Summary
Re-engaging inactive email subscribers is a delicate but often necessary task that, if mishandled, can severely damage email deliverability. Experts universally advise a cautious, data-driven approach centered on careful segmentation and rigorous list hygiene. The core strategy involves isolating inactive segments, validating their addresses, and then running targeted, value-driven re-engagement campaigns with a limited number of attempts. Crucially, a clear plan for removing or suppressing subscribers who do not respond to these efforts is essential. This proactive management of your email list protects your sender reputation, which is paramount for ensuring your emails consistently reach the inbox and contribute positively to your business objectives.
Key findings
- Impact on Sender Reputation: Sending to inactive or unengaged subscribers significantly harms sender reputation. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) interpret low engagement, high bounce rates, and increased spam complaints as signals of low-quality or unwanted mail, leading to worse deliverability for all your emails.
- Deliverability Affects Bottom Line: Poor deliverability, even if not immediately apparent, directly impacts your marketing effectiveness and ultimately your bottom line. Emails failing to reach the inbox translate to lost opportunities and reduced ROI.
- Re-engagement Potential: Re-engagement campaigns can be effective in reactivating a portion of inactive subscribers, but they require careful execution and a strategic approach to avoid damaging deliverability.
- Importance of List Hygiene: Maintaining a clean and engaged email list is paramount for strong deliverability. Regularly identifying and removing inactive subscribers, even after re-engagement attempts, is a critical component of good list hygiene.
- ISP Engagement Metrics: ISPs, including Google and Microsoft, heavily rely on user engagement metrics to assess sender reputation. Low opens, deletes without opening, and spam complaints from inactive users negatively influence this assessment, increasing the likelihood of emails landing in spam folders.
Key considerations
- Define Inactivity Clearly: Before any re-engagement efforts, establish a clear definition of 'inactive' based on lack of opens or clicks, typically within a 6-12 month timeframe, to accurately segment your audience.
- Segment Inactive Subscribers: Isolate inactive subscribers into a separate segment or high-risk group. This allows for targeted campaigns and careful monitoring of their impact on your overall deliverability without affecting your engaged audience.
- Validate Email Lists: Run the inactive list through an email validation service. This step helps identify and remove invalid or problematic addresses, reducing bounces and spam traps that can damage sender reputation.
- Test Small Batches: When re-engaging, begin by sending a small batch, such as a random 5% segment of the inactive list. Monitor deliverability, open rates, and other engagement metrics closely before rolling out to larger portions.
- Craft Value-Driven Re-engagement Campaigns: Design targeted re-engagement campaigns that acknowledge inactivity, offer compelling value, and provide clear options to update preferences or opt-out. Focus on content or offers that previously resonated with this segment, or new incentives to pique their interest.
- Limit Re-engagement Attempts: Execute a limited series of re-engagement emails, typically 1-3 messages. Continuing to send beyond this without a response is unlikely to yield results and increases the risk of negative deliverability impact.
- Provide Easy Opt-Out: Always include a clear and easy way for subscribers to opt-out or update their preferences within re-engagement emails. This minimizes frustration and reduces the likelihood of spam complaints.
- Document and Monitor Performance: Maintain thorough documentation of all re-engagement efforts, including campaign specifics, send dates, and performance metrics like open rates, click rates, bounce rates, and spam complaints. Take daily snapshots to quickly identify any decline in deliverability once inactive segments are reintroduced.
- Prioritize Removal of Non-Responders: Be prepared to remove or suppress inactive subscribers who do not engage after your re-engagement attempts. This is crucial for maintaining a clean list and protecting your sender reputation from continued sending to unengaged addresses.
What email marketers say
10 marketer opinions
Re-engaging inactive subscribers requires a highly strategic and cautious approach to safeguard email deliverability. A foundational step involves precise list segmentation and rigorous cleaning, starting with validation services to eliminate problematic addresses. When initiating contact, deploy targeted, value-driven campaigns to small, test segments first, carefully monitoring performance metrics. It is paramount to provide clear options for subscribers to re-engage or opt-out. Crucially, if re-engagement attempts fail after a limited series of messages, swiftly removing or suppressing these unengaged contacts is non-negotiable. This proactive list hygiene is vital for maintaining a healthy sender reputation, ensuring ongoing inbox placement, and safeguarding overall email program performance.
Key opinions
- Cold List Harm: Sending to a cold, uncleaned list without a proper warming or re-engagement strategy can significantly and immediately harm your sender reputation.
- ISP Irrelevance Signal: Continuing to send emails to unengaged or inactive subscribers signals to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that your content is irrelevant, leading to lower open rates and increased spam classifications across all your campaigns.
- Hygiene Protects Reputation: Proactive and consistent list hygiene, particularly the removal of non-responders after re-engagement attempts, is crucial for protecting your sender reputation from high bounce rates and spam complaints, ensuring better inbox placement.
Key considerations
- Define and Segment Precisely: Clearly define what constitutes an 'inactive' subscriber, often based on a specific timeframe (e.g., 6-12 months without engagement), and segment these users meticulously, potentially into a 'high-risk' group, based on their last activity.
- Validate Before Contact: Before initiating any re-engagement campaign, run the identified inactive segment through an email validation service to eliminate invalid or problematic addresses, thereby reducing hard bounces and potential spam trap hits.
- Test Small Batches: When re-engaging, begin by sending to a small, random segment (e.g., 5%) of the inactive list to closely monitor initial deliverability and engagement metrics, such as open and click rates, before expanding the send volume.
- Craft Value & Clear Choices: Design re-engagement emails that acknowledge the subscriber's inactivity, offer compelling value to entice re-engagement, and prominently provide clear options to update preferences or easily opt-out, minimizing frustration and spam complaints.
- Limited Re-engagement Funnel: Implement a strategic re-engagement funnel with a limited number of value-driven messages, typically 1-3 attempts, as continued sending beyond this without a response is unlikely to yield results and can increase deliverability risks.
- Continuous Monitoring & Documentation: Maintain thorough documentation of all re-engagement efforts, including campaign specifics and daily performance snapshots, to quickly identify and address any adverse impacts on overall deliverability metrics.
- Decisive Pruning Policy: Establish and strictly adhere to a policy for suppressing or definitively removing inactive subscribers who do not respond after the allocated re-engagement attempts, as this proactive list hygiene is crucial for protecting sender reputation and improving overall campaign performance.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks stresses the importance of having a clear delineation to see where and when a decline starts if inactive subscribers must be reintegrated. He emphasizes keeping documentation and charting, highlighting that deliverability always affects the bottom line, even if it's not immediately apparent.
8 Jan 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks recommends running the inactive list through a validation service and then testing a random 5% segment to check engagement levels before adding them back.
5 Dec 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Effective management of inactive email subscribers is vital for maintaining robust email deliverability. Experts advise a precise strategy involving careful segmentation of these dormant contacts and vigilant performance monitoring, including daily snapshots. Critically, if re-engagement attempts do not yield a response, the definitive removal of these subscribers is paramount. This proactive list hygiene protects your sender reputation, as continued sending to unengaged users signals to Internet Service Providers that your mail is unwanted, severely impacting overall deliverability.
Key opinions
- Harm to Sender Reputation: Sending emails to inactive subscribers significantly harms sender reputation because Internet Service Providers (ISPs) interpret low engagement as an indication of unwanted mail, negatively impacting overall deliverability.
- Importance of Removing Inactive Users: Regularly removing subscribers who do not respond to re-engagement efforts is crucial. Continued sending to these unengaged users signals to ISPs that your emails are not desired, thereby degrading your sender reputation.
- ISPs Interpret Low Engagement as Unwanted Mail: Internet Service Providers view a lack of opens or clicks from inactive subscribers as a clear signal that the content is unwanted. This interpretation directly contributes to emails being routed to spam folders or blocked entirely.
Key considerations
- Monitor Performance Continuously: Upon re-adding inactive subscribers to your mailing stream, segment them separately and compare their performance against your engaged audience. Take daily snapshots of key metrics to promptly identify any decline in deliverability or engagement.
- Document All Efforts: Maintain thorough documentation of every step in your re-engagement process, including send dates, segmentation strategies, and performance outcomes. This data is crucial for understanding impacts and making informed decisions.
- Define Inactivity Clearly: Establish a precise definition for inactive subscribers, typically after 6-12 months of no engagement, such as opens or clicks. This consistent criterion ensures accurate segmentation for re-engagement efforts.
- Prioritize Removal of Non-Responders: If re-engagement campaigns are unsuccessful, it is vital to remove these subscribers from your active mailing list. Continued sending to unengaged users severely harms your sender reputation and deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests segmenting re-added inactive subscribers to compare their performance with engaged audiences. He advises taking daily snapshots to monitor any decline once they are added back in and notes the importance of documenting everything as there's only so much that can be done.
18 Sep 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that managing inactive subscribers is crucial for deliverability. He advises considering subscribers inactive after 6-12 months of no engagement (opens or clicks). While re-engagement campaigns can be attempted, removing those who do not respond is vital, as continued sending to unengaged users negatively impacts sender reputation and deliverability by signaling to ISPs that emails are not wanted.
18 Jul 2023 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Successfully re-engaging inactive email subscribers demands a strategic, highly disciplined approach to preserve email deliverability. A primary recommendation from leading email providers is to meticulously segment these dormant contacts, followed by cautious re-engagement campaigns. The absolute imperative, however, is the definitive removal of any subscriber who fails to respond. This rigorous list hygiene is paramount, as continued sending to unengaged audiences signals irrelevance to Internet Service Providers, thereby jeopardizing sender reputation, increasing bounce rates and spam complaints, and ultimately hindering inbox placement.
Key findings
- Sender Reputation Impact: Sending emails to inactive or unengaged subscribers significantly damages sender reputation, as this leads to increased bounce rates, higher spam complaints, and overall low engagement.
- ISP Engagement Signals: Internet Service Providers, including Google and Microsoft, heavily rely on user engagement metrics; low opens, deletes without opening, and direct spam complaints from inactive users are interpreted as signals of low-quality mail, affecting deliverability.
- List Hygiene for Deliverability: Maintaining a clean and actively engaged email list is critical for deliverability, necessitating the regular identification and removal of subscribers who remain unengaged even after re-engagement efforts.
- Avoidance of Spam Traps and Bounces: Continued sending to unvalidated or highly inactive lists increases the risk of hitting spam traps and generating excessive bounces, both of which severely harm sender reputation and inbox placement.
Key considerations
- Dedicated Inactive Segmentation: Meticulously segment inactive subscribers into distinct groups to enable highly targeted re-engagement campaigns and closely track their deliverability impact separately from your main list.
- Cautious Re-engagement Rollout: When initiating re-engagement, proceed with extreme caution, ideally starting with small, controlled batches to closely monitor engagement metrics and potential negative impacts before broader deployment.
- Non-Negotiable Removal of Unresponsive Contacts: It is absolutely critical to remove or suppress any inactive subscribers who fail to re-engage after a set number of attempts, as continued sending to them severely harms your sender reputation and overall deliverability.
- Value-Driven Re-engagement Strategy: Develop re-engagement campaigns that offer clear, compelling value to incentivize action, rather than generic messaging, to maximize the chance of a positive response and avoid being marked as unwanted.
- Proactive List Cleaning: Implement a proactive and continuous list hygiene routine that includes regularly identifying and purging inactive or unengaged subscribers, ensuring your mailing list remains healthy and performant.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp explains that sending to inactive subscribers can hurt deliverability. They recommend isolating inactive segments and sending a re-engagement campaign. Those who don't respond should be removed from the active list to maintain good sender reputation.
29 Jan 2024 - Mailchimp
Technical article
Documentation from Twilio SendGrid emphasizes that sending to unengaged users increases bounce rates and spam complaints, both detrimental to sender reputation. They recommend segmenting inactive users and attempting re-engagement campaigns cautiously, or removing them entirely if no engagement occurs, to maintain high deliverability.
22 May 2022 - Twilio SendGrid Documentation
How can managing inactive email subscribers improve Gmail deliverability?
How to re-engage inactive email subscribers and when should you stop sending?
What are best practices for deliverability when sending a first email campaign to an old list?
What are effective strategies for balancing engagement between active and inactive email audience segments?
What are the best practices for re-engaging inactive email subscribers safely?
What are the best practices for sunsetting inactive email subscribers to improve deliverability?
