Summary
When your Mailgun shared IP shows a low reputation in Google Postmaster Tools (GPT), it can be alarming, but it doesn't always signal a crisis. The key is to assess the broader context, especially your domain reputation and the nature of your email sends. Shared IPs are common for transactional and notification emails, and their reputation can fluctuate due to the sending practices of other users on that same IP. Often, if your domain reputation remains high, the impact of a single low-reputation shared IP on your deliverability to Gmail recipients may be minimal. However, it's crucial to understand the underlying causes and take proactive steps to maintain your overall sender health.
Key findings
- Shared IP fluctuations: It is not uncommon for one or two shared IPs in Google Postmaster Tools to display a low reputation while others are stable.
- Domain reputation priority: Google tends to weigh domain reputation more heavily than IP reputation. If your domain reputation is high, a low shared IP reputation might not significantly impact your Gmail deliverability.
- Low engagement signals: For product notifications or transactional emails, low engagement (poor open rates or high ignore rates) can contribute to a low IP reputation, even if the content is legitimate.
- GPT data nuances: Google Postmaster Tools provides valuable insights, but its data, especially for IP reputation, isn't always a precise indicator of immediate deliverability issues. It should be used as one of several monitoring tools.
Key considerations
- Confirm IP type: Verify with your email service provider (ESP), such as Mailgun, whether the IP in question is indeed a shared IP or if it's dedicated to your sends. This distinction is crucial for determining your scope of action.
- Monitor domain reputation: Regularly check your domain reputation in Google Postmaster Tools. A consistently high domain reputation often overrides a temporary dip in a shared IP's standing.
- Assess email engagement: Analyze the engagement metrics (open rates, click-through rates, unsubscribe rates, spam complaints) for the emails sent via the problematic IP. Low engagement can lead to reputation issues, even for non-marketing emails. Consider if too many notifications are being sent or if their value to recipients is low.
- Implement best practices: Adhere to email best practices for all your sends. This includes maintaining clean lists, sending relevant content, and ensuring proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face challenges with shared IP reputation, as they have limited control over the sending behavior of others on the same IP. Their primary focus shifts to managing factors within their direct control, such as domain reputation and list engagement. They emphasize the importance of understanding the true impact of IP reputation versus domain reputation, especially when dealing with major mailbox providers like Gmail that prioritize domain-level signals.
Key opinions
- Limited shared IP control: Marketers acknowledge that there's very little they can do to directly influence the reputation of a shared IP, as it's affected by all users on that IP.
- Prioritize domain health: The consensus is to focus on maintaining a high domain reputation, as Google prioritizes this metric for deliverability.
- Engagement is critical: For transactional or notification emails, low engagement from recipients is a frequent cause of flagging, indicating that even non-promotional mail needs user interaction to build positive signals.
- Don't overreact: A single low IP reputation in GPT, especially if it's a shared IP and your domain reputation is strong, shouldn't cause immediate alarm.
Key considerations
- Audit notification sends: Regularly review your product notification and transactional email streams. Ensure they are relevant, timely, and truly needed by recipients to encourage engagement and avoid being ignored or marked as spam.
- Improve sender reputation: Beyond the IP, focus on comprehensive strategies to improve your overall sender reputation. This includes list hygiene, opt-in processes, and consistent sending patterns.
- Monitor engagement metrics: If possible, gain access to open rates and other engagement metrics for emails sent through the flagged IP. These insights are crucial for diagnosing the root cause of low reputation.
- Long-term reputation building: Understand that reputation building is a continuous process. Maintaining a positive sender identity involves consistent good sending habits over time.
- Address low gmail domain reputation: If your Gmail domain reputation is also low, this indicates a more significant issue requiring immediate attention to your sending practices.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks notes that a Mailgun shared IP is showing low reputation in Google Postmaster Tools, raising concerns about preventing further degradation. This situation specifically affects product notifications and transactional emails, prompting an investigation into potential causes within that email stream.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests that if emails are purely transactional and not marketing, low engagement might be the cause of poor reputation. They recommend rethinking what notifications are sent, as well as their frequency and relevance, to encourage more opens and interactions.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts often provide a nuanced perspective on IP reputation, particularly concerning shared IPs. They emphasize that while IP reputation is a factor, Google's algorithms heavily prioritize domain reputation. They advise against overreacting to isolated low IP scores on shared infrastructure, urging senders to focus on their own sending practices and the overall health of their domain.
Key opinions
- Shared IP limitations: Experts agree that when using a shared IP, there's limited direct action an individual sender can take to fix its reputation, as it's influenced by all users.
- Domain reputation dominance: Google primarily relies on domain reputation for filtering decisions. A good domain reputation often mitigates a poorer IP reputation on shared pools.
- GPT data caution: Google Postmaster Tools data, while helpful, can sometimes be misleading or reflect historical issues from previous IP users. It should not be the sole basis for panic.
- Dedicated IP risk: If it were a dedicated IP, a persistently poor reputation could eventually carry over and negatively impact the domain reputation.
Key considerations
- Assess actual impact: Before taking drastic measures, check if you are actually experiencing deliverability issues to Gmail. If emails are landing in the inbox and engagement is stable, the low IP reputation might not be causing significant harm.
- Verify IP status: Confirm with your ESP whether the IP in question is shared or dedicated. This fundamental piece of information guides further troubleshooting.
- Investigate root causes: If issues persist, or if it's a dedicated IP, thoroughly investigate the content and sending patterns for potential triggers like high complaint rates, spam trap hits, or low engagement that could cause a sudden drop in IP reputation.
- Understand GPT limitations: Recognize that GPT provides a generalized view and sometimes anomalies can appear. Don't assume every red indicator means a severe problem if your deliverability is otherwise unaffected.
- Distinguish between domain and IP: Understand the difference between IP and domain reputation and how they influence each other, especially for Google.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks advises that if it's a shared Mailgun IP, there is very little a single sender can do. They note it's not uncommon for one or two IPs in GPT to show a bad reputation while others on the same pool are fine, suggesting it may not be a critical issue.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from SpamResource.com explains that Google places significant weight on domain reputation over IP reputation. If your domain's sending history is clean and engagement is good, a dip in shared IP reputation is less likely to cause major deliverability problems to Gmail.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from Google and email service providers emphasizes the critical role of sender reputation in deliverability. For shared IPs, the collective sending behavior of all users on that IP contributes to its reputation. While individual bad actors can degrade a shared IP's score, sophisticated filtering systems increasingly rely on domain reputation as a primary indicator of sender trustworthiness. This means that maintaining a strong domain reputation through consistent best practices is paramount, even when using shared infrastructure.
Key findings
- Reputation components: Google Postmaster Tools provides separate reputation scores for IP and domain. Both are important, but their relative weighting can vary.
- Shared IP dynamics: A shared IP's reputation is a composite of all senders using it. A low score might not be solely due to your sending practices but rather those of other users on the same IP.
- Domain reputation influence: Google's documentation implies that a strong domain reputation can often offset a weaker IP reputation, particularly if the IP is shared.
- Engagement feedback: User engagement (or lack thereof) directly impacts sender reputation. High spam complaints or low interaction rates signal negative user feedback to mailbox providers.
Key considerations
- Understand GPT metrics: Familiarize yourself with all the dashboards in Google Postmaster Tools, not just IP reputation. Spam rate, feedback loop data, and authentication statuses provide a more complete picture.
- Focus on content quality: Ensure your emails are highly relevant and expected by recipients. This is the most effective way to foster positive engagement and improve overall sender reputation.
- Authentication standards: Properly implement and maintain SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. These authentication protocols help mailbox providers verify the legitimacy of your emails, contributing positively to your domain's reputation and overcoming potential IP issues.
- ESPs' role in shared IPs: ESPs like Mailgun manage the reputation of their shared IPs. They have systems in place to mitigate the impact of individual bad actors, but consistent poor performance across many users can still affect the pool. Trust that your ESP is doing its part to manage the shared IP health. You can often learn more about Mailgun's approach to sender reputation on their blog. Mailgun's insights on Postmaster Tools are valuable.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools states that IP reputation is one of the key metrics indicating the likelihood of emails from an IP being filtered to spam or rejected. A 'low' or 'bad' IP reputation means a high volume of email from that IP has been classified as spam.
Technical article
A Mailgun support article explains that on shared IPs, your sending practices contribute to the overall IP reputation alongside those of other customers. While they actively monitor and manage shared IP pools, individual customer actions (like high bounce rates or complaints) can still have an effect.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
How to resolve a low gmail domain reputation?
How to recover email domain and IP reputation after a spam incident or large accidental send?
How does google postmaster tools IP reputation affect deliverability when open rates are stable?
What does a bad IP reputation and good domain reputation mean on Google Postmaster?
How to improve email IP and domain reputation and what to audit for deliverability?
How can I recover my gmail IP reputation after a sudden drop and hitting spam traps?
Is a sudden bad IP reputation in google postmaster tools a false positive?
Ultimate guide to google postmaster tools v2
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
