Summary
Warming up a new IP address for B2B email sends requires careful planning, especially to avoid issues with security vendors like Proofpoint. The core challenge lies in building a positive sender reputation by gradually increasing sending volume while maintaining high engagement and low complaint rates. Unlike consumer domains, B2B filters often have different criteria, though consistent good sending practices remain paramount. Understanding how services like Proofpoint assess incoming mail and adapting your warm-up strategy accordingly is crucial for successful inbox placement.
Key findings
- Gradual ramp-up: Start with low volumes and slowly increase your sending traffic, allowing mailbox providers to assess your sending patterns and reputation.
- Engaged audience first: Begin by sending to your most active and engaged subscribers to generate positive interactions (opens, clicks), which signals good sender reputation. This is vital to building a positive IP reputation.
- Consistency matters: While daily sending might accelerate warming, establishing a pattern that mirrors your eventual regular send frequency is generally more effective in the long run. ISPs (Internet Service Providers) learn your typical sending behavior.
- B2B specifics: B2B email filters, such as Proofpoint, may behave differently from consumer domains like Gmail or Outlook, often focusing on advanced threat protection and user feedback more than just raw volume surges. Understanding how to contact Proofpoint about IP blocks is important.
- Monitor bounces: If you experience block bounces, particularly from specific filtering services, investigate the reasons provided in the bounce messages. This feedback is critical for adjusting your strategy.
Key considerations
- Audience segmentation: Even during a rapid warm-up, sending to highly engaged segments can mitigate negative impacts from volume fluctuations.
- Reputation building: The goal is to build a positive sender reputation that signals trustworthiness to mailbox providers, not just to send a certain volume. AtData's IP warming best practices emphasize this foundational principle.
- Handling deadlines: If facing a tight deadline, a more aggressive daily warm-up can be considered, but it carries higher risk and may require very careful list segmentation and monitoring.
- Diagnostic tools: Utilize bounce logs and reputation tools to identify specific blocks (e.g., Proofpoint) and understand the underlying causes, which often relate to recipient feedback rather than just sending volume.
What email marketers say
Email marketers generally agree that IP warming should align with typical sending patterns to establish a consistent sender reputation. However, when faced with tight deadlines, some marketers consider more aggressive daily sending schedules, provided they meticulously manage list quality and engagement. The primary concern is to avoid disruptions that could trigger spam filters and lead to blocklists, especially with sophisticated B2B security solutions like Proofpoint.
Key opinions
- Mimic normal frequency: It is generally advisable to warm up an IP by mimicking the normal send frequency you intend to use. This helps mailbox providers learn your expected sending behavior.
- Disruptive changes: Changing send frequency drastically during or after warming, for example, from daily to weekly, can be disruptive from a user's perspective and potentially impact deliverability.
- Aggressive warm-up for deadlines: If there's a strict deadline, sending every day during the warm-up period is a possible strategy, but it requires careful management and awareness of potential risks.
- B2B challenges: B2B sending environments present unique challenges, and IP warming may not be the sole factor influencing blocks from filters like Proofpoint.
Key considerations
- User experience: Consider the recipient's perspective. Sudden changes in frequency, even during warm-up, could lead to unexpected user behavior, such as complaints or unsubscribes.
- ISP sensitivity: ISPs (Internet Service Providers) and security vendors analyze send frequency as part of your sender reputation. Significant fluctuations without clear positive engagement can be viewed negatively, potentially leading to deliverability issues. This is part of a broader set of email deliverability issues.
- Understanding bounces: When encountering block bounces, especially persistent ones, it's crucial to identify the source and reason. Simply restarting the warm-up without addressing the root cause may lead to recurring blocks. For example, Proofpoint blocks often stem from recipient feedback rather than just volume.
- Long-term pattern: The goal of warming is to establish a sustainable sending pattern. While speeding up might seem appealing, it could undermine the long-term health of your IP's reputation. Twilio SendGrid offers a comprehensive email guide to IP warm up.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks asked for advice on IP warming, specifically whether to mimic normal send frequency or send more frequently to fewer people during the warm-up period. They aim to send to 450,000 subscribers every other week eventually, but wondered if sending daily during warm-up would be problematic if they later drop in frequency.
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks suggested starting slow with the most engaged audience to train mailbox providers. The goal is to show that recipients want the emails while gradually increasing volume to build trust.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability emphasize that IP warming is about training mailbox providers' machine learning algorithms to recognize your sending patterns and trust your emails. This means consistency is key, as these algorithms don't respond well to sudden or erratic changes. While B2B filters might have different considerations than consumer domains, significant blockages, especially from systems like Proofpoint, often indicate underlying issues beyond mere warm-up speed, frequently relating to recipient feedback or content.
Key opinions
- Pattern establishment: During IP warm-up (or conditioning), you are establishing the sending pattern for your IP. Deviating from this pattern, even if not immediately harmful, doesn't actively contribute to building a stable reputation.
- Machine learning behavior: Mailbox provider machine learning algorithms are averse to new or inconsistent sending behavior. They require time to adjust and build trust in your IP.
- Consistency is paramount: The more closely your warm-up mirrors your intended ongoing sending practices, the better for establishing a reliable sender profile.
- B2B vs. consumer domains: Many B2B email filters are less concerned with IP warming in the traditional sense compared to consumer-facing domains. Their blocking criteria often lean more heavily on recipient feedback, spam traps, or content analysis. This is why it's important to understand ISP specific warming strategies.
Key considerations
- Root cause analysis: When facing significant block bounces, it is crucial to understand why and where delivery is failing. Bounce messages, like those from Proofpoint, often provide clues about the problem, such as if your IP gets blocklisted.
- Proofpoint specific behavior: Proofpoint is known to collect substantial feedback from recipients. This implies that blocks are often related to user complaints or engagement metrics rather than simply the speed of IP warm-up. Reviewing recipient feedback loops is important.
- Contacting postmasters: For persistent blocks, especially from specific providers, directly contacting their postmaster team (e.g., postmaster@proofpoint.com) for details on the block reason is an essential step.
- Addressing underlying issues: If you're being repeatedly blocked (or blacklisted) after delisting, it suggests a continuous negative signal. This could be due to list quality, content, or engagement rates. A thorough review of these factors is more impactful than simply adjusting the warm-up pace.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks states that when you are warming or conditioning an IP, you are establishing a sending pattern for that IP. Any deviation from this normal pattern, even if it doesn't cause immediate harm, also doesn't actively help build your IP's reputation.
Expert view
An expert from Spamresource.com advises that email machine learning algorithms are generally not favorable towards new or inconsistent sending behaviors. It takes time for these systems to adapt and develop trust in a sender's reputation, emphasizing consistency over rapid changes.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and guides from major email service providers (ESPs) and security vendors consistently highlight the importance of IP warming as a fundamental step in establishing sender reputation. They advocate for a structured, gradual increase in sending volume, often emphasizing the quality of recipients and consistent engagement over sheer speed. While general principles apply, some documentation also acknowledges that specific B2B security solutions have unique filtering mechanisms that might require a deeper understanding beyond standard warm-up protocols.
Key findings
- Sender reputation foundation: IP warming is universally recognized as critical for building a positive sender reputation with ISPs and mailbox providers.
- Gradual volume increase: Most documentation advises a slow, controlled increase in sending volume over several weeks to allow the new IP to gain trust.
- Engagement driven: The success of IP warming heavily relies on sending to highly engaged subscribers first, minimizing bounces, spam complaints, and other negative signals. This helps avoid getting put on a blocklist.
- Consistency in sending: Maintaining a consistent sending schedule during warm-up helps mailbox providers accurately profile your sending patterns and prevents sudden, suspicious spikes or drops in volume.
Key considerations
- Daily volume limits: Many guides provide suggested daily volume limits for IP warm-up, often increasing progressively. These are general guidelines that may need adjustment based on specific recipient domains.
- Monitoring and adaptation: Continuous monitoring of deliverability metrics (bounces, complaints, open rates) is advised. Be prepared to slow down or adjust your strategy if negative signals appear.
- Proofpoint interaction: While general warm-up rules apply, B2B security vendors like Proofpoint may integrate advanced threat intelligence and user feedback loops. Specific documentation (e.g., Proofpoint integration guides) might offer insights into their particular filtering logic and how to mitigate blocks. The Salesforce Trailhead on Email Deliverability Concepts covers warm-up strategies.
- Domain authentication: Ensure proper authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are fully configured before and during IP warm-up, as this is a foundational aspect of sender trustworthiness.
Technical article
Official Microsoft documentation emphasizes that new sending IPs need to be warmed up gradually to establish a positive reputation. Sending too many emails suddenly from a new IP can lead to immediate blocking or filtering into spam folders by their systems.
Technical article
The SMTP RFC 5321 specifies that email systems should employ various mechanisms to detect and mitigate unwanted mail. While not explicitly defining IP warming, it underscores the need for senders to behave predictably and responsibly to avoid being flagged as malicious.
Related resources
14 resources
Related pages
What are the best strategies for warming email sending IPs by individual ISP?
What are the best practices for dedicated IP warm-up?
How to contact Proofpoint about IP blocks and understand dynamic block behavior?
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
How email blacklists actually work: a simple guide
What happens when your ip gets blocklisted?
How do you warm up a new email sender address?
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
