When your email address or domain is used by spammers without your permission, it is a frustrating and potentially damaging experience. This practice, known as email spoofing, makes it appear as if unsolicited emails are originating from your legitimate address, leading to confusion among recipients and potential damage to your sender reputation. While completely stopping all spoofing attempts can be challenging due to the nature of email protocols, there are significant steps you can take to mitigate the impact and protect your domain.
Key findings
Email spoofing: Spammers often forge the 'From' address to make emails look like they come from a trusted source, even if they aren't sent from your server. This is distinct from your account being hacked.
Authentication protocols: Implementing email authentication standards like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is the most effective way to combat unauthorized use of your domain.
DMARC policies: A DMARC policy set to p=quarantine or p=reject instructs recipient servers on how to handle emails that fail authentication, significantly reducing spam delivered using your domain.
Reputation impact: Even if not sent from your infrastructure, spoofed emails can still lead to your domain being reported as spam, potentially landing your legitimate emails on a blacklist.
Key considerations
Verify email origins: Always check full email headers to determine if the spam actually originated from your servers or if it's a spoofing attempt. This is critical for diagnosing the issue.
Password security: If emails are indeed coming from your infrastructure, immediately change passwords for affected accounts and implement two-factor authentication.
Customer service response: Prepare a clear, concise response for customers who report receiving spoofed emails, explaining it's not from your legitimate operations. Webcentral offers advice on dealing with email appearing to send spam.
Monitor DMARC reports: Even with a p=none policy, DMARC reports can provide valuable insights into who is using your domain and where the spoofed emails are originating.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face the challenge of their domain or email address being used for spam, which can severely impact their legitimate campaigns. Their perspectives highlight the dual challenge of protecting their brand's reputation while ensuring their own emails reach the inbox. They emphasize proactive measures and clear communication with affected recipients.
Key opinions
Proactive protection: Many marketers believe that implementing robust email authentication is paramount to safeguarding their domain from unauthorized use. It's not just about compliance but also about active defense.
Brand integrity: The appearance of spam from their domain erodes trust and damages their brand image, making it harder for legitimate emails to be recognized and opened.
Recipient communication: Marketers frequently suggest having a standardized message ready for recipients who report receiving spoofed emails, assuring them that the emails are not legitimate and that action is being taken.
Monitoring is key: Even if they can't stop every spoof, monitoring DMARC reports helps them understand the scale and nature of the abuse, allowing them to adjust their strategy.
Key considerations
Impact on campaigns: Spoofing can lead to increased spam complaints and reduced deliverability rates for their legitimate marketing emails.
Damage control: Prioritizing remediation steps, such as escalating DMARC policies and communicating with affected parties, is crucial for reputation repair. Learn more about getting less spam in your inbox.
Internal education: Ensuring that internal teams, especially customer support, understand email spoofing helps them respond effectively to inquiries without confirming active email addresses to spammers.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that they are experiencing spam issues where their sender email address is being used for unsolicited emails, leading to complaints from non-customers.
1 Jan 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Ask Leo! suggests that email spoofing is widespread, and there is often little that can be done directly to prevent spammers from sending emails that appear to originate from your address.
18 Nov 2018 - Ask Leo!
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and security provide critical technical advice on how to combat email spoofing. They emphasize the importance of robust authentication protocols and the practical challenges of implementation and monitoring. Their insights often focus on long-term solutions and understanding the underlying mechanisms of email abuse.
Key opinions
DMARC is crucial: Implementing DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) is consistently cited as the primary defense against domain spoofing.
Policy enforcement: For DMARC to be effective in stopping spam, it must be configured with a policy of quarantine or reject, not none.
SPF alignment: Ensuring your SPF record contains -all rather than ~all (fail instead of softfail) for unauthorized senders is a stronger defense.
Full header analysis: To correctly identify the source of spoofed emails, experts stress the necessity of reviewing the full email headers, as forwarded emails may obscure original sender information.
Key considerations
Implementation complexity: While DMARC is powerful, its implementation can be complex and requires careful planning to avoid blocking legitimate emails. Guidance on safely transitioning DMARC policies is available.
Short-term versus long-term: Some experts note that spoofing might be a temporary issue that fades, suggesting that a full DMARC rollout might be disproportionate for very short-term problems, but still beneficial for ongoing protection.
Forensic analysis: Investigating email content, URLs, and any open trackers can provide clues about the original recipient or source of a replay attack, even if full headers are unavailable.
Email expert from Email Geeks advises that implementing DMARC on your domain and ensuring your SPF record includes an explicit fail (`-all`) for unauthorized senders can limit email spoofing.
1 Jan 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Email expert from Word to the Wise warns that a DMARC policy of `p=none` will not stop spoofing effectively, emphasizing the need for `quarantine` or `reject` policies for enforcement.
15 Jan 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
Official documentation and academic resources provide comprehensive insights into email authentication, security protocols, and recommended practices for preventing email abuse. They highlight the technical foundations that enable spoofing and the standardized solutions designed to mitigate it, emphasizing the cooperative nature of email security across the internet.
Key findings
Email spoofing mechanics: Documentation explains that email spoofing is possible because the 'From' address (RFC 5322.From) is easily forgeable, separate from the actual sending server (RFC 5321.MailFrom).
Authentication standards: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are specified standards designed to verify sender identity and prevent unauthorized use of a domain for email.
DMARC policy impact: A DMARC policy tells receiving mail servers whether to none, quarantine, or reject emails that fail SPF or DKIM alignment.
Importance of reporting: DMARC reporting (through RU/RUA tags) allows domain owners to receive aggregate and forensic reports on email authentication failures, providing data on spoofing attempts.
Key considerations
Gradual DMARC rollout: Documentation often recommends starting with p=none to monitor and identify legitimate email flows before moving to stricter policies like quarantine or reject. See our list of DMARC tags.
Header analysis tools: Resources often provide guidance on how to interpret email headers to trace the true origin of a message, helping differentiate between spoofing and actual compromise.
Sender reputation: Maintaining a good sender reputation is critical, and documentation highlights that SPF, DKIM, and DMARC contribute significantly by signaling legitimacy to receiving mail servers.
Technical article
Documentation from Purdue University outlines that email spoofing involves falsifying the sender's address to deceive the recipient, explaining how this is technically possible and its various uses and risks.
1 Apr 2021 - Purdue University
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun advises starting with a reputable email service provider (ESP) to prevent emails from going to spam, noting that some shared IP addresses can have poor sender reputations due to the actions of other users.