Suped

How to test email deliverability using seedlists and DMARC configurations?

Summary

Effective email deliverability testing leverages two primary methods: seedlist testing and DMARC configuration analysis. Seedlists offer immediate, real-time insights into where emails land across various mailbox providers, crucial for pre-campaign checks. DMARC, through its reporting mechanisms, provides critical data on email authentication, allowing senders to monitor SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment, identify potential spoofing, and troubleshoot issues that impact deliverability. Combining both approaches offers a comprehensive view, covering both direct inbox placement and the underlying authentication health that influences long-term sender reputation and trust.

Key findings

  • Seedlist Value: Seedlists are a fundamental tool for testing email deliverability, providing real-time insights into inbox placement across diverse ISPs, showing if emails land in the inbox, spam, or promotions folders before a full campaign send. Professional seedlist services often offer detailed reports on inbox placement, spam folder delivery, and blocklisting.
  • DMARC Reporting & Authentication: DMARC reports, especially RUA (aggregate) reports, are vital for monitoring email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC alignment), helping senders identify issues, detect spoofing, and ensure legitimate emails reach the inbox. DMARC policies directly influence how recipient servers handle unauthenticated emails, with proper implementation building sender trust and improving deliverability.
  • Complementary Tools: Seedlists and DMARC reports offer complementary insights into email deliverability. Seedlists provide a direct view of inbox placement, while DMARC reports confirm authentication compliance and highlight underlying issues that could affect future campaigns, offering both proactive and reactive deliverability management strategies.

Key considerations

  • Diverse & Regular Seedlists: Utilize diverse seedlists covering various ISPs, business domains, and geographical regions. Consistent and regular testing with these seedlists is crucial to detect subtle changes in deliverability trends and react quickly to potential problems before they escalate, rather than relying on one-off checks.
  • DMARC Configuration & Reporting: When testing DMARC, begin with a 'p=none' policy to gather RUA (aggregate) reports without affecting deliverability, allowing for analysis before enforcing stricter policies. Ensure the DMARC DNS record's syntax and configuration are correct, as errors can lead to legitimate emails failing authentication. For comprehensive insights, use DMARC analyzer tools to process RUA reports and visualize trends in authentication failures, helping to fine-tune SPF and DKIM records.
  • Holistic Deliverability View: Combine seedlist testing with DMARC report analysis for a comprehensive view of deliverability. While seedlists offer real-time inbox placement, DMARC reports reveal authentication compliance and potential abuse. Remember that factors beyond these tests, such as sender reputation, content quality, and recipient engagement, also significantly influence real deliverability.

What email marketers say

10 marketer opinions

To effectively assess email deliverability, marketers employ a two-pronged strategy: leveraging seedlists for real-time inbox placement insights and analyzing DMARC configurations for authentication health. Seedlist testing offers a direct snapshot of where emails land across diverse mailbox providers, providing immediate feedback before large sends. Concurrently, DMARC's reporting capabilities are indispensable for monitoring email authentication, pinpointing potential spoofing, and diagnosing underlying issues that impact long-term sender reputation and trust. This integrated approach ensures both immediate deliverability checks and the robust foundational security necessary for consistent inboxing.

Key opinions

  • Seedlist Utility: Seedlists are fundamental for real-time inbox placement across diverse ISPs, revealing where emails land, including inbox, spam, or promotions folders. Professional seedlist services offer comprehensive reports, including blocklisting, though their results serve as initial indicators rather than the sole measure of deliverability.
  • DMARC's Deliverability Impact: DMARC reports are essential for diagnosing deliverability issues, indicating authentication compliance and helping identify problematic sending sources. Proper DMARC implementation builds sender trust, directly enhancing inbox placement by assuring recipient servers of email legitimacy.
  • Integrated Testing Benefits: Combining insights from seedlist tests and DMARC reports provides a comprehensive view of email deliverability, encompassing both real-time inbox placement and underlying authentication health. This allows for both proactive issue prevention and reactive problem-solving.

Key considerations

  • Strategic Seedlist Use: Employ diverse seedlists, including major ISPs and business domains, and consider professional services for detailed reporting. Consistent and regular testing, not just one-off checks, is vital to monitor fluctuating trends and respond promptly. Custom seedlists can provide granular insights into specific ISP or regional issues.
  • DMARC Configuration & Analysis: Test DMARC DNS configurations carefully, considering different policy options like -ALL or ~ALL, and ensure the Sender FROM domain is correctly set when using an ESP. Process DMARC RUA reports with analyzer tools to visualize authentication failures and fine-tune SPF and DKIM records.
  • Broader Deliverability Factors: While seedlists and DMARC reports are essential, remember that overall deliverability is also significantly influenced by sender reputation, email content quality, and recipient engagement. A holistic approach considering these additional elements is crucial for sustained inbox placement.

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that GlockApps provides a seedlist of 60-70 addresses covering domains like Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, and business domains, and suggests using an ESP like SendGrid for sending emails to get test results.

3 Jun 2025 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks discusses testing DMARC DNS configurations, suggesting options like -ALL (with or without DMARC p=reject) and ~ALL. They also advise setting the Sender FROM domain when using an ESP for testing.

10 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

4 expert opinions

Email deliverability can be effectively tested using seedlists and DMARC configurations. Seedlists provide direct observation of inbox placement, allowing senders to proactively identify where messages land across various providers. DMARC reports, while not a direct deliverability test, offer crucial insights into email authentication, helping to detect misconfigurations or malicious activities that impact sender reputation and inbox placement. Together, these methods offer a thorough approach to monitoring and improving email deliverability.

Key opinions

  • Seedlist Efficacy: Seedlists are fundamental for direct and proactive deliverability assessment, allowing senders to observe real-time inbox placement across diverse mailbox providers and identify potential issues, such as landing in spam or being blocked, before affecting the broader subscriber base.
  • DMARC's Indirect Role: DMARC reports provide essential feedback on email authentication outcomes, signaling if SPF and DKIM checks are passing and revealing issues, such as misconfigurations or spoofing attempts, that indirectly affect deliverability by impacting sender reputation and trust.
  • Integrated Insights: Combining seedlist observations with DMARC report analysis offers a comprehensive view of email deliverability, addressing both immediate inbox placement and underlying authentication health for a robust, multi-faceted testing strategy.

Key considerations

  • Strategic Seedlist Deployment: To maximize insights, deploy seedlists that include a diverse range of email addresses across various ISPs and mailbox providers, enabling a comprehensive view of inbox placement. Regular, consistent seed testing is vital for monitoring deliverability trends over time and proactively addressing issues.
  • Interpreting DMARC Data: Thoroughly analyze both aggregate and forensic DMARC reports to understand authentication outcomes, identify patterns of failure, and pinpoint misconfigurations or unauthorized email activity that could degrade sender reputation and inbox placement. This analysis helps refine SPF and DKIM records for better alignment.
  • Comprehensive Deliverability Strategy: Recognize that while seedlists and DMARC are powerful testing tools, overall email deliverability also depends on other crucial factors like sender reputation, content quality, and recipient engagement. Employing these tools as part of a broader, integrated strategy is essential for sustained inbox placement.

Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that seedlists are a fundamental tool for email deliverability monitoring. By sending emails to a diverse set of seed email addresses across various mailbox providers, senders can observe where their messages land-inbox, spam folder, or blocked-providing critical insights into inbox placement and overall deliverability performance.

9 Mar 2023 - Spam Resource

Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource shares that DMARC is crucial for email authentication, and its reporting mechanism provides valuable feedback on authentication outcomes. While not a direct deliverability test like a seedlist, DMARC reports (aggregate and forensic) indicate if emails are passing SPF and DKIM checks and if policies are being enforced, which indirectly serves as a testing mechanism by highlighting issues that can negatively impact deliverability.

16 Jan 2025 - Spam Resource

What the documentation says

6 technical articles

To assess email deliverability, particularly concerning authentication, DMARC configurations and their resulting reports are indispensable. While seedlists offer real-time inbox placement views, DMARC reports provide a deeper insight into the foundational health of your email sending. Aggregate (RUA) reports are crucial for daily monitoring of SPF and DKIM alignment, helping identify authentication failures and potential spoofing attempts. The choice of DMARC policy directly dictates how unauthenticated emails are handled, with an initial 'p=none' policy recommended for data gathering before enforcing stricter actions. Ultimately, precise DMARC DNS configuration is vital, as errors can severely impact deliverability by causing legitimate emails to fail authentication checks.

Key findings

  • DMARC RUA Value: DMARC aggregate (RUA) reports are crucial for monitoring email authentication, providing daily summaries of SPF and DKIM pass/fail rates and DMARC alignment. Analyzing these reports helps senders identify authentication issues, detect spoofing, and ensure legitimate emails reach the inbox.
  • Policy Influence: DMARC policies, such as 'p=none', 'p=quarantine', and 'p=reject', directly influence how recipient servers handle emails that fail authentication. Starting with 'p=none' is vital for gathering reports and analyzing issues without initially impacting deliverability.
  • Configuration Accuracy: The correct syntax and configuration of a DMARC DNS record are paramount for effective email deliverability. Errors in the record can cause even legitimate emails to fail DMARC authentication, leading to their rejection or quarantine by recipient mail servers.
  • Forensic Reports: DMARC forensic (RUF) reports offer detailed, anonymized copies of individual emails that failed authentication. While less common due to privacy concerns, they provide granular insights into specific email characteristics and headers, aiding in precise troubleshooting for deliverability issues.

Key considerations

  • RUA Report Analysis: Regularly analyze DMARC aggregate (RUA) reports to diagnose issues with SPF and DKIM alignment, identify sources of legitimate and fraudulent emails, and troubleshoot authentication failures that can impact deliverability. These daily XML files provide a comprehensive overview of your email streams.
  • Policy Implementation Strategy: Begin DMARC implementation with a 'p=none' policy. This allows you to collect DMARC reports without affecting email deliverability, providing essential data to analyze issues before enforcing stricter policies like 'p=quarantine' or 'p=reject' that prevent unauthenticated emails from reaching the inbox.
  • DNS Record Precision: Ensure the DMARC DNS record's syntax and configuration are meticulously correct. Incorrect tags or values can lead to legitimate emails failing DMARC authentication, resulting in them being quarantined or rejected by recipient servers, thereby harming your deliverability.
  • Interpreting DMARC Outcomes: Familiarize yourself with how to interpret DMARC reports, including within specific environments like Microsoft 365. Understanding these outcomes helps administrators pinpoint non-compliant sending sources, detect potential phishing, and ensure legitimate emails consistently align with SPF and DKIM for reliable inbox placement.

Technical article

Documentation from Google Workspace Admin Help explains that DMARC reports, specifically RUA (aggregate) reports, are vital for monitoring email deliverability. By analyzing these reports, senders can identify issues with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment, which helps in diagnosing deliverability problems, detecting spoofing, and ensuring legitimate emails reach the inbox.

14 Aug 2024 - Google Workspace Admin Help

Technical article

Documentation from M3AAWG explains that DMARC policies (p=none, p=quarantine, p=reject) directly influence how recipient servers handle emails that fail DMARC authentication. Starting with 'p=none' allows senders to gather DMARC reports without affecting deliverability, enabling them to analyze issues before enforcing stricter policies that prevent unauthenticated emails from reaching the inbox.

24 Sep 2024 - M3AAWG

Start improving your email deliverability today

Sign up