Summary
Sending a large maintenance email campaign to a list with historically low sending volume presents significant deliverability challenges, risking damage to your sender reputation and potential blocks by Internet Service Providers. The core strategy to mitigate these risks involves a careful, phased approach centered on rigorous list hygiene, gradual volume ramp-up, and strong technical foundations. This ensures your messages reach inboxes without triggering spam filters or high complaint rates, which are common when a large, unengaged list receives a sudden influx of emails.
Key findings
- Gradual Volume Increase: To avoid alarming Internet Service Providers, large sends to low-volume lists must be introduced gradually. Begin with the most engaged segments and slowly expand sending volume over days or weeks, rather than sending a sudden, large burst.
- Rigorous List Hygiene: Prior to sending, it is critical to thoroughly clean your list by removing inactive subscribers, hard bounces, and past complainers. Consider re-permissioning campaigns for very old or unengaged segments to ensure explicit consent and reduce spam complaints.
- Sender Reputation Protection: Abruptly sending to a large, unengaged list can severely damage your sender and domain reputation. Consistent, monitored sending and adherence to best practices like proper authentication, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and rDNS, are vital for building trust with mail servers.
- Strategic Content and Consent: Content for maintenance campaigns should provide clear value, focusing on updates or useful information rather than sales. Verifying explicit consent for older subscribers is paramount to prevent high complaint rates and deliverability issues.
- Continuous Monitoring: Closely track key metrics such as bounce rates, spam complaint rates, and open rates during and after the campaign. Utilize ISP Feedback Loops to identify and promptly remove complainers, allowing for immediate adjustments to safeguard deliverability.
Key considerations
- Impact of Inactive Subscribers: Sending to a large pool of inactive subscribers is highly risky, potentially leading to spam trap hits, low engagement, and severe negative impacts on sender reputation. Prioritize purging truly dormant users over attempting broad re-engagement.
- IP Warm-up Requirements: Whether using a dedicated IP, which requires its own careful warm-up, or relying on an ESP's shared IP, understanding and adhering to a gradual volume increase strategy is crucial, especially for an IP with a 'cold' or low sending history.
- Long-term Deliverability Strategy: A successful large maintenance send sets the stage for future campaigns. Implement ongoing list segmentation, engagement monitoring, and regular list cleaning to maintain a healthy sender reputation and consistent deliverability over time.
What email marketers say
13 marketer opinions
Successfully executing a large maintenance email campaign to a list with low prior sending volume demands a meticulously planned, gradual approach to protect sender reputation and ensure deliverability. This involves strategically warming up your sending by beginning with the most engaged segments and incrementally increasing message volume over an extended period. Paramount to this effort is extensive list hygiene, including the removal of unengaged contacts, suppression of past non-deliveries, and, for older lists, potentially running re-permissioning campaigns to re-confirm consent. Alongside a phased rollout, maintaining relevant content and closely monitoring performance metrics are crucial steps to navigate the risks associated with sudden high-volume sends.
Key opinions
- Gradual Volume Ramp-Up: Implement a phased sending approach, starting with the most engaged subscribers and slowly increasing volume over days or weeks to avoid sudden spikes that can trigger spam filters and damage sender reputation. Batching sends in smaller, regular chunks is a key tactic.
- Thorough List Hygiene: Prior to sending, rigorously clean your list by removing inactive subscribers, hard bounces, and past complainers. Consider a re-permissioning campaign for very old or dormant segments to verify explicit consent and ensure recipients genuinely want to receive your emails.
- Strategic List Segmentation: Segment your email list based on engagement levels. For maintenance campaigns, prioritize sending to your most active subscribers first, then gradually expanding to broader segments, rather than a blanket send to the entire list.
- Content Relevance and Value: Ensure campaign content is highly relevant and provides clear value, focusing on updates, useful information, or exclusive content. Avoid overly sales-driven messages to encourage engagement and minimize spam complaints from surprised recipients.
- Continuous Performance Monitoring: Closely track key metrics during and after the campaign, including bounce rates, spam complaint rates, and open rates. Be prepared to pause sends or adjust your strategy immediately if you observe significant spikes in bounces or complaints.
Key considerations
- Daily Sending Volume Limits: Avoid exceeding a certain percentage, such as 50% or double, of your typical daily email volume to prevent alarming receivers and to absorb any potential increases in complaints or bounces.
- IP and Domain Reputation Management: Understand the implications of using a dedicated versus shared IP for warm-up. Crucially, recognize that even with low prior volume, maintaining a strong domain reputation through consistent good sending practices, low complaint rates, and engagement is vital for deliverability.
- Explicit Consent Verification: When reactivating older or less engaged segments, it is paramount to verify explicit consent. Sending to recipients whose consent is unclear or who have not engaged in a long time significantly increases the risk of high spam complaints and deliverability issues.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests scrubbing the list by unsubscribing those not successfully delivered to in the past 2 years to reduce list size, and then randomly batching out the maintenance email in chunks every few hours.
27 Jul 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks advises against 'spikey' sending behavior to avoid tripping alarms at receivers, recommending not to exceed double, or preferably 50%, of the normal daily email volume to absorb potential complaint spikes or additional bounces.
12 Jan 2025 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
For organizations planning a significant maintenance email campaign to a list that has seen minimal prior sending activity, expert consensus emphasizes that a sudden, large volume send is highly detrimental to email deliverability. Such an approach risks hitting spam traps, generating high bounce rates, and provoking low engagement, all of which can severely damage your sender reputation. Instead, the recommended strategy involves a cautious, phased rollout, prioritizing the removal of inactive subscribers and a gradual warming of your sending infrastructure to ensure messages reach their intended inboxes without triggering spam filters.
Key opinions
- Inactive Subscriber Risk: Sending a large campaign to inactive subscribers significantly increases the risk of hitting spam traps, incurring high bounce rates, and receiving low engagement, which directly harms sender reputation and email placement.
- Gradual Volume Ramp-Up: For lists with low prior sending volume, a slow and deliberate warm-up process is essential. Begin by sending small batches to highly engaged recipients and gradually increase volume to build and maintain a positive sender reputation with Internet Service Providers.
- Targeted Re-engagement: Broad, large-scale re-engagement attempts to an entire dormant list are generally ineffective and risky. Instead, segment your list and focus limited-volume re-engagement efforts on only the most recently active or promising inactive users to mitigate deliverability risks.
- List Hygiene Imperative: Prioritize purging inactive subscribers rather than including them in large campaigns. These users are unlikely to engage and pose a significant threat to your future email deliverability, making their removal a critical best practice.
Key considerations
- Sender Reputation Vulnerability: A sudden surge in email volume after a period of dormancy or low activity can severely degrade your sender reputation, leading to poor inbox placement or outright blocking by ISPs. Prioritize rebuilding trust with a gradual approach.
- Strategic Re-engagement Scope: While re-engagement campaigns can reactivate some users, recognize that most inactive subscribers will not re-engage. Tailor your re-engagement efforts to a small, targeted segment rather than risking your entire list's deliverability.
- Importance of Warm-up Protocol: Regardless of whether you use a new IP or an existing one with a 'cold' sending history, adhering to a gradual volume warm-up protocol is fundamental to establishing and maintaining trust with email service providers.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that sending to inactive subscribers is highly risky for deliverability. It can lead to hitting spam traps, high bounce rates, and low engagement, all of which negatively impact sender reputation and email placement. She strongly advises purging these subscribers from the list rather than sending a large campaign to them, as they are unlikely to engage and pose a significant threat to future email deliverability.
29 Jan 2023 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares insights on re-engagement campaigns, noting that while they can yield some re-activations, the majority of inactive subscribers are unlikely to re-engage. She advises against broad, large-scale re-engagement attempts to an entire dormant list. Instead, she recommends segmenting the list and targeting only the most recently active or promising inactive users with a focused, limited-volume approach to mitigate the risk of damaging sender reputation.
20 Feb 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Executing a large maintenance email campaign to a list with low historical sending volume requires a multi-faceted approach that prioritizes building and maintaining sender trust. Essential practices include not only a strategic, gradual increase in sending volume, but also a thorough list hygiene process, and the foundational implementation of crucial email authentication protocols. These measures collectively ensure emails are delivered effectively, minimizing the risk of being flagged as spam or blocked by recipient mail servers.
Key findings
- Gradual Volume Ramp-up: Emphasized by Google, gradually increasing sending volume from lower amounts after a period of low activity helps mail servers learn sending patterns and build trust, significantly reducing spam flagging.
- Email Authentication Essentials: Proper setup of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is fundamental for deliverability, especially when sending large campaigns from a domain with limited prior volume, as it verifies sender legitimacy to ISPs.
- Thorough List Cleaning: As advised by SendGrid, sending only to active contacts and rigorously cleaning lists by removing unengaged or inactive subscribers is crucial to reduce bounce rates and spam complaints, which are vital for a healthy sender reputation.
- ISP Feedback Loop Utilization: Monitoring ISP Feedback Loops allows senders to promptly identify and remove recipients who mark emails as spam, a critical step for protecting sender reputation and preventing future blocks during large campaigns.
- Reverse DNS Configuration: Ensuring correct Reverse DNS (rDNS) or PTR records for your sending IP address is a best practice that helps recipient mail servers verify the legitimacy of your sending IP and domain, fostering trust especially after low sending periods.
Key considerations
- Sender Reputation Impact: A good sender reputation is paramount; for new or low-activity senders, a gradual volume increase helps establish trust with mail servers, while neglecting this can lead to mail being marked as spam.
- Preventing Spam Complaints and Bounces: Maintaining a clean list by sending only to engaged contacts and removing inactive subscribers directly reduces spam complaints and bounce rates, which are critical metrics for overall deliverability.
- Verification of Sender Legitimacy: Implementing email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, along with correct rDNS records, is essential to prove sender legitimacy to ISPs, particularly when sending large volumes from a domain with low prior activity.
- Proactive Complaint Management: Utilizing ISP Feedback Loops enables real-time awareness of spam complaints, allowing for immediate removal of complainers from your list, which is vital for sustained sender reputation and avoiding blocks.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools Help emphasizes the importance of a good sender reputation. For new senders or those sending large volumes after a period of low activity, it recommends starting with lower volumes and slowly increasing them. This helps mail servers learn your sending patterns and build trust, reducing the likelihood of mail being marked as spam.
1 Sep 2024 - Google Postmaster Tools Help
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid Docs advises only sending emails to active contacts. When sending a large campaign to a list with low engagement, it's a best practice to clean your list by removing unengaged or inactive subscribers to reduce bounce rates and spam complaints, which are critical for maintaining a good sender reputation.
29 Jan 2025 - SendGrid Docs
How do I improve email deliverability for a client with a dormant list and low sending volume?
How to maintain email reputation with low volume quarterly newsletter sends?
What are best practices for deliverability when sending a first email campaign to an old list?
What are the best practices for sending a COVID-19 email to a large, unengaged list while preserving deliverability?
What are the best practices for sending a one-time email to a large list of inactive users?
What are the best practices for sending privacy updates to a large, disengaged email list?
