delivery path, such as anti-spam filters and security scanners, may download email assets like images before the message is even delivered to the recipient's inbox or junk folder.
Folder irrelevance: The ultimate folder placement (inbox versus junk) does not necessarily prevent these pre-delivery scans from triggering an open. The act of downloading assets can register as an open, irrespective of the final destination.
Varied sources: Various 'machines' can trigger opens, including mail transfer agents (MTAs), antivirus software, and other security systems. These are distinct from user-initiated opens.
Temporary deferrals: In some rare instances, a mail exchange (MX) server might temporarily defer mail while still checking links or images. This can result in opens being recorded before the email is fully accepted for delivery.
Key considerations
Accuracy of open rates: Relying solely on reported open rates can be misleading, as they may include these machine-generated interactions. It is crucial to understand how to identify artificial email opens.
Deliverability metrics: While machine opens might occur, the primary goal remains inbox placement. If emails are consistently landing in the Gmail spam folder, it indicates a deliverability issue that needs addressing, regardless of recorded 'opens'.
Focus on engagement: For genuine campaign effectiveness, focus more on clicks and conversions, which are stronger indicators of actual user engagement than opens alone. Mailmodo discusses precautions to minimize spam filtering
What email marketers say
Email marketers often encounter the challenge of distinguishing genuine user engagement from automated interactions, particularly when emails are filtered to the junk folder. Opinions vary, with some believing that junked emails are exempt from machine opens, while others acknowledge the pervasive nature of automated scanning. The consensus leans towards the idea that while some machine opens might occur, their significance for engagement metrics diminishes when compared to messages landing in the primary inbox.
Key opinions
Minimal bot opens: Some marketers operate under the assumption that bot opens are significantly reduced, or non-existent, for emails that land directly in the Gmail junk folder.
Pre-filtering scans: Other marketers acknowledge that numerous machines scan emails for security or content before they are sorted, regardless of the final folder placement.
Inbox proxy for opens: There's a strong sentiment that if a machine open is detected, it's more likely that the email successfully reached the inbox rather than being junked, especially for consumer Gmail accounts with simpler delivery paths.
Open rate legitimacy: A satirical perspective suggests that if emails land in spam, any recorded opens are by definition 'legitimate' as they bypass typical inbox filters, highlighting the frustration with artificial opens.
Key considerations
Data interpretation: Marketers must carefully interpret open rate data, knowing that a portion of opens could be machine-generated, even for emails ending up in the junk folder. This is part of how Gmail "accurately tracks email opens", or not, depending on your perspective.
Focus on deliverability: Regardless of machine opens, the primary concern should be improving inbox placement. Yamm's blog details common indicators that emails are going to spam.
Engagement signals: True engagement is better measured by clicks, replies, and conversions, rather than relying on potentially inflated open rates that include artificial interactions. Understanding machine opens for emails delivered to spam is key.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that their understanding is that bot opens typically do not occur for messages that have been filtered directly to the junk folder, particularly within Gmail.
30 Sep 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks points out that it depends on the specific circumstances, as various machines can indeed trigger opens, suggesting that the situation is not always clear-cut.
30 Sep 2023 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Deliverability experts generally agree that the presence of machine-generated opens for emails sent to the junk folder is a complex issue. While it's established that various automated systems (e.g., anti-spam filters, security scanners) interact with emails before final delivery, these interactions don't necessarily equate to positive deliverability. Experts advise against over-reliance on open rates as a sole metric for success when considering potential machine interference, especially for messages not reaching the primary inbox.
Key opinions
Many intermediaries: Experts confirm that numerous machines exist between the sender and recipient, all of which can download email assets for various reasons, making folder placement irrelevant to this initial interaction.
Security scanning: Email security systems often scan messages for malware or malicious links by downloading images and other content, which can trigger an 'open' before a human recipient ever sees it.
Engagement versus scanning: An open recorded due to machine scanning is distinct from a user actively engaging with the email. This distinction is crucial for accurate deliverability analysis, especially concerning spam traps generating random opens.
Impact on metrics: While machine opens happen, their presence can inflate perceived open rates, making it harder to gauge actual recipient engagement and understand spam rate dashboards.
Key considerations
Holistic view: Deliverability experts recommend a holistic view of email performance, integrating data from clicks, conversions, and abuse reports, rather than focusing solely on open rates.
Inbox placement focus: The priority should always be on optimizing strategies to ensure emails reach the primary inbox, as machine opens in the junk folder do not contribute to positive sender reputation or user engagement.
Understanding infrastructure: Familiarity with how different ISPs and email clients process emails, including their pre-delivery scanning mechanisms, helps in interpreting deliverability data accurately. SpamResource provides insights on how email systems work.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks explains that many machines operate between the sender and recipient, and any of these can download email assets for various reasons. The folder where an email is ultimately deposited is irrelevant in this context.
30 Sep 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
A deliverability expert from SpamResource.com suggests that automated systems, such as spam filters, frequently open and scan email content, including images and links, regardless of the message's final destination. This behavior is primarily for security purposes.
14 Oct 2023 - SpamResource.com
What the documentation says
Official documentation and community forums often shed light on how email systems, including Gmail, handle messages and user interactions. While direct statements about machine-generated opens for junked mail are rare, the underlying mechanisms described for spam filtering and security scanning suggest that such interactions can and do occur. The emphasis in documentation is typically on preventing unwanted mail from reaching the inbox, and on user control over mail categorization.
Key findings
Gmail's control: Gmail has extensive internal processes for handling incoming mail, including determining if a message is spam. This process occurs before final folder placement and involves content analysis.
User action triggers: In many email clients, messages are moved to junk folders based on user instructions, such as adding a sender or domain to a blocklist or blocklist rule.
Hidden junk folders: Some documentation indicates that the junk or spam folder might be hidden by default in certain email services, requiring specific steps to view its contents.
Automated filtering: Email services use complex spam filtering algorithms that assess emails based on a score. If the score exceeds a threshold, the email is flagged as spam and routed to the junk folder.
Key considerations
Spam filter mechanisms: Understanding how various spam filters function, and the criteria they use to flag emails, is crucial for senders. Quora discussions suggest senders cannot tell if spam is opened.
Impact of blocklists: Being listed on an email blocklist or blacklist can significantly affect deliverability. Documentation often explains how your email address gets blacklisted.
Consequences of junking: If emails consistently land in the junk folder, it impacts user engagement and sender reputation. Understanding what happens when your domain is blacklisted is important.
Technical article
Documentation from Quora states that senders, whether spammers or legitimate, cannot determine user activity within Gmail after a message is opened, unless a reply is initiated immediately after opening the message.
25 Feb 2023 - Quora
Technical article
A discussion on Google Cloud Community indicates that emails generated through automations frequently end up in the recipient's SPAM folder instead of their primary inbox, which is a common problem for automated systems.