Summary
The use of email open rates as a primary metric for email marketing campaigns has become increasingly complex, especially with privacy changes and the evolving nature of inbox providers. While once considered a direct indicator of engagement, opens alone can be misleading and, if relied upon exclusively, can lead to poor deliverability and negative sender reputation. Understanding the nuances of how opens are tracked and their limitations is crucial for marketers aiming to build healthy subscriber lists and ensure their emails reach the inbox.
Key findings
- Misleading metric: Relying solely on open rates without considering other engagement signals, like complaints via Feedback Loops (FBLs), can lead to continuing to mail recipients who do not want the messages, potentially increasing spam folder placement.
- FBLs are critical: Without FBLs, marketers cannot identify when an open might have immediately preceded a 'this is spam' action, which can significantly harm sender reputation. Ensuring you're signed up for FBLs, like those provided by Yahoo (now part of Oath), is essential.
- Google's impact: Google's privacy measures, which preload images, make open rates less reliable. This means some 'opens' may not reflect actual recipient engagement. This highlights why accurately measuring open rates is challenging.
- Spam trap interactions: While rare, some spam traps can interact with messages by loading images, artificially inflating open metrics. If this occurs, it indicates significant underlying deliverability problems. More on this can be found in our guide on spam traps.
- Holistic view: Open rates are just one component of a broader set of metrics. A good email marketing strategy should analyze various engagement signals to form a comprehensive understanding of campaign performance. Campaign Monitor provides insight into various email metrics.
Key considerations
- Beyond a single metric: Never rely on a single metric for success; email marketing performance should be evaluated through a combination of open rates, click-through rates, conversion rates, and complaint rates.
- Clicks are stronger: Clicks often provide a more reliable signal of intent, especially if they lead to conversions or other positive on-site actions. However, even clicks can be misleading if they stem from frustrated attempts to unsubscribe before marking as spam.
- Segment by engagement: Use engagement metrics to segment lists. Instead of just a single open, consider patterns like multiple opens or clicks over a period as indicators of an engaged recipient.
- Identify negative interactions: Ensure processes are in place to remove contacts who indicate negative intent (e.g., spam complaints), even if they initially opened or clicked.
- Privacy impact: Be aware of how privacy features, like Apple's Mail Privacy Protection, affect open rate accuracy. Adapt your measurement strategies to account for these changes.
What email marketers say
Email marketers generally agree that while open rates offer some insight, their reliability has diminished, particularly with recent privacy updates and evolving ISP behaviors. The consensus is that opens should not be used in isolation, and a holistic view incorporating other metrics, especially clicks and complaints, is essential for accurate performance assessment and maintaining good sender reputation. There's a strong emphasis on understanding the intent behind an 'open' and the potential for it to be a negative signal.
Key opinions
- Incomplete picture: Marketers frequently express that open rates provide an incomplete or even misleading picture of engagement without the context of FBLs or other feedback mechanisms. Ignoring negative feedback can lead to sending more mail to unwanted recipients.
- Clicks are superior: Many marketers prioritize click-through rates over open rates as a stronger indicator of recipient intent and interest. A click (especially one leading to a positive action) signifies a more deliberate interaction.
- Beware of 'negative' opens: An open can sometimes precede a spam complaint, meaning the recipient opened the email specifically to report it. Continuing to mail such recipients actively harms deliverability.
- Google's unique challenge: The way Google handles image loading (pre-fetching) often inflates open rates, making them less reliable for audience segmentation and engagement measurement for Gmail users. More information on Gmail's impact on open rates is available.
- Context is key: Open rates can still be valuable for A/B testing subject lines and comparing overall campaign trends, but only when interpreted within a broader context of other metrics and deliverability data. Shopify discusses other email marketing metrics worth tracking.
Key considerations
- Multi-metric approach: Adopt a comprehensive approach to email analytics, integrating open rates with click-through rates, conversion rates, and unsubscribe/complaint data to paint a more accurate picture of engagement.
- Segment by true engagement: When defining engaged segments for ongoing mailing, look for patterns of multiple opens or clicks over a consistent period, rather than a single recent open. This helps to truly identify good email engagement thresholds.
- Address spam complaints: Proactively remove recipients who mark emails as spam, regardless of whether they initially opened or clicked. This protects sender reputation and prevents further unwanted mail.
- Optimize subject lines carefully: While open rates can gauge subject line effectiveness, ensure that compelling subject lines don't merely trick recipients into opening, only for them to complain immediately after.
- Leverage analytics tools: Utilize robust email marketing and deliverability platforms that offer in-depth analytics beyond basic open rates to gain actionable insights into recipient behavior.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that relying on any single metric to measure success is inherently flawed. A holistic view is always needed to understand campaign performance accurately, as individual data points rarely tell the full story. This perspective emphasizes the complexity of email engagement.
Marketer view
Marketer from Campaign Monitor states that a healthy email open rate typically falls between 17-28%, though this can vary significantly by industry. This benchmark provides a valuable starting point for marketers to evaluate their campaign's initial performance, but it's important not to see it as the sole indicator of success. The context of the industry and audience is paramount.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight that the traditional reliance on open rates has become problematic due to technological advancements (like image caching and pre-fetching) and evolving privacy standards. They caution against using open rates as a sole indicator of engagement or inbox placement, emphasizing the need for more sophisticated analysis that considers true user interaction, complaint data, and a broader array of engagement metrics. Experts stress that a superficial understanding of opens can lead to detrimental deliverability consequences, including increased spam folder placement and reputation damage.
Key opinions
- Declining accuracy: Experts universally agree that the accuracy of open rates has significantly declined, particularly following Apple's Mail Privacy Protection and similar measures from other ISPs. These changes often inflate reported opens, making them unreliable for true engagement assessment.
- Emphasis on clicks and conversions: Many experts now advocate for a stronger focus on click-through rates and conversion metrics as more reliable indicators of engagement and campaign success, as these typically represent more intentional recipient actions. Learn more about increasing email click-through rate.
- Engagement signals: True engagement is a combination of positive actions (clicks, replies, forwards) and the absence of negative ones (spam complaints, unsubscribes). Open rates are merely one signal, and an increasingly ambiguous one.
- Holistic deliverability view: Deliverability experts often refer to a broader suite of metrics, including bounce rates, complaint rates, and FBL data, to accurately gauge sender reputation and inbox placement. Microsoft's blog discusses rethinking email marketing metrics.
- Risk of misinterpretation: Misinterpreting high open rates (especially inflated ones) can lead senders to continue emailing disengaged or irritated recipients, which over time damages sender reputation and leads to more mail going to spam or being blocked.
Key considerations
- FBL integration: Integrate Feedback Loops into your email platform to receive real-time notifications of spam complaints and immediately remove those recipients from your list. This is vital, regardless of open behavior.
- Monitor spam rates: Pay close attention to spam complaint rates through Google Postmaster Tools and other similar services. High complaint rates are a strong negative signal, irrespective of open rates. This is key to fixing emails going to spam.
- Engagement segmentation: Segment your audience based on actual clicks, conversions, and recent interactions rather than ambiguous opens. This ensures you're sending to genuinely interested recipients, improving email engagement's impact on deliverability.
- Sender reputation focus: Prioritize maintaining a strong sender reputation through consistent positive engagement and list hygiene. Open rates alone do not accurately reflect reputation or predict future deliverability.
- A/B testing limitations: While open rates can still be used for A/B testing subject lines, acknowledge the inherent inaccuracies. Consider using click-through rates as a more robust metric for subject line performance testing, especially with the rise of privacy features.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that a crucial deliverability principle is that a high open rate, without corresponding FBL data, can paradoxically indicate a growing problem. If recipients are opening emails but also hitting the spam button, it signals disengagement that is masked by the open metric, leading to long-term reputation damage. This highlights the need for a balanced view of engagement.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource.com states that the value of open rates as a reliable metric has been significantly undermined by various factors, including caching by ISPs and Apple's Mail Privacy Protection. These mechanisms pre-fetch images, triggering an 'open' without actual recipient interaction. This makes it challenging for marketers to distinguish genuine engagement from automated activity, pushing them to seek alternative metrics.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and academic sources recognize email open rates as a traditional metric for assessing initial email engagement. However, they increasingly highlight the challenges to its accuracy posed by modern email clients, privacy enhancements, and automated systems. While providing a baseline understanding of message visibility, documentation often advises against its singular reliance, urging a move towards comprehensive engagement analysis that accounts for real user interaction and deliverability factors beyond simple image loading.
Key findings
- Definition: Documentation defines open rate as the percentage of recipients who opened an email, typically tracked via a small, invisible image pixel loaded when the email is viewed. This traditional definition underpins its historical significance.
- Accuracy limitations: Many sources acknowledge that open rate accuracy is compromised by factors like image blocking, preview panes, and privacy features (e.g., Apple Mail Privacy Protection), which can artificially inflate or suppress reported opens. This makes understanding open rate metrics even more critical.
- Contextual importance: Documentation often advises using open rates in specific contexts, such as A/B testing subject lines or observing general trends over time, rather than as a definitive measure of individual engagement or content success.
- Deliverability signal: A low open rate can sometimes indicate deliverability issues (e.g., messages going to spam folders), making it a diagnostic tool for inbox placement problems rather than solely a marketing performance metric.
- Evolving landscape: Official blogs and resources from major platforms emphasize that marketers need to adapt to a landscape where open rates are less reliable, urging a shift to metrics like clicks, conversions, and direct feedback. Benchmark Email's blog discusses why email open rates still matter, but with caveats.
Key considerations
- Diversify metrics: Consult technical documentation that recommends looking at a broader set of metrics including click-through rates (CTR), click-to-open rates (CTOR), conversion rates, and unsubscribe rates for a holistic view of campaign performance. This helps with diagnosing and improving open rates.
- Understand tracking methods: Familiarize yourself with how email open tracking works (e.g., pixel loading) and its inherent limitations to avoid misinterpretations. This includes understanding the impact of various email client behaviors.
- Focus on explicit engagement: Documentation increasingly promotes explicit engagement (e.g., clicks on links, form submissions, replies) as stronger indicators of recipient interest and value, as these are less susceptible to false positives than opens.
- Adapt reporting: Adjust internal reporting and key performance indicators (KPIs) to reflect the reduced reliability of open rates, placing more emphasis on metrics that directly correlate with business objectives and deliverability health.
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog highlights that open rates are becoming less reliable due to challenges posed by modern email clients, such as image caching and privacy features. These technical shifts necessitate a rethinking of how email marketers measure performance, moving beyond the simple open count to more robust engagement signals. The blog emphasizes that continued reliance on outdated metrics can lead to misguided optimization efforts.
Technical article
Documentation from iPost defines an email open rate as a key metric that measures how many times a recipient opens an email. While fundamental, they note that its interpretation has grown complex due to automated pre-fetching of images by certain email clients, which can inflate open numbers without true recipient interaction. This means the metric indicates message visibility more than engagement.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
How to accurately measure email open rates without relying on image pixels or clicks?
How to identify artificial email opens and clicks generated by spam filters?
How do Internet Service Providers track email engagement and its impact on deliverability?
How to improve low Gmail email open rates?
What are good email engagement thresholds for deliverability monitoring?
How to diagnose and improve email deliverability and open rates?
Which open rate metric, UOR or TOR, is best for email deliverability assessment?
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
How to Increase Email Click Through Rate [Step By Step Guide]
Spam traps: what they are and how they work
