SpamAssassin hexadecimal sequence errors, often indicated by rules like URI_HEX or FROM_LOCAL_HEX, occur when email links or 'From' addresses contain hexadecimal encoding. This is primarily because spammers frequently use such sequences to obfuscate content or bypass filters, making them a red flag for deliverability. Resolving these errors involves ensuring that URLs are clean, canonical, and use minimal, standard encoding. For 'From' addresses, the solution is to ensure they are plain, unencoded, and conform to standard email address formatting. Senders should inspect their raw email content, correct any unnecessary hex sequences, and review their email sending software configurations to prevent future occurrences, as adhering to clear and standards-compliant email formatting is crucial for maintaining sender trust and deliverability.
10 marketer opinions
Addressing SpamAssassin hexadecimal sequence errors in email links and 'From' addresses is critical for strong email deliverability. These flags frequently arise when URLs contain excessive or unusual hexadecimal encoding, or when 'From' addresses are malformed with such sequences. To effectively resolve these issues, email marketers should prioritize adherence to clean URL practices, ensuring links are canonical and use minimal, standard encoding, for example, by substituting '%20' with '+' for spaces where appropriate. For 'From' addresses, the solution is straightforward: ensure they are presented in a plain, unencoded, and valid format. Careful inspection of the email's raw source, coupled with adjustments to sending software or CMS plugins, helps correct these problematic sequences and ensures content appears legitimate to spam filters.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that the SpamAssassin rule 'URI_HEX', which describes a URI hostname having a long hexadecimal sequence, might be the cause of the error. He provides a regular expression, `https?://[^/?]*\b[0-9a-f]{6,}`, to search for such sequences within an email using a text editor like Sublime Text.
25 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Stack Overflow explains that if legitimate URLs contain hexadecimal sequences, for instance %20 for spaces, it's often better to URL-encode spaces as '+' or decode them programmatically where possible. For 'From' addresses, the solution is to ensure no hex encoding is present as it's typically a sign of a malformed or suspicious header.
15 Feb 2022 - Stack Overflow
1 expert opinions
SpamAssassin flags hexadecimal sequences in email links, particularly in hostnames, and 'From' addresses, as these are often utilized by spammers to obfuscate content or identify spamtraps. The 'FROM_LOCAL_HEX' rule specifically points to issues with the 'From' address. Resolving these errors requires removing any hexadecimal encoding from the 'From' address, replacing it with a clean, standard email address. This fix may involve adjusting mail server configurations, not just email templates. While it's best practice to address such issues, a minimal increase in SpamAssassin score, like 1.3 points, might sometimes be acceptable.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that a spam rate check error regarding hexadecimal sequences means the checker dislikes a domain name or a 'From' address because spammers often encode things in hostnames or 'From' addresses to identify spamtraps. This error is specific to the format of a link or the 'From' address, not elements like embedded tables. She identifies the error as a SpamAssassin rule, potentially 'FROM_LOCAL_HEX', which indicates a problem with the 'From' address. To fix it, remove any hexadecimal sequences from the 'From' address and replace it with an actual email address, noting that this might be a mail server configuration rather than a template issue. She also advises that a low score (e.g., 1.3) might be ignorable.
18 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks
6 technical articles
Email deliverability often hinges on adhering to strict formatting standards, and SpamAssassin's flags for hexadecimal sequences, particularly in email links and 'From' addresses, highlight a common pitfall. These warnings, triggered by rules like URI_HEX or HEX_IN_URL, arise because such encoding is frequently exploited by spammers to hide malicious content or bypass filters, making them suspicious. To resolve these issues, senders must ensure that all URLs are constructed cleanly, using minimal and standard encoding only when strictly necessary, rather than for general characters. Crucially, 'From' addresses should always be plain, unencoded email addresses that fully comply with email formatting specifications. The responsibility lies with the sender to adopt clean email practices and verify that their sending platforms or mail servers correctly format headers and links, aligning with established internet standards to maintain sender reputation and ensure messages reach the inbox.
Technical article
Documentation from SpamAssassin Wiki explains that SpamAssassin rules like URI_HEX, HEX_IN_URL, HEX_IN_URI_FROM, and HEX_IN_URI_EMAIL trigger when hexadecimal sequences (like %20 for space) are present in URIs or email addresses. These are flagged because spammers frequently use such encoding to obfuscate links or bypass filters, making them suspicious.
1 Aug 2021 - SpamAssassin Wiki
Technical article
Documentation from Apache SpamAssassin explains that rules detecting hexadecimal escapes within URIs or email addresses, such as '%xx', are designed to catch obfuscation techniques used by spammers. To resolve this, legitimate content must ensure that URLs are properly constructed without unnecessary hex sequences and that email addresses in the 'From' header are plain and unencoded.
16 Apr 2022 - Apache SpamAssassin Documentation
How can I resolve email delivery errors due to tempfail and suspected spam?
How do spamassassin rules affect email deliverability?
How to fix compauth failure in email headers due to domain alignment issues?
How to identify and resolve MIME encoding issues in List-Unsubscribe headers?
How to troubleshoot email delivery issues related to RFC compliance errors?
What causes the 'error message' when accessing links in emails and how can it be resolved?