Suped

Why is SpamAssassin not relevant for modern email deliverability and what truly impacts inbox placement?

Summary

SpamAssassin was once a common tool for pre-sending email checks, particularly valued for identifying "spammy" keywords and evaluating content like image-to-text ratios. However, its relevance in modern email deliverability is minimal. Today's major mailbox providers (like Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo) largely disregard static content analysis and keyword spotting. Their sophisticated spam filters prioritize sender reputation, user engagement, and robust email authentication protocols over the specific words or formatting within an email. While SpamAssassin can still offer insights for niche business filters or provide a very basic initial check, relying on its scores for high-volume email marketing will not accurately reflect actual inbox placement, as it operates on an outdated model of spam detection.

What email marketers say

Email marketers, particularly those who have used SpamAssassin for years, often express confusion about its diminishing relevance. They observe that while it flags specific keywords (like those related to finance, perceived as "bad credit"), these warnings don't always correlate with actual inbox placement. The consensus among marketing professionals is a shift towards a reputation-first approach. They acknowledge that content might influence how an email is categorized (e.g., Gmail tabs), but it's increasingly irrelevant for determining if an email is routed to the spam folder. This perspective highlights the importance of understanding the current landscape of email filtering, which heavily favors sender reputation, engagement, and authentication.

Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks describes how SpamAssassin has been a long-standing tool for pre-deployment checks, especially for financial marketing emails. The marketer found it useful for flagging 'bad' keywords, indicating a reliance on its content-based analysis for perceived spam risks.

9 Apr 2019 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Email marketer from MartechView states that new email authentication and unsubscribe requirements are making it tougher to reach inboxes. This highlights a shift in focus from content to compliance and foundational email practices for successful delivery.

24 Oct 2024 - MartechView

What the experts say

Deliverability experts largely agree that SpamAssassin's utility in today's email ecosystem is marginal. They explain that very few major mailbox providers still use its ruleset, and even then, these rules have significantly diverged. The shift has been towards a model where user experience and sender reputation are paramount, eclipsing the importance of specific keywords or image-to-text ratios. Experts emphasize that modern spam filters, particularly for high-volume consumer mailboxes, analyze how recipients interact with emails, along with sophisticated authentication and list hygiene practices. While SpamAssassin might provide some insights for legacy B2B appliances or simple pre-checks, it's not representative of how the vast majority of emails are filtered.

Expert view

Deliverability expert from Email Geeks asserts that SpamAssassin's direct usage is minimal among modern filters. This expert notes that while some B2B appliances might have inherited related rulesets, they have significantly diverged from the original SpamAssassin logic.

9 Apr 2019 - Email Geeks

Expert view

Deliverability expert from Spamresource observes that sender reputation is now paramount, with user engagement metrics like opens and clicks heavily influencing inbox placement. This expert emphasizes that simple content analysis is no longer the primary determinant.

20 May 2024 - Spamresource

What the documentation says

Official documentation and research on email deliverability consistently highlight a shift away from simplistic, rule-based spam filtering towards more complex, adaptive systems. These systems are primarily driven by sender reputation, user engagement, and compliance with modern email authentication standards (like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM). While content is still analyzed for categorization (e.g., distinguishing transactional from marketing emails), its role in determining whether an email lands in the spam folder has diminished. The documentation emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to deliverability, where maintaining a positive sender score through good sending practices and adherence to new industry requirements is far more critical than avoiding a list of 'spammy' keywords.

Technical article

Technical documentation from Campaign Monitor states that email deliverability success is primarily measured by emails reaching the inbox without bouncing or being marked as spam. This emphasizes the ultimate outcome of email campaigns rather than focusing on internal content scores.

1 Oct 2023 - Campaign Monitor

Technical article

Technical documentation from Salesforce outlines that achieving good email deliverability involves minimizing spam flags, reducing bounce rates, and effectively managing complaints. This indicates a holistic approach to deliverability that extends far beyond simple keyword detection.

15 Sep 2023 - Salesforce

15 resources

Start improving your email deliverability today

Get started