Poor sending practices are a primary culprit behind email deliverability issues, ranging from messages landing in the spam folder to complete rejection by mailbox providers. These practices often signal to ISPs and blocklist operators that a sender may be malicious or irresponsible, leading to a damaged sender reputation. Avoiding these pitfalls requires a strategic approach to list management, content creation, and technical configurations.
Key findings
Authentication issues: Lack of proper email authentication, such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, is a significant red flag for mailbox providers. Without these, your emails are more likely to be seen as spoofed or fraudulent, leading to deliverability problems.
Poor list hygiene: Sending to invalid, inactive, or spam trap email addresses severely harms your sender reputation. Regularly cleaning your list is crucial.
Spammy content: Subject lines or email bodies containing excessive capitalization, exclamation marks, suspicious phrases, or image-only content can trigger spam filters.
Volume spikes: Sending large volumes of emails from a new or cold IP/domain without a proper warm-up strategy can be perceived as spamming behavior, leading to immediate blocklisting or throttling.
High complaint rates: When recipients mark your emails as spam, it directly impacts your sender reputation. This often stems from poor segmentation, irrelevant content, or unclear unsubscribe options.
Key considerations
Domain and IP reputation: Your sending reputation is built over time based on your sending habits. A damaged reputation can lead to emails being sent to spam or rejected. Consistent good practices are key to maintaining a healthy domain reputation.
Engagement metrics: Low open rates and click-through rates, coupled with high bounce and complaint rates, signal disinterest and can hurt your deliverability. Focus on engaging content and a relevant audience.
Blocklist status: Being listed on an email blacklist (or blocklist) will severely impact your deliverability. You should proactively monitor your blocklist status to identify and address issues quickly. More details on how poor sending practices trigger informational listings can be found directly from Spamhaus.
Content quality: Beyond spam triggers, ensure your content provides value and aligns with subscriber expectations. Irrelevant or poorly designed emails lead to low engagement and higher unsubscribe rates.
Sending frequency: Sending too frequently can lead to subscriber fatigue and increased complaints, while sending too infrequently can result in low engagement and stale lists.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face a complex landscape where seemingly minor sending errors can significantly impact campaign performance. Their discussions frequently revolve around practical challenges in list management, content optimization, and understanding the nuances of how mailbox providers interpret sending behaviors. The emphasis is typically on balancing engagement with compliance and avoiding common pitfalls that lead to deliverability woes. Many marketers highlight the importance of proactive list cleaning and managing subscriber expectations to prevent issues before they escalate, reinforcing the idea that email list quality is foundational to good deliverability.
Key opinions
List acquisition quality: Improperly gathering subscribers, such as purchasing lists or using single opt-in without verification, is a common reason for poor deliverability.
Image-only emails: Sending emails that are entirely image-based or image-heavy is a significant red flag for spam filters because it's a technique often used by spammers for image mapping.
From address mismatch: Using a 'from email' address that does not align with your primary sending domain can lead to poor deliverability and authentication issues.
Spam trap hits: Hitting spam traps, often due to outdated or purchased lists, immediately damages sender reputation and can lead to being added to a blacklist.
Key considerations
Subscriber re-engagement: Even with long-term subscribers, it can be beneficial to periodically ask for re-confirmation, such as a click-on-a-link-to-ensure-you-still-get-mail approach, to maintain an engaged list.
Domain authentication: Sending without an authenticated domain is a major factor that hurts deliverability. Custom authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is seen as a foundational step to avoid being perceived as a spammer.
IP warm-up: For new or inactive accounts, starting with a limited number of emails and gradually increasing volume (warming up the IP) is vital to avoid triggering spam filters.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks observes that B2B spammers who generate complaints to an ESP often get blocklisted.
16 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Campaign Monitor highlights that sending without custom authentication is a significant factor in email deliverability, as it can make a sender appear spammy.
15 Sep 2015 - Campaign Monitor
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability consistently emphasize that poor sending practices are not just minor inconveniences but fundamental threats to an email program's success. Their insights often delve into the technical underpinnings of why certain practices lead to negative outcomes, stressing the importance of adherence to industry standards and the continuous monitoring of key metrics. Experts frequently advise on the proactive management of sender reputation and the critical role of authentication protocols like DMARC in ensuring email reaches its intended destination. Understanding advanced email authentication is a common theme.
Key opinions
Reputation is paramount: A low IP or domain reputation is the most common reason emails are filtered to spam. This underscores the need for consistent good sending behavior.
Authentication is non-negotiable: Properly configured SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are crucial for establishing sender trust with ISPs. Without them, even legitimate emails face deliverability challenges.
Bounce management: Ignoring bounces, especially hard bounces, leads to sending to invalid addresses, which negatively impacts sender reputation and can lead to blocklisting.
Spam trap avoidance: The best way to avoid spam traps is through stringent email address verification upon collection and ongoing list hygiene.
Key considerations
Gradual volume increases: Experts advise against sudden bulk sending from new or dormant IPs, recommending a structured warm-up process to build a positive sending history.
Engagement monitoring: Consistently low engagement rates, coupled with high complaint rates, are strong indicators of poor sending practices or an unengaged audience. This can be mitigated by focusing on improving email click-through rates.
Content relevance: Beyond technical aspects, the relevance and quality of email content play a significant role. Irrelevant content increases the likelihood of complaints and low engagement.
Feedback loops: Utilizing feedback loops from ISPs helps identify and remove users who mark emails as spam, preventing further deliverability issues for those recipients.
Ongoing monitoring: Regularly checking email blacklists and monitoring domain reputation through tools like Google Postmaster Tools is essential for early detection and remediation of deliverability problems.
Expert view
Email deliverability expert from Spamresource.com emphasizes that maintaining a clean email list by regularly removing inactive or invalid addresses is crucial for sustained inbox placement and positive sender reputation.
01 Jan 2024 - Spamresource.com
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Wordtothewise.com suggests that effective bounce management, including both hard and soft bounces, is fundamental to preventing an IP or domain from being blocklisted.
15 Feb 2024 - Wordtothewise.com
What the documentation says
Official documentation from various sources, including email service providers and anti-spam organizations, provides definitive guidelines on best practices to ensure email deliverability. This documentation often outlines the technical requirements, content standards, and behavioral expectations that senders must meet to avoid triggering spam filters and blocklists. It serves as a foundational resource for understanding the rules of the road for email sending. Adherence to these guidelines is critical for any sender looking to achieve high inbox placement rates and is also integral to avoiding spam filters.
Key findings
Authentication is standard: Documentation consistently stresses the importance of proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) as a basic requirement for trusted sending.
Consent and list quality: Clear opt-in processes and ongoing list hygiene, including promptly handling bounces and unsubscribes, are fundamental to maintain good sender reputation.
Content best practices: Documentation often provides guidelines on subject line creation, text-to-image ratios, and avoiding spammy keywords to prevent content-based filtering.
Volume management: New senders or those with fluctuating volumes are advised to follow IP warm-up procedures to gradually build trust with mailbox providers.
Key considerations
Reputation tracking: Understanding and actively monitoring your sender reputation, often through postmaster tools, is highlighted as crucial for identifying and addressing issues.
User engagement metrics: High complaint rates, low engagement, and high bounce rates are clear signals of poor sending practices that need immediate attention. Regular email deliverability tests can help identify these.
Feedback loop implementation: Setting up and responding to ISP feedback loops allows senders to automatically remove users who complain, preserving sender reputation.
Monitoring blocklists: Documentation often recommends regular checks against major blacklists and understanding the reasons for listings, as detailed by sources like Spamhaus Technology.
Technical article
Documentation from Spamhaus Technology indicates that common poor sending practices, such as incorrect bounce handling, often lead to informational listings and negatively impact sender reputation.
15 Aug 2022 - Spamhaus Technology
Technical article
Official guide from Campaign Monitor outlines that failing to use custom authentication for sending emails is a major factor that can cause an email to be perceived as spam.