Summary
After the technical process of IP warming is complete, managing email frequency and volume shifts from building initial trust to sustaining sender reputation through consistent, high-quality engagement. There are no definitive, publicly disclosed maximum sending limits from Internet Service Providers; instead, an IP's capacity is determined by its established reputation and the ongoing engagement of its recipient base. While IP reputation is a factor, domain reputation and content signature are increasingly critical, particularly for B2C communications. For maintaining a dedicated IP's standing, consistent significant sending volume is generally required, making shared IPs a better option for smaller senders. Ultimately, successful post-warming strategy hinges on maintaining a stable sending rhythm, prioritizing content quality, and meticulously managing subscriber engagement and list hygiene to align with audience expectations.
Key findings
- Reputation Governs Volume: The maximum email volume an IP can send is directly tied to its reputation, with well-regarded IPs capable of sending millions per hour, while those with poor reputations are limited to thousands. ISPs typically keep specific volume limits private.
- Domain Reputation's Rise: While IP reputation remains important, domain reputation and content signature are increasingly significant, especially for B2C email sends, influencing deliverability outcomes more profoundly.
- Dedicated IP Volume Needs: To maintain a dedicated IP's reputation, a minimum consistent sending volume, such as 50,000 to 100,000 emails per month, is generally advised. Very small senders often find shared IPs more suitable due to this volume requirement.
- No Fixed Post-Warming Limit: There is no universally accepted specific paper or hard limit detailing post-warming best practices for email volume. Success hinges on a combination of consistent sending, high engagement, and diligent list management.
- Engagement Over Raw Volume: After IP warming, deliverability shifts from technical hurdles to subscriber experience. The ability to send high volumes is primarily driven by audience engagement, as sending to unengaged users will still result in poor performance metrics, regardless of IP status.
Key considerations
- Maintain Consistency: After warming, it is crucial to maintain a consistent sending volume and rhythm, avoiding sudden, erratic spikes. ISPs expect stable patterns from reputable senders.
- Prioritize Engagement: Subscriber engagement, measured by opens, clicks, and low complaint rates, becomes the primary factor dictating email volume and frequency post-warming. High engagement allows for higher volumes, while low engagement necessitates reducing frequency.
- Adjust Based on Behavior: Email frequency should be dynamic, adapting to recipient behavior. If engagement declines, reduce frequency; if it remains high, gradual increases in volume can be considered, always focusing on quality over mere quantity.
- Practice List Hygiene: Ongoing list cleaning and meticulous opt-in management are essential. Sending to unengaged, inactive, or invalid addresses can harm sender reputation, even with a warm IP.
- Monitor Key Metrics: Continuously monitor deliverability metrics such as bounce rates, complaint rates, and open rates. These indicators provide crucial insights into list health and the appropriateness of your sending frequency and volume.
- Align with Expectations: The optimal email frequency is one that aligns with subscriber expectations and provides consistent value, preventing subscriber fatigue, unsubscribes, and spam complaints.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
Once an IP is warmed, the focus for email frequency and volume management pivots sharply from technical build-up to an audience-centric strategy. This involves understanding that while an IP's capacity is substantial when well-regarded, its true limit is dictated by recipient engagement and sender reputation. Maintaining a strong domain reputation and consistently providing value are paramount, even more so than the warmed IP itself, especially in B2C contexts. The ideal approach involves a consistent, predictable sending schedule that adapts fluidly to subscriber behavior, prioritizing quality interactions over sheer quantity to sustain deliverability and prevent subscriber fatigue.
Key opinions
- High Volume Requires Multiple IPs: Sending exceptionally high volumes, such as 12 million emails in 1.5 hours, necessitates the use of multiple dedicated IPs, for example, 4 IPs, to handle the load and maintain performance.
- Domain Reputation's Ascendance: For B2C communications, domain reputation and content signature are increasingly vital factors for deliverability, often outweighing the importance of IP reputation after warming.
- Minimum Volume for Dedicated IPs: Maintaining a healthy dedicated IP reputation generally requires a consistent minimum sending volume, with 50,000 to 100,000 emails per month, distributed evenly, being an ideal baseline.
- Engagement as the Primary Driver: After IP warming, an audience's engagement is the single largest determinant of permissible sending volume and deliverability, enabling high volumes for engaged lists but leading to poor outcomes for unengaged ones.
- ISP Volume Limits are Private: Internet Service Providers (ISPs) maintain private internal limits on maximum email volumes, meaning senders must infer capacity based on reputation and engagement metrics rather than fixed disclosed numbers.
Key considerations
- Subscriber Behavior Dictates Volume: Email frequency and volume must be dynamically adjusted based on subscriber engagement; reduce frequency if engagement drops, and only gradually increase volume if engagement remains high.
- Focus on Quality Over Quantity: The primary emphasis post-warming should be on sending high-quality, relevant content to engaged segments rather than broad, high-volume blasts, which naturally lowers complaint rates and boosts engagement.
- Maintain Consistent Sending Patterns: A consistent and predictable sending schedule is crucial to maintain sender reputation, as erratic sending patterns can flag ISPs; however, this consistency should also allow for flexibility based on subscriber expectations.
- Prioritize List Hygiene: Ongoing list hygiene, including the removal of inactive or unengaged subscribers, is essential to prevent harm to sender reputation, even with a fully warmed IP.
- Test and Adapt Frequency: Proactively test different email frequencies with audience segments to identify optimal engagement levels, aiming to stay top-of-mind without causing subscriber fatigue or opt-outs.
- Align with Subscriber Expectations: The optimal email frequency provides consistent value and aligns with subscriber expectations, preventing issues like unsubscribes, spam complaints, and subscriber fatigue.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares insights on email volume limits for IPs, stating that a sender trying to send 12 million emails in 1.5 hours required 4 IPs. She notes that while there's a theoretical maximum, ISPs keep these numbers private. For maintaining IP reputation, a minimum of 50k per month is suggested, with 100k per month spread evenly being more ideal. She also notes that for B2C sends, domain reputation and content signature are becoming more important than IP reputation.
24 Jan 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares a SendGrid document on IP warm-up schedules and notes that its volume progression section is particularly interesting for managing email frequency and volume after warming.
22 Apr 2023 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
After IP warming, managing email frequency and volume transitions from technical build-up to an audience-centric approach. While an IP's capacity is substantial when well-regarded, its true limit is ultimately dictated by recipient engagement and overall sender reputation. There are no fixed, publicly disclosed limits; instead, an IP's ability to send high volumes is a direct reflection of its established trust. Sustaining a strong domain reputation and consistently providing valuable content are paramount. The ideal strategy involves a consistent, predictable sending schedule that dynamically adapts to subscriber behavior, prioritizing quality interactions over sheer quantity to ensure deliverability and prevent subscriber fatigue.
Key opinions
- IP Reputation Determines Max Volume: A well-regarded IP can handle millions of emails per hour, whereas one with a poor reputation is limited to thousands, underscoring the ongoing importance of reputation post-warming.
- No Universal Post-Warming Volume Paper: There isn't a specific, publicly available document detailing best practices for email volume after IP warming, highlighting the nuanced, experience-driven nature of this stage.
- Dedicated IP Volume Thresholds: While common wisdom suggests a single dedicated IP can send 1-2 million emails daily, higher volumes typically necessitate multiple IPs. Maintaining a dedicated IP's reputation often requires a minimum of 100,000 emails sent at least three times a week, a benchmark that may have increased.
- Subscriber Engagement is Paramount: The optimal email frequency and volume are primarily determined by subscriber preferences and engagement levels, such as opens and clicks, rather than arbitrary post-warming limits.
- Consistency is Key for Reputation: Maintaining a consistent sending volume and pattern is crucial for post-warming deliverability, as Internet Service Providers expect stable behavior from reputable senders.
Key considerations
- Tailor Volume to Engagement: Align email frequency and volume directly with subscriber engagement. High engagement supports higher frequency, while declining engagement indicates a need to reduce send rates.
- Manage Dedicated IP Volume: For dedicated IPs, plan for consistent, high sending volumes to maintain reputation. Smaller senders might find shared IPs more suitable to avoid underutilization.
- Prioritize Subscriber Expectations: Always prioritize what your subscribers want to receive. Regular, even daily, emails are acceptable if the content is engaging and aligns with subscriber expectations.
- Avoid Erratic Sending: After warming, maintain a stable and predictable sending volume. Sudden, unexplained fluctuations, whether drops or spikes, can signal issues to ISPs and degrade your sender reputation.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that the maximum email volume an IP can send depends heavily on its reputation, with good reputations allowing millions per hour and poor ones only thousands. He notes there isn't a specific paper detailing post-warming best practices for volume.
18 Jul 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that common wisdom suggests a single IP can send 1-2 million emails per day, recommending more IPs for higher volumes. She advises that very small senders are better suited for shared IPs, as dedicated IPs are a limited resource. To maintain reputation on a dedicated IP, she recommends sending a minimum of 100,000 emails at least 3 days a week, though she notes this is an older recommendation and current requirements might be higher.
31 Jul 2021 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
6 technical articles
Once the initial IP warming phase is complete, maintaining strong email deliverability hinges on a strategic blend of consistent sending practices, vigilant monitoring, and proactive list management. Leading providers universally emphasize the necessity of preserving a stable sending pattern, avoiding abrupt volume changes, and continuously adapting frequency based on recipient engagement. Sustained success post-warming is deeply tied to meticulous list hygiene, ensuring mail is sent only to genuinely opted-in and active subscribers, thereby keeping complaint and bounce rates low and reinforcing a positive sender reputation with ISPs.
Key findings
- Consistent Sending Pattern: Maintaining a steady and predictable email sending volume and rhythm is universally emphasized by providers like SendGrid, Google, and Mimecast as crucial for sustained sender reputation post-warming.
- Engagement-Driven Adaptability: Email frequency and volume should be dynamically adjusted based on continuous monitoring of recipient engagement metrics, with SendGrid and Campaign Monitor recommending adaptation to audience behavior.
- Continuous Metric Monitoring: Post-warming, ongoing oversight of key deliverability metrics, including bounce rates, complaint rates, and open rates, is essential for identifying issues and ensuring healthy list management, as advised by Amazon SES and Google.
- Proactive List Management: Consistent list cleaning, managing opt-ins diligently, and removing unengaged or invalid addresses are critical practices highlighted by Campaign Monitor and Microsoft to prevent deliverability issues and maintain low complaint rates.
- Avoid Erratic Volume Spikes: Providers like SendGrid, Google, and Mimecast strongly warn against sudden, large, or unexplained increases in sending volume, as such erratic patterns can negatively impact sender reputation and trigger filtering, regardless of initial warming success.
Key considerations
- Sustain Consistent Sending: Continue to send emails with a consistent volume and predictable rhythm, actively avoiding large, erratic spikes that can raise red flags with Internet Service Providers.
- Monitor Key Deliverability Metrics: Regularly track bounce rates, complaint rates, and open rates. These metrics are vital indicators of your list's health and the appropriateness of your sending frequency.
- Adjust Frequency by Engagement: Dynamically tailor your email frequency based on how your recipients engage. If engagement declines, consider reducing frequency; if it remains high, gradual increases may be possible.
- Emphasize List Hygiene: Make list cleaning and rigorous opt-in management an ongoing priority. Removing unengaged or invalid addresses is crucial for preventing deliverability issues and maintaining a positive sender reputation.
- Send Only to Opted-In Users: Ensure all emails are sent exclusively to users who have explicitly opted in, as this practice is fundamental to keeping complaint rates low and demonstrating legitimate sending behavior to ISPs.
- Proactively Prevent Anomalies: Implement systems for continuous monitoring of outbound email traffic to detect and address any anomalies or sudden increases in rejection rates, which can signal issues to email security providers.
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid explains that after IP warming, senders should maintain a consistent sending volume and rhythm, avoiding large, erratic spikes. They also advise continuously monitoring engagement metrics to ensure good deliverability and adapting frequency based on recipient behavior.
22 Oct 2024 - SendGrid Documentation
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools emphasizes that maintaining a consistent and legitimate sending pattern is crucial for good sender reputation. Even after IP warming, sudden, large increases in volume or sending to unengaged users can negatively impact deliverability, recommending senders monitor their reputation metrics closely.
30 Jun 2024 - Google Postmaster Tools Help
How should you handle IP warming when sending volume is low and recipients may not engage with emails, especially for transactional content?
What are best practices for IP warming strategy and email volume scaling?
What are the best practices and schedules for warming up an IP address for email sending?
What are the best practices for ISP-based vs volume-based IP warming strategies?
What is the best IP warmup strategy for small send volumes when switching ESPs and using shared IPs?
What is the best IP warmup strategy for weekly email sends on new IPs?
