Summary
Effectively managing hard bounced email addresses is critical for maintaining good sender reputation and ensuring high deliverability. The consensus among email marketing experts and documentation from leading Email Service Providers (ESPs) is that hard bounces, which signify a permanent delivery failure, necessitate immediate and permanent removal from all mailing lists. Neglecting to do so can severely damage sender reputation and result in being flagged as a spammer by Internet Service Providers. Most ESPs automatically handle this suppression, but for self-hosted solutions, manual and rigorous removal is essential. While marketing emails should be suppressed indefinitely until a user re-subscribes, transactional emails present a unique scenario where delivery attempts might continue, or alternative communication channels should be explored, due to their legitimate and often critical nature. There is also a discussion regarding whether old, non-existent addresses truly become recycled spam traps, though hitting them often points to poor list acquisition.
Key findings
- Mandatory Suppression: Hard bounces indicate a permanent delivery failure and require immediate and permanent removal from all active sending lists.
- Sender Reputation Impact: Failing to promptly suppress hard-bounced email addresses significantly harms a sender's reputation, increases the likelihood of being flagged as a spammer by Internet Service Providers (ISPs), and negatively impacts overall email deliverability.
- ESP Automation: Most Email Service Providers (ESPs) such as Mailchimp, SendGrid, HubSpot, ActiveCampaign, and AWeber automatically suppress hard-bounced contacts, preventing future sends to protect the user's sender reputation and ensure compliance with best practices.
- Transactional vs. Marketing: A crucial distinction exists between transactional and marketing emails; marketing emails are typically suppressed indefinitely after a hard bounce, while transactional emails, due to their legitimate and often critical nature, may warrant continued delivery attempts or alternative communication, despite generally having more lenient compliance requirements.
- Spam Trap Risk: Non-existent or old, unused email addresses can eventually be repurposed as spam traps. Frequently hitting these indicates issues with list acquisition practices rather than widespread blocking due to hitting spam traps.
Key considerations
- Defining Hard Bounces: The precise definition of a hard bounce and the specific rejection scenario can influence the management strategy. While many advocate for immediate suppression, some suggest waiting for multiple rejections over a period, such as three bounces over 14 days, before permanently removing a non-transactional address.
- Retry Strategies: For non-transactional emails, retrying a hard bounced address is generally not recommended. However, for transactional messages, some advise using email validation tools to cross-check bounced addresses and only retrying those confirmed undeliverable by multiple tools. This is a judgment call depending on the importance of the transactional message.
- Alternative Communication: When transactional emails bounce, it is advisable to attempt to inform the user through an alternative communication channel if available, given the importance and potential legal implications of non-delivery for such messages.
- User Re-engagement: For marketing lists, once an email address hard bounces, it should be suppressed indefinitely. Re-engagement with such contacts typically requires the user to actively re-subscribe or request to receive messages again.
- Self-Hosted Solutions: While most Email Service Providers automatically manage hard bounces, senders using self-hosted solutions must implement robust manual or automated processes for immediate and permanent removal of these addresses to protect their sender reputation.
- Recycled Spam Traps: There is a discussion among experts regarding the extent to which 'mailbox does not exist' hard bounces turn into recycled spam traps. While some confirm this is a real phenomenon that can indicate poor list acquisition, others argue that mailbox providers do not need to accept an email to register an invalid delivery attempt and penalize sender reputation.
What email marketers say
14 marketer opinions
Managing hard bounced email addresses is fundamental to maintaining a healthy sender reputation and achieving strong email deliverability. For most email types, particularly marketing communications, the consensus among experts is to immediately and permanently remove addresses that result in a hard bounce, as this signifies a permanent delivery failure and continued attempts gravely undermine sender reputation. While many Email Service Providers (ESPs) automatically handle this suppression, those managing self-hosted systems must implement stringent, immediate removal processes. A distinct approach is often warranted for transactional emails, which may necessitate continued delivery attempts or outreach via alternative channels due to their critical nature and potential legal implications. There's also an ongoing expert discussion regarding the precise nature and risk of recycled spam traps and how internet service providers manage invalid delivery attempts.
Key opinions
- Immediate Removal: Hard bounced email addresses indicate a permanent delivery failure and must be promptly and permanently removed from all active mailing lists to protect sender reputation and deliverability.
- ESP Automation & Self-Management: While most Email Service Providers (ESPs) automatically suppress hard bounces, users of self-hosted solutions must implement robust, immediate manual or automated removal processes to avoid damaging sender reputation.
- Marketing vs. Transactional: Marketing emails should be suppressed indefinitely post-bounce, requiring user re-subscription for future contact. Transactional emails, however, warrant a more nuanced approach, potentially including retries or alternative communication, given their critical nature and often more lenient compliance requirements.
- Spam Trap Indicators: Non-existent or inactive email addresses can eventually become spam traps, with frequent hits often pointing to issues in list acquisition, though experts hold differing views on the mechanism by which these affect sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Contextual Bounce Management: The precise definition of a hard bounce and the specific rejection scenario can influence strategy. While immediate suppression is often recommended, some suggest waiting for multiple rejections over a period, such as three bounces over 14 days, for non-transactional mail, noting that one-bounce suppression is also acceptable.
- Transactional Retry Strategies: For critical transactional messages, consider using email validation tools to cross-check bounced addresses and only retry those confirmed undeliverable by multiple tools.
- Alternative User Notification: If transactional emails hard bounce, attempt to notify the user through other available communication channels, especially given the importance and potential legal implications of non-delivery for such messages.
- Avoiding Excessive List Washing: Be cautious of overly aggressive list-washing services that might remove legitimate recipients or deviate from email practices that primarily benefit the recipient.
- Non-Standardized Errors: Acknowledge that bounce errors are not standardized across all email providers, which can complicate the precise definition and handling of hard bounces.
- Divergent Spam Trap Views: Experts have differing opinions on whether 'mailbox does not exist' hard bounces evolve into recycled spam traps and how mailbox providers register invalid delivery attempts to impact sender reputation, suggesting it's often more indicative of poor list acquisition.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that for marketing emails, they suppress hard bounces indefinitely until a user requests removal. They also clarify that users might know they aren't receiving messages and would then be informed of the reason. For transactional emails, Beth advises always attempting delivery, citing the legitimate action by the user and potential legal implications for non-delivery.
12 Oct 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares that they suppress hard bounces indefinitely, agreeing with the concern that you cannot be sure if it's the same person if an address becomes deliverable again.
5 Oct 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
Hard bounced email addresses indicate a permanent failure in delivery and should be immediately and permanently removed from all mailing lists to prevent damage to sender reputation.
Key opinions
- Permanent Undeliverability: Hard bounces signify that an email address is permanently undeliverable, often due to reasons such as a non-existent address or domain.
- Immediate Suppression: Upon receiving a hard bounce notification, the email address must be removed from your sending list without delay.
- Permanent Removal: Hard bounced addresses require permanent suppression, meaning they should not be included in any future sends.
- Reputation Preservation: Prompt and permanent removal of hard bounces is essential to avoid harming or damaging your sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Core Deliverability Practice: Managing hard bounces effectively is a fundamental practice for maintaining good email deliverability and sender trustworthiness.
- Avoiding ISP Flags: Neglecting to remove hard bounces can lead to your sender reputation being flagged negatively by Internet Service Providers.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that hard bounces indicate permanently undeliverable email addresses and should be removed from a sending list immediately and permanently to avoid harming sender reputation.
7 Jan 2022 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares that hard bounces are permanent delivery failures, such as non-existent addresses or domains, and these addresses must be removed from your email list immediately and permanently to prevent damage to your sender reputation.
18 Feb 2022 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Effectively managing hard bounced email addresses is crucial for maintaining sender reputation and deliverability. Many popular Email Service Providers (ESPs), including Mailchimp, SendGrid, HubSpot, and ActiveCampaign, automate this process by automatically suppressing these addresses from future mailings. This proactive approach helps protect the sender's reputation and ensures compliance with ISP best practices. However, some services, such as Amazon SES, place the responsibility on the sender to actively process bounce notifications and remove invalid addresses. Neglecting this manual task on platforms like SES can lead to severe consequences, including the suspension of sending privileges.
Key findings
- Automated Suppression by Major ESPs: Leading Email Service Providers such as Mailchimp, SendGrid, HubSpot, and ActiveCampaign automatically remove hard bounced email addresses from future sends.
- Reputation Protection: The automatic suppression implemented by these ESPs is a critical feature designed to protect the sender's reputation and ensure high deliverability.
- Sender Responsibility with Amazon SES: Amazon SES operates differently, notifying senders of hard bounces via SNS and requiring them to actively process these notifications and remove the bounced addresses from their mailing lists.
- Consequences of Non-Compliance: Failure to manually remove hard bounced addresses on platforms like Amazon SES can result in severe penalties, including the suspension of sending privileges.
Key considerations
- Platform-Specific Handling: Senders must understand the specific bounce management approach of their email platform, whether it involves automatic suppression or requires manual intervention.
- Compliance and Reputation: Diligent management of hard bounces, regardless of the platform's automation level, is paramount for maintaining a strong sender reputation and ensuring email deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp Knowledge Base explains that Mailchimp automatically removes hard bounced email addresses from future sends to protect the user's sender reputation and deliverability, so manual removal by the user is generally not required for contacts managed within the platform.
29 Nov 2023 - Mailchimp Knowledge Base
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid Docs shares that SendGrid maintains an internal suppression list for hard bounced email addresses, which automatically prevents any future email attempts to these addresses to safeguard the sender's reputation and ensure compliance with ISP best practices.
26 May 2023 - SendGrid Docs
How should email marketers handle permanent bounce errors like full or inactive mailboxes?
Should I send emails to a list with a high hard bounce rate and how to prevent them?
Should I suppress soft bounces from my email lists for better list hygiene?
What are best practices for managing bounced, unsubscribed, and spam-complaint users in email marketing?
What are the best practices for managing hard and soft bounces in daily email campaigns?
What is the best practice for cleaning up soft bounces in email marketing?
