Summary
Understanding optimal email sending speeds and the appropriate volume for a dedicated IP address is crucial for maintaining strong email deliverability. There isn't a single, universally recommended sending speed, as it largely depends on your sender reputation and the policies of recipient mailbox providers. Similarly, the decision to use a dedicated IP versus a shared IP is heavily influenced by your email sending volume and consistency. A dedicated IP provides exclusive control over your sending reputation, but it demands consistent, high-volume sending to build and maintain a positive history. Without sufficient volume, a dedicated IP can actually be detrimental to your deliverability.
Key findings
- Reputation driven: Email sending speed is primarily determined by your sender reputation and the specific policies of Internet Service Providers (ISPs), rather than technical throughput limits.
- Volume thresholds: Experts suggest dedicated IPs are generally suitable for senders dispatching at least 50,000 emails per month, with some recommending volumes closer to 750,000 emails per day for optimal benefit in today's landscape.
- Consistency is key: Maintaining a consistent sending volume and speed is vital for building and preserving a good sender reputation on a dedicated IP. Inconsistent sending or low volume can quickly harm your IP's standing.
- Shared IP suitability: For lower or inconsistent sending volumes, a shared IP address is often more appropriate as the reputation is collectively managed by the Email Service Provider (ESP).
Key considerations
- Sender reputation: Your overall sender reputation, influenced by factors like spam complaint rates and engagement, dictates how quickly mailbox providers will accept your mail. A poor reputation leads to throttling.
- IP warming: When moving to a dedicated IP, a careful IP warming process is essential. This involves gradually increasing your sending volume to build trust with ISPs.
- Volume consistency: Fluctuations in sending volume on a dedicated IP can negatively impact your sender reputation, making consistent volume management critical.
- Cost vs. benefit: Dedicated IPs typically come with a higher cost. Evaluate whether your sending volume and specific needs justify this investment for reputation control and deliverability improvements.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often seek clear guidelines on optimal sending speeds and the thresholds for dedicated IP usage, reflecting a common desire for quantifiable benchmarks. Many understand that higher volumes generally necessitate a dedicated IP, but debate exists on the precise minimum volume needed to maintain a healthy sender reputation. There's also an acknowledgement that while high volumes can benefit from dedicated IPs, some Email Service Providers (ESPs) may not even offer shared IP options, making the decision less flexible for some senders.
Key opinions
- Volume threshold debate: Marketers frequently discuss the minimum email volume required for a dedicated IP, with suggestions ranging from 10,000 emails per day to much higher figures.
- Impact of low volume: There is a consensus that sending too little volume on a dedicated IP can harm its reputation, as it doesn't provide enough consistent data for ISPs to build trust.
- ESP constraints: Some marketers point out that certain ESPs may only offer dedicated IPs, removing the option for shared IPs even for lower-volume senders.
- Engagement metrics: High open and reply rates are seen as indicators of successful email scaling and good sender reputation, suggesting that engagement is as crucial as volume.
Key considerations
- Sender profile: Assess your specific sending needs. If your volume is low or inconsistent, a shared IP might offer better deliverability stability.
- Gradual increases: When increasing volume, do so gradually to allow ISPs to build trust in your sending patterns and avoid flags for suspicious activity.
- Engagement monitoring: Beyond just send volume, actively monitor your open and click-through rates, as these metrics are crucial for maintaining a healthy sender reputation, particularly on a dedicated IP.
- Platform limitations: Be aware that some ESPs may only offer dedicated IPs, which could influence your decision if you are a smaller sender. Understanding how dedicated IPs benefit marketers is essential.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks inquires about optimal sending speed for bulk email campaigns and marketing systems. They are interested in understanding what constitutes a good speed in terms of emails per second or minute for effective email marketing.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Quora highlights that insufficient sending volume on a dedicated IP can negatively impact deliverability, as it prevents the consistent activity needed to build reputation. Low volume means ISPs have less data to trust the sender.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts consistently highlight that email sending speed is less about raw technical capacity and more about policy and sender reputation. They caution against pushing to theoretical maximums, emphasizing that mailbox providers dynamically adjust acceptance rates based on your mail stream's trustworthiness. For dedicated IPs, the consensus is that they are primarily for high-volume, consistent senders who can actively manage their reputation. If volume is insufficient or inconsistent, a dedicated IP can quickly become a liability, leading to throttling or blocklisting.
Key opinions
- Policy over technical limits: Sending speed is dictated more by ISP policies, which are influenced by your reputation, than by the technical capacity of your email system.
- Reputation variability: Sending limits vary significantly across different providers and depend on the real-time reputation of your mail stream with each.
- High volume for dedicated IPs: Dedicated IPs are best suited for high-volume senders, typically sending millions of emails daily, allowing them to control their own reputation destiny.
- Consistency for reputation: Maintaining a steady sending speed and volume is crucial for building and preserving a positive IP reputation.
Key considerations
- Avoid technical limits: It is generally not advisable to send at the absolute technical limits of your system, as this can quickly lead to deliverability issues and being added to a blocklist.
- Sender behavior: Poor sending practices can severely restrict your volume to even a few hundred emails per hour, regardless of IP type.
- Minimum volume for dedicated IP: If you are unsure whether you need a dedicated IP, you likely don't. Shared IPs are often better for volumes below a certain threshold, such as 750,000 emails per day.
- ISP sophistication: Consumer mailbox providers are increasingly adept at filtering mail based on content and sender reputation, making IP reputation less singularly important than it once was, but still a factor.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks explains that email sending limits are highly variable, depending on the specific recipient providers and the current reputation of the sender's mail stream. This dynamic nature means limits are not static.
Expert view
Email expert from Mailgun suggests that dedicated IPs are most suitable for high-volume senders who maintain consistent email streams, emphasizing that sporadic sending can harm reputation. This consistency helps build trust with ISPs.
What the documentation says
Technical documentation from leading email service providers and industry resources consistently emphasizes that dedicated IPs are best suited for senders with high and consistent email volumes. The documentation outlines the benefits of having full control over one's sender reputation but also highlights the critical need for proper IP warming and sustained activity. Low or sporadic volume on a dedicated IP is generally discouraged, as it hinders the reputation-building process and can lead to poor deliverability.
Key findings
- Control over reputation: Dedicated IPs provide exclusive control, meaning your sending practices directly and solely influence your IP's reputation.
- High volume requirement: Documentation typically recommends dedicated IPs for consistent, high-volume senders, often specifying monthly or daily email thresholds (e.g., 50,000 per month or 150-200k per day).
- IP warming importance: A gradual increase in sending volume (IP warming) is crucial for new dedicated IPs to build trust with ISPs.
- Risk of low volume: Without sufficient and consistent volume, a dedicated IP can struggle to establish a positive reputation, potentially leading to deliverability issues.
Key considerations
- Volume consistency: Documentation emphasizes that maintaining consistent daily or weekly volume on a dedicated IP is paramount for its long-term reputation and deliverability. Volume peaks and dips should be avoided.
- Shared IP alternative: For senders with lower or infrequent volumes, shared IPs are often presented as a more suitable and forgiving option, where reputation is managed collectively by the ESP.
- IP management responsibility: With a dedicated IP, the responsibility for maintaining a good sender reputation falls squarely on the sender. This includes careful list management and content quality.
- Scalability considerations: Documentation helps inform decisions on when to consider multiple dedicated IPs for very large email lists or high daily volumes to ensure timely delivery and consistent performance.
Technical article
Mailgun documentation highlights that dedicated IPs are most effective for consistently high-volume email sending, warning that infrequent usage can negatively impact sender reputation. This underscores the need for a stable sending pattern to benefit from a dedicated IP.
Technical article
Twilio SendGrid documentation advises that a dedicated IP is only recommended for senders exceeding 50,000 emails per month, detailing how higher-tier plans allow for multiple IP addresses. This provides a clear volume threshold for their service.
Related resources
5 resources
Related pages
What are acceptable email sending speeds and why do ESPs throttle or pause email delivery?
What is the minimum send volume needed for a dedicated IP address?
What are recommended initial email sending volumes for email deliverability?
Best practices for email frequency and volume management after IP warming
What is the recommended maximum email volume per IP address for deliverability?
How to maintain dedicated IP reputation with ISPs for email sending?
How many IPs are needed per million emails sent daily?
What are the deliverability risks of volume peaks and dips on a dedicated IP?
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
How email blacklists actually work: a simple guide
