Summary
Permanent bounce errors, such as those indicating a full or inactive mailbox, are critical signals email marketers must address to maintain a healthy sender reputation and effective deliverability. Unlike temporary soft bounces, these errors often signify that an email address is no longer valid or actively monitored by the recipient. Properly identifying and managing these bounces prevents wasted sending efforts and protects your domain from being flagged by internet service providers (ISPs).
Key findings
- Distinguishing errors: Different ESPs (like Hotmail, Gmail, iCloud) may use the same SMTP code, such as 552 5.2.2, but provide varying textual descriptions (e.g., "Mailbox full" vs. "out of storage space and inactive"), which can imply different underlying causes or permanence levels.
- Temporary vs. permanent: SMTP 5.x.x bounce codes generally indicate permanent failures, while 4.x.x codes often signify temporary issues like a full mailbox that might resolve. For more details, see our guide on hard and soft bounces.
- Gmail's inactive flag: Gmail's 5.x.x bounce with the inactive qualifier is particularly concerning, as it strongly suggests the account is abandoned, even if the storage issue is temporary. This aligns with Google's broader efforts to manage inactive accounts.
- Reputation impact: Continuously sending emails to addresses that generate permanent bounces (or even repeated soft bounces that don't resolve) can severely damage your sender reputation, increasing the likelihood of future emails landing in spam folders or being blocklisted. For information on how over-quota mailboxes affect sender reputation, see our guide.
Key considerations
- Immediate suppression for permanent bounces: For hard bounces (5.x.x errors), especially those indicating inactivity, the email address should be promptly removed from your active mailing list to protect your sender reputation. Failing to do so can lead to your emails being marked as spam. Mailchimp's guide on soft vs. hard bounces emphasizes this.
- Quarantine for borderline cases: For addresses that show persistent temporary bounce codes (e.g., repeated over-quota) but not definitive permanent failure, consider a quarantine period (e.g., 30 days) before deciding on permanent removal. This allows for potential mailbox resolution without immediate deletion.
- Re-engagement strategy: Only attempt re-engagement with bounced addresses if there's clear evidence of user activity elsewhere (e.g., website login, app usage, purchase history, or clicks on previous emails). Without such signals, continued sending is unlikely to be productive and carries deliverability risks.
- Website notification: For users whose emails are bouncing, consider implementing a website banner or in-app notification to inform them of delivery issues and prompt them to update their contact information. This can recover otherwise lost contacts.
- Monitoring and adaptation: Stay vigilant to changes in bounce behavior from major ISPs like Gmail and Yahoo. Their new sender requirements, while gradual, can significantly impact how inactive or full mailboxes are handled and should inform your list hygiene practices.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often grapple with the nuances of bounce errors, especially when distinguishing between temporary (soft) and permanent (hard) failures. The consensus among marketers leans towards aggressive removal of addresses generating permanent bounces, while acknowledging that temporary issues might warrant a short retry period. Managing these errors effectively is seen as crucial for maintaining list quality and avoiding negative impacts on sending reputation.
Key opinions
- Permanent failure handling: Marketers frequently agree that email addresses resulting in permanent bounce errors, such as "mailbox full and inactive," should be removed from mailing lists. This is a common practice to avoid repeated failures and potential blocklistings.
- Quarantine approach: A strategy involving a quarantine period for permanent bounces (e.g., 30 days) is considered. If emails continue to bounce after this period, the address is then deleted. This is mentioned in our guide on managing hard bounces.
- Client-specific re-engagement: The decision to attempt re-engagement with users who have bounced emails often depends on the specific client or business model. For example, if the email is tied to an online account, attempting re-engagement might be considered after a few weeks.
- Reputation risk: While some marketers believe the reputation hit from a few persistent bounces might be minimal, the general caution is that repeated sending to dead addresses (or those perpetually over quota) can negatively impact deliverability, especially at scale. For more on this, see Twilio's insights on bounce management.
Key considerations
- Defining abandonment: Marketers need to define what constitutes an "abandoned" account for their specific use case. This typically involves a combination of bounce type (permanent vs. temporary) and lack of engagement over a defined period. Our article on which bounces to eliminate provides further insight.
- Website integration: A potentially complex but valuable strategy is to display a website banner or in-app message to users whose emails are bouncing, informing them of the delivery issue. This proactively prompts them to update their email address.
- Engagement as a re-send trigger: For emails experiencing permanent bounces, marketers should only consider re-sending if there is recent, explicit engagement from the user on other platforms, such as logging into a web account, opening an app, or making a purchase.
- Monitoring new ISP policies: The ongoing changes from major mailbox providers (like Gmail and Yahoo's new sender requirements) mean that bounce management strategies must be dynamic. Marketers should anticipate gradual impacts even if immediate changes aren't observed.
Marketer view
An Email Geeks marketer noted that they believe an account that hasn't cleaned up after a certain time of being over quota is abandoned, leading them to permanently fail messages. They suggested removing such addresses from general mailings and potentially trying re-engagement after a few weeks, depending on the client's needs.
Marketer view
A marketer from EngageBay recommends removing hard bounce email addresses from your mailing list immediately. They emphasize that continuing to send emails to these addresses is not advisable, as it can negatively impact your sender reputation and deliverability.
What the experts say
Experts emphasize the critical distinction between temporary and permanent bounce errors, particularly the nuanced responses from major ESPs like Gmail. They advise that treating all 5.x.x errors as permanent is crucial, especially when an address shows signs of inactivity. The consensus is that continued attempts to send to such addresses actively harm sender reputation and should be avoided unless there's explicit, recent engagement from the recipient.
Key opinions
- Gmail's 5.x.x. bounce: An expert pointed out that Gmail uses two versions of mailbox full bounces: 4.x.x for temporary full mailboxes and 5.x.x for mailboxes that are full and disabled. The 5.x.x version is indeed more permanent.
- Data aggregation: Gmail's storage data is aggregated across all Google products (photos, drive, etc.), meaning an account can become full due to non-email activity and later resolve. However, the inactive flag in Gmail's bounce message indicates a permanent issue.
- Reputation consequences: Sending to permanently failing addresses unnecessarily adds a "negative tick" to your sender reputation. Experts advise against this as it can lead to deliverability problems down the line. To learn more about this, check out our guide on understanding your email domain reputation.
- ISP sensitivity: The risk associated with retrying dead addresses varies significantly among different ISPs. Some are much more sensitive to this practice than others, making a universal "retry X times" policy risky without careful consideration.
Key considerations
- Monitor ISP changes: Experts caution that changes from major players like Yahoo and Google are often gradual. Even if immediate significant error rate increases aren't observed, marketers should anticipate future impacts and adjust their strategies accordingly. For more information, see our blog on email deliverability issues in 2025.
- Signal-based sending: For accounts experiencing permanent failures, cease sending emails unless there's a strong, recent signal of life from the user, such as logging into a website, opening an application, making a purchase, or clicking an older email link. This approach aligns with best practices for maintaining a healthy sender reputation, as discussed by SpamResource.
- Proactive user notification: Experts routinely recommend displaying information on websites when a user's email address is bouncing. This allows users to self-correct their contact information, preventing further delivery failures.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks explains that Gmail differentiates between two types of mailbox full bounces: one being a temporary 4.x.x error, and the other a more permanent 5.x.x bounce indicating a mailbox that is full and also disabled. They emphasize the permanence of the latter.
Expert view
An expert from SpamResource suggests that senders should only continue sending mail to addresses that produce permanent failures if there is a clear sign of life from the user. These signs include logging into a website account, opening an app, making a purchase, or clicking a link in a previously sent email.
What the documentation says
Email service provider (ESP) documentation and RFCs often define permanent bounce errors by their SMTP codes, typically 5.x.x, indicating unrecoverable delivery failures. These documents generally advise immediate removal of such addresses from active sending lists to preserve sender reputation. They highlight that maintaining clean lists is a fundamental component of effective email deliverability.
Key findings
- RFC definitions: SMTP response codes within the 5xx range are defined as permanent negative completion replies. This means the command was not accepted and the mail transaction failed. The sender should not reattempt to send the same mail without modifications. For more on this, see what RFC 5322 says.
- Common permanent bounce codes: Common permanent bounce codes include 550 (mailbox not found, rejected for policy reasons), and 552 (exceeded storage allocation), among others. When a 550 error includes an inactivity message, it's a strong indicator of a dead address. For specific guidance on handling 550 errors, see our detailed article.
- List hygiene importance: Official documentation from various ESPs and email marketing platforms consistently emphasizes that regularly cleaning your email list of hard bounces is paramount for maintaining a good sender reputation and ensuring high deliverability rates.
Key considerations
- Automated suppression: Email service providers typically have automated systems to detect and suppress hard bounces. Marketers should leverage these features to ensure that permanently undeliverable addresses are not repeatedly targeted. SocketLabs discusses this in their article on email bounces.
- Proactive verification: To minimize permanent bounces, documentation often recommends proactive measures such as implementing double opt-in processes and using email verification services to validate addresses at the point of collection or periodically. This is a key aspect of best practices for email verification.
- Reputation preservation: Documentation consistently links high hard bounce rates to diminished sender reputation. ISPs interpret attempts to send to non-existent or inactive addresses as signs of poor list quality or potentially abusive sending practices, leading to stricter filtering.
Technical article
MessageFlow's documentation states that when a hard bounce occurs, it is crucial to remove the invalid email address from your mailing list immediately. They emphasize that continuing to send emails to such addresses can severely harm your sender reputation and negatively impact overall email deliverability.
Technical article
Twilio's blog, on email bounce management, clarifies that a hard bounce signifies a permanent email rejection. This is typically because the recipient's email address is either invalid or does not exist at all, requiring immediate removal from the sender's active list.
Related resources
6 resources
Related pages
What is the difference between hard and soft email bounces and how should they be managed?
How do over-quota mailboxes and soft bounces affect email deliverability and sender reputation, and what are the best practices for managing them?
How to manage hard bounced email addresses for future sends?
What are the best practices for email verification and reducing bounces?
What types of email bounces should be eliminated and which should be monitored?
How should email marketers handle Gmail addresses with overquota inboxes?
What action should I take for an email with a 550 error code and inactivity bounce message?
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
