Summary
When a subscriber marks an email as spam, Email Service Providers (ESPs) immediately take action, suppressing future messages to that address. This suppression is a critical, often permanent, measure, even if the subscriber later attempts to re-subscribe. ESPs prioritize the spam complaint as a strong signal of unwanted communication, acting defensively to protect sender reputation, maintain the integrity of their shared IP addresses, and ensure compliance with anti-spam regulations. Their systems are designed to prevent the re-mailing of addresses associated with negative signals like spam complaints, viewing the initial complaint as a definitive 'do not mail' instruction.
Key findings
- Immediate Suppression: A spam complaint, often triggered by a 'This is Spam' (TiS) button, results in an immediate suppression of the email address by the ESP, typically initiated via a feedback loop (FBL) notification from the Internet Service Provider (ISP).
- Permanent 'Do Not Mail': Many ESPs place complaining addresses on a permanent 'do not mail' or 'cleaned' suppression list for that specific sender, treating the complaint as a definitive signal of 'no consent' for future communications.
- Re-subscription Blocked: Even if a user attempts to re-subscribe, most ESPs will block or ignore these attempts to the previously suppressed address, prioritizing the initial spam complaint over a new sign-up to prevent unwanted mail.
- Reputation Protection: The primary driver for ESPs enforcing strict suppression is to safeguard the sender's reputation, protect the ESP's own shared IP addresses from being flagged as sources of spam, and prevent future deliverability issues for all their clients.
- Defensive Measures: ESPs implement these measures defensively to prevent both malicious and naive actors from repeatedly attempting to mail to addresses that have previously opted out, bounced, or filed spam complaints, thus maintaining platform integrity.
- Specific ESP Policies: Major ESPs like Mailchimp, SendGrid, HubSpot, Constant Contact, ActiveCampaign, and AWeber explicitly confirm policies of permanent suppression and blocked re-subscriptions after a spam complaint, highlighting an industry-wide standard.
Key considerations
- Prioritize ESP Policies: It is crucial to understand your Email Service Provider's (ESP) specific suppression policies, as they are the first line of defense after a spam complaint. Ignoring these can lead to further deliverability issues and reputational damage.
- Troubleshoot with ESP First: If emails appear to be 'silently dropped' without error codes, begin troubleshooting with your ESP before contacting the Mailbox Provider, as the suppression likely originates from your ESP's internal systems.
- Avoid Re-uploading Suppressed Addresses: Do not attempt to re-upload or re-add addresses that have filed spam complaints. ESPs actively prevent this, and doing so can significantly harm your sender reputation and lead to stricter penalties.
- Spam Complaints are Serious: Recognize that spam complaints are a severe signal that directly impacts your sender reputation and the deliverability of your emails across all recipients. They are not to be taken lightly by any marketer.
- Complex Re-opt-in: For some ESPs, re-activating a contact who has filed a spam complaint may require manual intervention and a rigorous, documented re-opt-in process, rather than a simple re-subscription, to protect all parties involved.
What email marketers say
9 marketer opinions
Even if a subscriber re-subscribes, Email Service Providers (ESPs) typically maintain the suppression of an email address after a spam complaint. This is because ESPs treat a spam complaint as a definitive 'no consent' signal, a highly critical flag that overrides subsequent re-subscription attempts. Their primary objective is to safeguard the sender's reputation and protect their own platform's infrastructure and shared IP addresses from being perceived as a source of unwanted mail. The initial complaint triggers an internal 'blacklist' or 'poisoning' of the address, a permanent block designed to prevent further damage to deliverability and uphold the integrity of the email ecosystem.
Key opinions
- Definitive No Consent: Spam complaints are interpreted by Email Service Providers (ESPs) as a clear and definitive withdrawal of consent, a signal that overrides any subsequent re-subscription attempts.
- Internal Suppression Logic: ESPs employ internal logic that places complaining addresses on a permanent 'blacklisted' or 'poisoned' suppression list for the specific sender, preventing future mailings.
- Re-subscription Overridden: A re-subscription attempt does not typically override the severe negative signal of a spam complaint, as the ESP prioritizes protecting its network and the sender's reputation.
- Infrastructure Protection: A core reason for suppressing complained-about addresses is to protect the ESP's own infrastructure, shared IP addresses, and overall deliverability for all their clients.
- Silent Suppression Common: It is common for ESPs to suppress addresses without providing error codes or bounce messages, leading to emails being 'silently dropped' after a spam complaint is registered.
Key considerations
- Acknowledge Complaint Severity: Understand that a spam complaint is a critically severe signal that often results in permanent suppression, effectively 'poisoning' an address for that sender within the ESP's system.
- Trust ESP Suppression Logic: Trust that your ESP's system is designed to handle spam complaints by suppressing addresses, even if it means re-subscriptions are ignored, as this protects your sender reputation and their shared infrastructure.
- Prioritize ESP for Silent Drops: If emails appear to be 'silently dropped' without error codes, make your ESP the first point of contact for troubleshooting, as the suppression likely originates from their internal systems.
- Re-Subscription Does Not Reset: Do not expect a re-subscription attempt to automatically reverse a spam complaint suppression; the initial negative signal holds greater weight and is prioritized in ESP systems.
- Maintain Strict Consent: Reinforce the importance of strong initial consent and continuous list hygiene to minimize spam complaints, as they are difficult to reverse once registered and impact deliverability.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that if a subscriber hits the 'This is Spam' (TiS) button, it sends an scomp (spam complaint) which likely causes the Email Service Provider (ESP) to suppress the address. While AOL may occasionally drop mail silently, investigating the ESP's suppression policies first is crucial.
8 Feb 2025 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shares that sometimes a phenomenon called 'silently dropped email' appears, where messages are not bounced or delivered to the spam folder, especially after a spam complaint. It makes sense to assume that after a spam complaint, those mails could be dropped, so it's important to double-check whether the email is actually sent from the provider first.
30 Mar 2023 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
Even after a subscriber attempts to re-subscribe, Email Service Providers (ESPs) consistently suppress addresses that have previously generated a spam complaint. This strict policy is a fundamental defense mechanism, designed to shield the ESP's infrastructure and the sender's reputation from the negative repercussions of continued unwanted mail. A spam complaint is treated as an unequivocal 'do not mail' directive, triggering a permanent suppression that overrides any subsequent attempts to rejoin a mailing list.
Key opinions
- Permanent Suppression: Once an email address generates a spam complaint, typically via an ISP feedback loop, Email Service Providers (ESPs) add it to a permanent suppression list for that sender.
- Complaint Overrides Re-subscription: A spam complaint serves as a definitive 'do not mail' signal, and ESPs prioritize this instruction, overriding any subsequent attempts by the subscriber to re-subscribe.
- ESPs' Defensive Stance: ESPs adopt a defensive posture by enforcing permanent suppression to safeguard their own IP reputation and shared email infrastructure from being negatively impacted by unwanted mail.
- Preventing List Abuse: This suppression mechanism protects against senders, whether intentionally or unintentionally, re-uploading or attempting to mail to addresses that have previously complained or opted out.
- Deliverability Preservation: By preventing repeat complaints from suppressed addresses, ESPs actively work to preserve and enhance the overall deliverability of emails for both their clients and the platform as a whole.
Key considerations
- Complaint's Finality: Understand that a spam complaint is treated as a definitive and often irreversible 'do not mail' instruction by ESPs, making subsequent re-subscriptions ineffective for that address.
- ESPs Prioritize Reputation: Trust that your ESP's suppression mechanisms, even when they block a re-subscription, are designed to protect their and your sender reputation, which is paramount for deliverability.
- No Bypassing Suppression: Avoid any attempts to circumvent ESP suppression lists by manually re-adding or re-uploading addresses that have generated spam complaints; such actions can severely damage your sender standing.
- Proactive Prevention is Key: Implement strong consent practices and consistent list hygiene to prevent spam complaints from occurring in the first place, as they lead to difficult-to-reverse suppression.
- Internal Do-Not-Mail Lists: Recognize that ESPs maintain robust internal 'do not mail' lists for addresses with spam complaints, ensuring they are not mailed again by any customer, regardless of re-subscription attempts.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that most Email Service Providers (ESPs) will not allow resubscription after a 'This is Spam' (TiS) hit, as a defensive measure to protect themselves. ESPs act defensively to prevent both bad and naive players from attempting to increase subscriber data by re-uploading addresses that have opted out, bounced, or been removed due to TiS hits. Many ESPs pre-emptively maintain 'do not mail' lists for such addresses, stopping customers from mailing to them regardless of how many times the address is re-added.
25 Jul 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that when a subscriber marks an email as spam, the Internet Service Provider (ISP) notifies the Email Service Provider (ESP) through a feedback loop (FBL). ESPs typically add these complaining addresses to a permanent suppression list to protect their IP reputation and prevent further complaints. This suppression is often treated as a "do not mail" signal, meaning that even if the user subsequently re-subscribes, the ESP will likely keep the address suppressed to avoid repeat complaints, which would negatively impact the sender's and the ESP's overall deliverability.
9 Jul 2022 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
6 technical articles
Email Service Providers (ESPs) universally suppress email addresses after a user marks a message as spam, a crucial action that persists even when the subscriber attempts to rejoin a mailing list. This stringent measure is primarily a defensive strategy to protect the sender's reputation, maintain the integrity of shared IP addresses, and ensure compliance with anti-spam regulations. The initial spam complaint is treated as a definitive and often permanent 'do not mail' instruction, overriding any subsequent re-subscription attempts and preventing any further communication to that specific address.
Key findings
- Automatic Suppression: Email Service Providers (ESPs) automatically place a subscriber who marks an email as spam onto a suppression list, often termed 'cleaned,' 'do not mail,' or 'spam complained' status.
- Re-subscription Blocked: Even if the subscriber attempts to re-subscribe, ESP systems typically block or disregard these efforts, prioritizing the initial spam complaint as a definitive negative signal.
- Permanent Action: The suppression action is generally permanent for the specific sender, treating the spam complaint as an irreversible signal that future emails are unwelcome.
- Reputation Protection: A primary reason for this strict policy is to protect the sender's reputation and the ESP's own shared IP addresses from being flagged by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) as sources of unwanted mail.
- Compliance and Integrity: ESPs enforce this to ensure compliance with anti-spam laws and to maintain the integrity and deliverability of their email platforms for all users.
- Industry Standard Practice: Major ESPs like Mailchimp, SendGrid, HubSpot, Constant Contact, ActiveCampaign, and AWeber all adhere to this policy, indicating it is an industry-wide standard for handling spam complaints.
Key considerations
- Respect Suppression Status: Always respect the suppression status applied by your Email Service Provider (ESP) following a spam complaint, as attempts to bypass it can severely damage your sender reputation.
- Spam Complaints Are Final: Understand that a spam complaint is treated as a definitive 'do not mail' instruction by ESPs, making the suppression largely permanent and overriding subsequent re-subscription attempts.
- Prioritize Deliverability: Recognize that your ESP's rigorous suppression policy for spam complaints is a critical measure to protect your deliverability, their shared IP addresses, and the overall health of the email ecosystem.
- Focus on Prevention: Implement robust consent practices and regular list hygiene to minimize spam complaints, as they are a strong negative signal that leads to irreversible suppression for that contact.
- Manual Intervention for Reactivation: Be aware that reactivating a contact who has filed a spam complaint may require a complex manual re-opt-in process, if even possible, rather than a simple re-subscription, depending on the ESP.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp Knowledge Base explains that when a subscriber marks an email as spam, they are automatically unsubscribed and placed on a 'cleaned' status, which prevents further emails from being sent. Even if they try to re-subscribe, Mailchimp's system will generally block it to protect the sender's reputation and ensure compliance with anti-spam laws, as a spam complaint is a strong signal of unwanted communication.
19 Aug 2021 - Mailchimp Knowledge Base
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid Docs states that if a recipient marks an email as spam, they are immediately added to the account's spam report suppression list. This action is permanent and prevents any future emails from being sent to that address, even if they attempt to re-subscribe. SendGrid implements this to safeguard the sender's reputation and ensure the integrity of their shared IP addresses by strictly honoring spam complaints.
16 Nov 2021 - SendGrid Docs
Can spam filters trigger email unsubscribes and how to prevent it?
Should email spam complaints be suppressed across multiple ESPs?
What causes emails to go to spam when migrating to a new ESP and warming an IP?
What do ESPs do when a subscriber marks an email as spam?
What happens when a user re-subscribes after unsubscribing from an email list?
Why am I getting repeated re-engagement emails after unsubscribing?
